Poultry litter and cow dung biochar as P sources for cowpea cultivation in two Ghanaian soils

IF 3.5 Q1 AGRONOMY Frontiers in Agronomy Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI:10.3389/fagro.2023.1233255
E. Nartey, N. Sulemana, Awudu Razak, T. Adjadeh, A. M. Akumah, C. Amoatey, M. Abekoe
{"title":"Poultry litter and cow dung biochar as P sources for cowpea cultivation in two Ghanaian soils","authors":"E. Nartey, N. Sulemana, Awudu Razak, T. Adjadeh, A. M. Akumah, C. Amoatey, M. Abekoe","doi":"10.3389/fagro.2023.1233255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main constraint to cowpea, Vigna unguiculata, production in West Africa is unavailability of applied phosphorus due to ligand exchange with clay minerals and precipitation reactions facilitated by low pH and low organic matter.To overcome this challenge, cow dung biochar (CB) and poultry litter biochar (PB) were applied as P sources for cowpea cultivation in Plinthustult and Kandiustalf soil in Ghana. The biochar types and triple super phosphate (TSP) were applied to meet the standard phosphorus requirement (SPR) and ½ SPR of the soils. Basal K from KCl was added to the TSP treatment. In addition to a non-amended soil, the treatments were triplicated and arranged in a completely randomized design in a screen house for an efficacy trial using cowpea as the test crop. Moisture content was maintained at 80% field capacity.Hundred cowpea seed weight was 20.3 g and 19.6 g for the TSP-amended Plinthustult at SPR and ½ SPR, respectively. This increased to 25.1 g and approximately 27 g at SPR and ½ SPR in the CB- and PB-amended Plinthustult, respectively. Hundred seed weight for TSP at both rates was similar in the two soils. The PB-amended Kandiustalf at SPR had seed with a weight of 27.02 g, 1.1 g heavier than the ½ SPR. The CB-amended Kandiustalf at both rates had 100 seeds weighing 25 g. Residual available P was 334.2 mg/kg and 213.2 mg/kg at SPR and ½ SPR, respectively, in the Plinthustult as opposed to a paltry 2.5 mg/kg at SPR in the TSP counterpart. The study recommends for the two biochar types to be applied at ½ SPR.","PeriodicalId":34038,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Agronomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2023.1233255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main constraint to cowpea, Vigna unguiculata, production in West Africa is unavailability of applied phosphorus due to ligand exchange with clay minerals and precipitation reactions facilitated by low pH and low organic matter.To overcome this challenge, cow dung biochar (CB) and poultry litter biochar (PB) were applied as P sources for cowpea cultivation in Plinthustult and Kandiustalf soil in Ghana. The biochar types and triple super phosphate (TSP) were applied to meet the standard phosphorus requirement (SPR) and ½ SPR of the soils. Basal K from KCl was added to the TSP treatment. In addition to a non-amended soil, the treatments were triplicated and arranged in a completely randomized design in a screen house for an efficacy trial using cowpea as the test crop. Moisture content was maintained at 80% field capacity.Hundred cowpea seed weight was 20.3 g and 19.6 g for the TSP-amended Plinthustult at SPR and ½ SPR, respectively. This increased to 25.1 g and approximately 27 g at SPR and ½ SPR in the CB- and PB-amended Plinthustult, respectively. Hundred seed weight for TSP at both rates was similar in the two soils. The PB-amended Kandiustalf at SPR had seed with a weight of 27.02 g, 1.1 g heavier than the ½ SPR. The CB-amended Kandiustalf at both rates had 100 seeds weighing 25 g. Residual available P was 334.2 mg/kg and 213.2 mg/kg at SPR and ½ SPR, respectively, in the Plinthustult as opposed to a paltry 2.5 mg/kg at SPR in the TSP counterpart. The study recommends for the two biochar types to be applied at ½ SPR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家禽粪便和牛粪生物炭作为两种加纳土壤中豇豆种植的磷源
西非豇豆(Vigna unguiculata)生产的主要制约因素是,由于与粘土矿物的配体交换以及低pH和低有机物促进的沉淀反应,无法获得施用的磷。为了克服这一挑战,在加纳的Plinthustult和Kandiustalf土壤中,牛粪生物炭(CB)和家禽粪便生物炭(PB)被用作豇豆种植的磷源。应用生物炭类型和三重超磷酸盐(TSP)来满足土壤的标准磷需求(SPR)和½SPR。将KCl中的碱性钾添加到TSP处理中。除了未改良的土壤外,这些处理是三重的,并在筛选室中以完全随机的设计进行安排,以进行以豇豆为试验作物的药效试验。水分含量保持在80%的田间容量。在SPR和½SPR条件下,TSP修正的Plinthustult的百粒豇豆种子重量分别为20.3g和19.6g。在CB和PB修正的Plinthustult中,SPR和½SPR时,这分别增加到25.1克和约27克。在两种土壤中,TSP在两种速率下的百粒重相似。在SPR条件下,PB改良的Kandiustalf的种子重量为27.02 g,比½SPR重1.1 g。在两种速率下,CB改良的Kandiustalf都有100颗种子,重量为25 g。在SPR和½SPR条件下的Plinthustult中,残留有效磷分别为334.2 mg/kg和213.2 mg/kg,而在TSP条件下,SPR条件下残留有效磷仅为微不足道的2.5 mg/kg。该研究建议在½SPR条件下使用两种生物炭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Agronomy
Frontiers in Agronomy Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
123
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Toxicological risk assessment of mechanical-chemical vs. chemical weed control techniques in sugar beet in Germany using SYNOPS-GIS Amplicon sequencing identified a putative pathogen, Macrophomina phaseolina, causing wilt in African eggplant (Solanum aethiopicum) grown in Tanzania and Uganda Effects of transplanting and AMF inoculation on the fruit yield of African eggplants (Solanum aethiopicum and Solanum anguivi) in Tanzania Using integrated weed management systems to manage herbicide-resistant weeds in the Canadian Prairies Mulching as a weed management tool in container plant production - review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1