Brendan Case, Victor Counted, Jim Ritchie-Dunham, Richard Cowden, Christina Gibson, Hayami Koga, Tim Lomas, Noah Padgett
Contemporary cross-cultural research on flourishing and development has been limited by a focus on Western populations and typically Western priorities, and by attention to only a few indicators of flourishing, such as life satisfaction, life expectancy, or GDP per capita. This paper highlights some significant challenges for robust cross-national and cross-cultural research on the domains and drivers of flourishing. Using data from the recently proposed Global Comparison Framework and the Gallup World Poll, we explore the within- and between-country heterogeneity of flourishing and its determinants across the 22 countries which are the subject of the Global Flourishing Study. Sources of heterogeneity considered include potential tradeoffs among domains of flourishing; the effects of cultural differences on the conceptualization and actualization of flourishing; and the cultural specificity of core analytical concepts, including “life evaluation” and “nation.”
{"title":"Beyond a single story: The heterogeneity of human flourishing in 22 countries","authors":"Brendan Case, Victor Counted, Jim Ritchie-Dunham, Richard Cowden, Christina Gibson, Hayami Koga, Tim Lomas, Noah Padgett","doi":"10.5502/ijw.v13i4.3555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i4.3555","url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary cross-cultural research on flourishing and development has been limited by a focus on Western populations and typically Western priorities, and by attention to only a few indicators of flourishing, such as life satisfaction, life expectancy, or GDP per capita. This paper highlights some significant challenges for robust cross-national and cross-cultural research on the domains and drivers of flourishing. Using data from the recently proposed Global Comparison Framework and the Gallup World Poll, we explore the within- and between-country heterogeneity of flourishing and its determinants across the 22 countries which are the subject of the Global Flourishing Study. Sources of heterogeneity considered include potential tradeoffs among domains of flourishing; the effects of cultural differences on the conceptualization and actualization of flourishing; and the cultural specificity of core analytical concepts, including “life evaluation” and “nation.”","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135870952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Having long been critiqued as Western-centric, psychology is increasingly attuned to the need to conduct more cross-cultural research. However, there is relatively little clarity, consensus, or nuance on how best to conceptually “carve up” and assess different peoples and places. Arguably the two most common distinctions are East versus West, and differentiating countries into low, middle, and high income groups. However, both categorizations have their issues, not to mention that overreliance on these hardly does justice to the complexity of the world. To encourage more nuanced and granular thinking, this paper presents a provisional Global Comparison Framework, a curated list of one hundred variables on which countries can be differentiated. These have been selected primarily as: (a) psychologically salient (e.g., likely to influence outcomes such as mental health); (b) having publicly available data from reputable organizations (e.g., the World Bank); and (c) having relatively global coverage (e.g., including at least two thirds of nations). However, the framework is also offered as an iterative work-in-progress that will be refined in relation to feedback. Similarly, in recognition that these indicators are not the only relevant variables, and that their selection is inevitably influenced by the author’s own values and interests, it is hoped that the paper might inspire scholars to create their own version of this kind of framework, featuring variables they would prefer to see included. Finally, and more broadly, this framework will ideally encourage and facilitate greater cross-cultural consideration and more nuanced investigations across the field.
{"title":"A provisional global comparison framework: One hundred psychologically salient ways of conceptualizing and evaluating the world","authors":"Tim Lomas","doi":"10.5502/ijw.v13i4.3421","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i4.3421","url":null,"abstract":"Having long been critiqued as Western-centric, psychology is increasingly attuned to the need to conduct more cross-cultural research. However, there is relatively little clarity, consensus, or nuance on how best to conceptually “carve up” and assess different peoples and places. Arguably the two most common distinctions are East versus West, and differentiating countries into low, middle, and high income groups. However, both categorizations have their issues, not to mention that overreliance on these hardly does justice to the complexity of the world. To encourage more nuanced and granular thinking, this paper presents a provisional Global Comparison Framework, a curated list of one hundred variables on which countries can be differentiated. These have been selected primarily as: (a) psychologically salient (e.g., likely to influence outcomes such as mental health); (b) having publicly available data from reputable organizations (e.g., the World Bank); and (c) having relatively global coverage (e.g., including at least two thirds of nations). However, the framework is also offered as an iterative work-in-progress that will be refined in relation to feedback. Similarly, in recognition that these indicators are not the only relevant variables, and that their selection is inevitably influenced by the author’s own values and interests, it is hoped that the paper might inspire scholars to create their own version of this kind of framework, featuring variables they would prefer to see included. Finally, and more broadly, this framework will ideally encourage and facilitate greater cross-cultural consideration and more nuanced investigations across the field.","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135869967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bruce Smith, Kelly Albonico, Naila deCruz-Dixon, Alvin Phan, Anne Guzman, Kaitlyn Schodt
While much research has focused on the ability to recover from the negative effects of stress, little has examined our potential for benefitting from stressful events. The current studies validated the Brief Thriving Scale (BTS), which assesses the ability to learn, grow, and benefit from stress. Participants were 855 undergraduate who completed the BTS, a battery of health-related measures, and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS; Smith et al., 2008), which assesses resilience as the ability to bounce back from stress. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated the construct validity of the BTS and correlation analyses supported convergent and divergent validity. Multiple regression analyses showed that the BTS was consistently related to better health when controlling for the BRS. While the BRS was a stronger predictor of negative mental health (e.g., lower negative emotion, depression), the BTS was a stronger predictor of positive mental health (e.g., higher positive emotion, meaning) and general physical health.
