The Bishops of the Diocese of Vilnius and Lithuanian Domestic Politics in 1709–17: Attitudes, Problems, and Solutions

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.12775/aph.2022.125.08
Mindaugas Šapoka
{"title":"The Bishops of the Diocese of Vilnius and Lithuanian Domestic Politics in 1709–17: Attitudes, Problems, and Solutions","authors":"Mindaugas Šapoka","doi":"10.12775/aph.2022.125.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article looks into the participation of the bishop ordinary of the diocese of Vilnius, Kazimierz Konstanty Brzostowski, and his suffragan, Maciej Józef Ancuta, in Lithuanian politics of the period between 1709 and 1717. The study has been based on the letters written by the bishops to the Lithuanian chancellor. It examines the bishops’ attitude towards Russian contributions, the taxation of Church estates, the arbitrary contributions raised by the Lithuanian army, the introduction of Saxon troops in 1713, the reaction to the king’s policies, and the attitude towards the nationwide uprising against the Saxon troops known as the confederations of Tarnogród and Vilnius. Finally, the bishops’ opinion on Russian mediation and the notorious Silent Sejm, where it was agreed that the liberum veto would be invalid. The bishops of the diocese of Vilnius were rather indifferent to the internal problems of Lithuania. They defended the immunity of the Church estates and disapproved of the introduction of Saxon troops. However, when the confederations were formed, they tried to manoeuvre between the noble and royal camps, not wanting to ruin their reputation on either side. The bishops often spoke on behalf of the diocesan clergy. Therefore, their adopted posture was often the expression of the opinion of the whole diocese’s clergy.","PeriodicalId":42490,"journal":{"name":"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/aph.2022.125.08","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article looks into the participation of the bishop ordinary of the diocese of Vilnius, Kazimierz Konstanty Brzostowski, and his suffragan, Maciej Józef Ancuta, in Lithuanian politics of the period between 1709 and 1717. The study has been based on the letters written by the bishops to the Lithuanian chancellor. It examines the bishops’ attitude towards Russian contributions, the taxation of Church estates, the arbitrary contributions raised by the Lithuanian army, the introduction of Saxon troops in 1713, the reaction to the king’s policies, and the attitude towards the nationwide uprising against the Saxon troops known as the confederations of Tarnogród and Vilnius. Finally, the bishops’ opinion on Russian mediation and the notorious Silent Sejm, where it was agreed that the liberum veto would be invalid. The bishops of the diocese of Vilnius were rather indifferent to the internal problems of Lithuania. They defended the immunity of the Church estates and disapproved of the introduction of Saxon troops. However, when the confederations were formed, they tried to manoeuvre between the noble and royal camps, not wanting to ruin their reputation on either side. The bishops often spoke on behalf of the diocesan clergy. Therefore, their adopted posture was often the expression of the opinion of the whole diocese’s clergy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维尔纽斯教区的主教和1709 - 1717年的立陶宛国内政治:态度、问题和解决办法
本文研究维尔纽斯教区的普通主教Kazimierz Konstanty Brzostowski和他的妇女参政夫人Maciej Józef Ancuta在1709年至1717年期间参与立陶宛政治。这项研究是基于主教们写给立陶宛总理的信。它考察了主教对俄国捐款的态度,教会财产的税收,立陶宛军队的武断捐款,1713年引入撒克逊军队,对国王政策的反应,以及对全国起义的态度反对撒克逊军队被称为Tarnogród和维尔纽斯联盟。最后,主教们对俄罗斯调停和臭名昭著的沉默瑟姆的看法,在瑟姆上,人们一致认为自由否决权无效。维尔纽斯教区的主教们对立陶宛的内部问题相当漠不关心。他们捍卫教会领地的豁免权,不赞成引进撒克逊军队。然而,当联盟成立时,他们试图在贵族和王室阵营之间进行操纵,不想破坏他们在任何一方的声誉。主教们经常代表教区的神职人员发言。因此,他们所采取的姿态往往是整个教区神职人员意见的表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Półrocznik redagowany przez zespół pracowników naukowych Instytutu Historii PAN (do tomu 99 red. Maria Bogucka, od tomu 100 red. Halina Manikowska). Ceny numerów archiwalnych aktualizowane są na bieżąco.
期刊最新文献
Heritage Without Heirs: The German Legacy in Serbia. The Case of the Museum of Danube Swabians The Polish Catholic Church and the Public Memory of the Shoah: Between Mnemonic Backlash and Settling Accounts with the Past Jewish Autobiographical Writing. Memoirs of Moses Vasertsug (c. 1760–1832) Third War of Independence? The Anti-Colonial Dynamics of Ukraine’s Politics of Memory after 2014 on the Example of the National Museum of the History of Ukraine in the Second World War in Kyiv Peripheral (Non)Polishnesses. Museums, Creeping Conflicts, and Transformative Frictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1