Predictors of subjective wellbeing at work for regular employees in Japan

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Journal of Wellbeing Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.5502/ijw.v13i1.2177
Rémy Magnier-Watanabe, Caroline Benton, Philippe Orsini, Toru Uchida
{"title":"Predictors of subjective wellbeing at work for regular employees in Japan","authors":"Rémy Magnier-Watanabe, Caroline Benton, Philippe Orsini, Toru Uchida","doi":"10.5502/ijw.v13i1.2177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Japan has been experiencing a long decline in its workforce. Companies in Japan are eager to retain their existing employees and diversify their recruitment. Employees with long-term and open-ended employment are also switching companies at a greater rate. Consequently, Japanese firms have started paying attention to employee subjective wellbeing, now recognized as a source of higher job performance. This study empirically explores the predictors of subjective wellbeing at work for Japanese regular employees beyond those already identified in Europe and U.S.-centric research. We applied a two-stage design, consisting of interviews and a questionnaire survey to identify those factors that promote subjective wellbeing in Japanese corporations where long-time employment and group cohesiveness and achievement are valued over individual achievement. We identified eight factors affecting subjective wellbeing at work for Japanese regular employees: meaningful work, relationships, culture, workspace, evaluation, time off, financial benefits, and diversity at work. Consequent regression analyses highlighted the discriminant importance of work relationships, evaluation, diversity, workspace, and meaningful work. Eudaimonic and hedonic happiness were found to be caused by different factors. As expected, meaningful work led to eudaimonic satisfaction of life at work in Japan. In contrast hedonic happiness was affected by factors external to work itself, such as work relationships, work evaluation and diversity. Interestingly, diversity at work was found to have an ambivalent effect as it was related to both positive and negative affects at work. These findings will help Japanese companies create a work environment that can maximize regular employees’ wellbeing, job performance, and retention.","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Wellbeing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i1.2177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Japan has been experiencing a long decline in its workforce. Companies in Japan are eager to retain their existing employees and diversify their recruitment. Employees with long-term and open-ended employment are also switching companies at a greater rate. Consequently, Japanese firms have started paying attention to employee subjective wellbeing, now recognized as a source of higher job performance. This study empirically explores the predictors of subjective wellbeing at work for Japanese regular employees beyond those already identified in Europe and U.S.-centric research. We applied a two-stage design, consisting of interviews and a questionnaire survey to identify those factors that promote subjective wellbeing in Japanese corporations where long-time employment and group cohesiveness and achievement are valued over individual achievement. We identified eight factors affecting subjective wellbeing at work for Japanese regular employees: meaningful work, relationships, culture, workspace, evaluation, time off, financial benefits, and diversity at work. Consequent regression analyses highlighted the discriminant importance of work relationships, evaluation, diversity, workspace, and meaningful work. Eudaimonic and hedonic happiness were found to be caused by different factors. As expected, meaningful work led to eudaimonic satisfaction of life at work in Japan. In contrast hedonic happiness was affected by factors external to work itself, such as work relationships, work evaluation and diversity. Interestingly, diversity at work was found to have an ambivalent effect as it was related to both positive and negative affects at work. These findings will help Japanese companies create a work environment that can maximize regular employees’ wellbeing, job performance, and retention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本正式员工工作主观幸福感的预测因素
日本的劳动力长期减少。日本的公司渴望留住现有员工,并实现招聘多元化。长期和无限制就业的员工也在以更高的速度跳槽。因此,日本公司开始关注员工的主观幸福感,这被认为是提高工作绩效的一个来源。这项研究实证地探讨了日本正式员工在工作中主观幸福感的预测因素,而不是以欧洲和美国为中心的研究中已经确定的预测因素。我们采用了两阶段设计,包括访谈和问卷调查,以确定在日本企业中促进主观幸福感的因素,在这些企业中,长期就业、团队凝聚力和成就比个人成就更重要。我们确定了影响日本正式员工工作主观幸福感的八个因素:有意义的工作、人际关系、文化、工作空间、评估、休假、经济利益和工作多样性。随后的回归分析强调了工作关系、评估、多样性、工作空间和有意义的工作的判别重要性。Eudaimonic和享乐主义幸福感是由不同的因素引起的。不出所料,在日本,有意义的工作带来了对工作生活的真正满足。相比之下,享乐幸福感受到工作本身外部因素的影响,如工作关系、工作评价和多样性。有趣的是,工作中的多样性被发现具有矛盾的影响,因为它与工作中的积极和消极影响都有关。这些发现将有助于日本公司创造一个能够最大限度地提高正式员工幸福感、工作表现和留任率的工作环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Wellbeing
International Journal of Wellbeing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A provisional global comparison framework: One hundred psychologically salient ways of conceptualizing and evaluating the world Beyond a single story: The heterogeneity of human flourishing in 22 countries The brief thriving scale: Assessing the ability to learn, grow, and find benefits in stressful events Well-being and ill-being on campus Brief computerised self-help interventions, the “Miracle Question,” and the moderating effects of openness-to-experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1