虽然很多研究都集中在从压力的负面影响中恢复的能力上，但很少有人研究我们从压力事件中获益的潜力。目前的研究证实了短暂繁荣量表(BTS)，它评估了学习、成长和从压力中受益的能力。参与者为855名大学生，他们完成了BTS、一系列与健康相关的测量和简短弹性量表(BRS;Smith et al.， 2008)，它将弹性评估为从压力中恢复的能力。探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析证实了BTS的结构效度，相关分析支持收敛效度和发散效度。多元回归分析表明，在控制BRS的情况下，BTS与更好的健康状况始终相关。虽然BRS是负面心理健康(例如，较低的负面情绪，抑郁)的较强预测因子，但BTS是积极心理健康(例如，较高的积极情绪，意义)和一般身体健康的较强预测因子。
{"title":"The brief thriving scale: Assessing the ability to learn, grow, and find benefits in stressful events","authors":"Bruce Smith, Kelly Albonico, Naila deCruz-Dixon, Alvin Phan, Anne Guzman, Kaitlyn Schodt","doi":"10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2801","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2801","url":null,"abstract":"While much research has focused on the ability to recover from the negative effects of stress, little has examined our potential for benefitting from stressful events. The current studies validated the Brief Thriving Scale (BTS), which assesses the ability to learn, grow, and benefit from stress. Participants were 855 undergraduate who completed the BTS, a battery of health-related measures, and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS; Smith et al., 2008), which assesses resilience as the ability to bounce back from stress. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated the construct validity of the BTS and correlation analyses supported convergent and divergent validity. Multiple regression analyses showed that the BTS was consistently related to better health when controlling for the BRS. While the BRS was a stronger predictor of negative mental health (e.g., lower negative emotion, depression), the BTS was a stronger predictor of positive mental health (e.g., higher positive emotion, meaning) and general physical health.","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136129457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Giving money to others feels good. In the past years, this claim has received strong empirical support from psychology and neuroscience. It is now standard to use the label ‘warm glow feelings’ to refer to the pleasure people take from giving, and many explanations of apparently altruistic behavior appeal to these internal rewards. But what exactly are warm glow feelings? Why do people experience them? In order to further our understanding of the phenomenon, we ran two studies: a recall task in which participants were asked to remember a donation they made, and a donation task in which participants were given the opportunity to make a donation before reporting their affective states. In both studies, correlational and experimental evidence converge towards the conclusion that, if the nature of the warm glow is straightforward, its source is multifaceted. Regarding the nature of ‘warm glow’, the pleasure people took in giving was mainly predicted by one particular positive emotion (‘joyful feelings’) and was indeed described by participants as a ‘warm’ sensation. Regarding the underlying psychological mechanisms, ‘warm glow’ feelings were elicited both by positive appraisals regarding the donor’s moral character and positive appraisals regarding the actual impact of the donor’s donation on the welfare of others. We discuss the implications of these findings for the role of positive emotions in explaining why people give.
{"title":"Is the warm glow actually warm? An experimental investigation into the nature and determinants of warm glow feelings","authors":"Robin Bianchi, Florian Cova, Emma Tieffenbach","doi":"10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2565","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2565","url":null,"abstract":"Giving money to others feels good. In the past years, this claim has received strong empirical support from psychology and neuroscience. It is now standard to use the label ‘warm glow feelings’ to refer to the pleasure people take from giving, and many explanations of apparently altruistic behavior appeal to these internal rewards. But what exactly are warm glow feelings? Why do people experience them? In order to further our understanding of the phenomenon, we ran two studies: a recall task in which participants were asked to remember a donation they made, and a donation task in which participants were given the opportunity to make a donation before reporting their affective states. In both studies, correlational and experimental evidence converge towards the conclusion that, if the nature of the warm glow is straightforward, its source is multifaceted. Regarding the nature of ‘warm glow’, the pleasure people took in giving was mainly predicted by one particular positive emotion (‘joyful feelings’) and was indeed described by participants as a ‘warm’ sensation. Regarding the underlying psychological mechanisms, ‘warm glow’ feelings were elicited both by positive appraisals regarding the donor’s moral character and positive appraisals regarding the actual impact of the donor’s donation on the welfare of others. We discuss the implications of these findings for the role of positive emotions in explaining why people give.","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136345073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and wellbeing of graduate students at universities and research institutions around the world. In so doing, it assesses the intra-individual effects of pandemic-related restrictions on a key cohort in academia: doctoral candidates. We trace this cohort’s ability to adapt to the pandemic over a two-year period by investigating their quality of mental health, indicators of mental health disorders, and indicators of wellbeing and resilience. A consensual qualitative research methodology was adopted when analyzing data gathered during April 2020 and February 2022. The study uses Ecological Systems Theory as a framework, providing insights into how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the wellbeing and mental health of graduate students in myriad ways. The researchers found that while the pandemic negatively affected cognitive processes, a significant proportion of doctoral candidates exhibited remarkable levels of resistance and reconfiguration resilience and short-term improvements in mental health during the period under investigation.
{"title":"Initial findings of a longitudinal study of wellbeing and mental health among graduate students around the world: The intra-individual impact of a pandemic","authors":"Basil Cahusac de Caux, Ivanna Shubina","doi":"10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2775","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2775","url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and wellbeing of graduate students at universities and research institutions around the world. In so doing, it assesses the intra-individual effects of pandemic-related restrictions on a key cohort in academia: doctoral candidates. We trace this cohort’s ability to adapt to the pandemic over a two-year period by investigating their quality of mental health, indicators of mental health disorders, and indicators of wellbeing and resilience. A consensual qualitative research methodology was adopted when analyzing data gathered during April 2020 and February 2022. The study uses Ecological Systems Theory as a framework, providing insights into how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the wellbeing and mental health of graduate students in myriad ways. The researchers found that while the pandemic negatively affected cognitive processes, a significant proportion of doctoral candidates exhibited remarkable levels of resistance and reconfiguration resilience and short-term improvements in mental health during the period under investigation.","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136346145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplementary materials for:Is the warm glow actually warm? An experimental investigation into the nature and determinants of warm glow feelings","authors":"Robin Bianchi, Florian Cova, Emma Tieffenbach","doi":"10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2565s","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2565s","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136346146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brief, self-help positive psychology interventions (PPIs) have certain advantages over longer, guided interventions (e.g. higher completion rates). The “Miracle Question(s)” – the most famous intervention in solution-focused therapy and coaching – appears to be a promising brief, self-help PPI. However, very little experimental research on the “Miracle Question” has been conducted. The present study investigated the effects of a brief self-help MQ intervention on several aspects of wellbeing, including hope, expectancy, goal clarity and affect. The MQ intervention was compared against both a problem-focused and neutral coaching approach. Three online experiments were conducted with participants aged 18-76 across the world. Two experiments focused on “life problems” whilst the third focused on problems in interpersonal relationships. Results suggested that all three interventions raise expectancy in the context of life (but not relationship) problems. However, as hypothesised, the relative effects of such interventions may depend on openness-to-experience. At high[low] levels of openness-to-experience, the MQ technique was more[less] effective than the problem-focused or neutral coaching interventions, at least for some aspects of wellbeing. The study sheds much-needed light on the MQ technique and on brief self-help interventions. Widely recommended as a means of enhancing wellbeing, the MQ technique may not be universally effective (in a self-help format) and requires further investigation. On the other hand, the study suggests that brief self-help computerized PPIs may indeed be enthusiastically adopted, especially when compared with longer interventions.
{"title":"Brief computerised self-help interventions, the “Miracle Question,” and the moderating effects of openness-to-experience","authors":"Adam Abdulla","doi":"10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2799","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2799","url":null,"abstract":"Brief, self-help positive psychology interventions (PPIs) have certain advantages over longer, guided interventions (e.g. higher completion rates). The “Miracle Question(s)” – the most famous intervention in solution-focused therapy and coaching – appears to be a promising brief, self-help PPI. However, very little experimental research on the “Miracle Question” has been conducted. The present study investigated the effects of a brief self-help MQ intervention on several aspects of wellbeing, including hope, expectancy, goal clarity and affect. The MQ intervention was compared against both a problem-focused and neutral coaching approach. Three online experiments were conducted with participants aged 18-76 across the world. Two experiments focused on “life problems” whilst the third focused on problems in interpersonal relationships. Results suggested that all three interventions raise expectancy in the context of life (but not relationship) problems. However, as hypothesised, the relative effects of such interventions may depend on openness-to-experience. At high[low] levels of openness-to-experience, the MQ technique was more[less] effective than the problem-focused or neutral coaching interventions, at least for some aspects of wellbeing. The study sheds much-needed light on the MQ technique and on brief self-help interventions. Widely recommended as a means of enhancing wellbeing, the MQ technique may not be universally effective (in a self-help format) and requires further investigation. On the other hand, the study suggests that brief self-help computerized PPIs may indeed be enthusiastically adopted, especially when compared with longer interventions.","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136345064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christelle Liversage, Marié P. Wissing, Lusilda Schutte
With the demanding pace and challenges of the world today, there is an amplified need to identify ways of attaining well-being in the context of the workplace and relational domains of life. As work and interpersonal relationships are key domains of life where people set goals and find meaning in their search for well-being, interventions towards the promotion of well-being in these domains have become a strategic and critical priority to meet the demands of an everchanging world. Interventions to enhance well-being through goals and /or meaning in various domains of life are dispersed across disciplines, highlighting the need for a comprehensive overview of the current state of the art to advance its progress. This study aimed to explore through a scoping review existing literature on interventions to enhance goals and meaning to promote well-being in the life domains of work and interpersonal relationships. Using specific search terms in each of these domains, a literature search of scientific articles was conducted via various search platforms and databases. Thirty-eight articles were identified, scrutinized, and with the aid of clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria a final number of 27 articles extracted. No interventions were found on the concordance of goals and meaning in either of the two domains. Goals and meaning interventions, in both domains, used diverse strategies, leading to various hedonic and eudaimonic outcomes. Findings per study are described in terms of target groups, intervention strategies and outcomes. Through the indication of a major gap in research regarding interventions aiming at the alignment or harmonisation of goals and what is meaningful to people, this study points to further possibilities for research on the development and evaluation of interventions that aim to enhance the alignment of goals and meaning in the work and especially the interpersonal relationships domains.
{"title":"Promotion of well-being in work and interpersonal relationships: A scoping review of goals and meaning interventions","authors":"Christelle Liversage, Marié P. Wissing, Lusilda Schutte","doi":"10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2941","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2941","url":null,"abstract":"With the demanding pace and challenges of the world today, there is an amplified need to identify ways of attaining well-being in the context of the workplace and relational domains of life. As work and interpersonal relationships are key domains of life where people set goals and find meaning in their search for well-being, interventions towards the promotion of well-being in these domains have become a strategic and critical priority to meet the demands of an everchanging world. Interventions to enhance well-being through goals and /or meaning in various domains of life are dispersed across disciplines, highlighting the need for a comprehensive overview of the current state of the art to advance its progress. This study aimed to explore through a scoping review existing literature on interventions to enhance goals and meaning to promote well-being in the life domains of work and interpersonal relationships. Using specific search terms in each of these domains, a literature search of scientific articles was conducted via various search platforms and databases. Thirty-eight articles were identified, scrutinized, and with the aid of clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria a final number of 27 articles extracted. No interventions were found on the concordance of goals and meaning in either of the two domains. Goals and meaning interventions, in both domains, used diverse strategies, leading to various hedonic and eudaimonic outcomes. Findings per study are described in terms of target groups, intervention strategies and outcomes. Through the indication of a major gap in research regarding interventions aiming at the alignment or harmonisation of goals and what is meaningful to people, this study points to further possibilities for research on the development and evaluation of interventions that aim to enhance the alignment of goals and meaning in the work and especially the interpersonal relationships domains.","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136345072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplementary information for: Brief computerised self-help interventions, the “Miracle Question,” and the moderating effects of openness-to-experience","authors":"Adam Abdulla","doi":"10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2799s","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2799s","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136346147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplementary information for: Well-being and ill-being on campus","authors":"Philip S. Morrison, Ivy Liu, Dylon Zeng","doi":"10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2785s","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i3.2785s","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136345070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：