Perceptions of medical students on a three-step teaching approach to promote active learning in embryology

S. Kore, G. Begum
{"title":"Perceptions of medical students on a three-step teaching approach to promote active learning in embryology","authors":"S. Kore, G. Begum","doi":"10.4103/njca.njca_43_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The study of embryology is an essential component of the anatomy course during the preclinical years of medical education. It is usually perceived as difficult to comprehend due to the rapid three-dimensional changes that occur during fetal life. Visual representation while explaining the developmental process can facilitate comprehension. Active discussion with peers is another important learning aid that can help with better retention of the concepts taught in embryology. The present study was conducted with an objective to evaluate perceptions about the three-step active learning in embryology using “do it yourself (DIY) construction models” as props, reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) sessions, and case discussions. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 80 students attending the embryology lecture on the gastrointestinal tract development. In step-1, the traditional lecture was delivered using a PowerPoint presentation which was complemented by three-dimensional (3D) visualization using “DIY” construction models used as props. Step-2 RPT session step-3 application exercises using real-time cases. Feedback was taken on a questionnaire administered using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: The descriptive analysis of the feedback revealed that most of the students were satisfied with the different active teaching strategies employed to conduct the sessions. The Chi-square test analysis showed a significant association between the questions posed in the feedback questionnaire. Conclusion: Our study provides insights into the importance of multiple active teaching techniques in learning embryology. The impact usage of props (DIY models) enhanced comprehension, peer teaching sessions helped the students to bridge the cognitive gaps, and case-based learning promoted critical thinking, and problems-solving skills.","PeriodicalId":52750,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njca.njca_43_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study of embryology is an essential component of the anatomy course during the preclinical years of medical education. It is usually perceived as difficult to comprehend due to the rapid three-dimensional changes that occur during fetal life. Visual representation while explaining the developmental process can facilitate comprehension. Active discussion with peers is another important learning aid that can help with better retention of the concepts taught in embryology. The present study was conducted with an objective to evaluate perceptions about the three-step active learning in embryology using “do it yourself (DIY) construction models” as props, reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) sessions, and case discussions. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 80 students attending the embryology lecture on the gastrointestinal tract development. In step-1, the traditional lecture was delivered using a PowerPoint presentation which was complemented by three-dimensional (3D) visualization using “DIY” construction models used as props. Step-2 RPT session step-3 application exercises using real-time cases. Feedback was taken on a questionnaire administered using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: The descriptive analysis of the feedback revealed that most of the students were satisfied with the different active teaching strategies employed to conduct the sessions. The Chi-square test analysis showed a significant association between the questions posed in the feedback questionnaire. Conclusion: Our study provides insights into the importance of multiple active teaching techniques in learning embryology. The impact usage of props (DIY models) enhanced comprehension, peer teaching sessions helped the students to bridge the cognitive gaps, and case-based learning promoted critical thinking, and problems-solving skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生对促进胚胎学主动学习的三步教学法的看法
背景:胚胎学研究是临床前医学教育中解剖学课程的重要组成部分。它通常被认为是难以理解的,由于快速的三维变化,发生在胎儿生命。在解释发展过程时,视觉表现可以促进理解。与同伴的积极讨论是另一个重要的学习辅助手段,可以帮助更好地记住胚胎学中教授的概念。本研究旨在评估胚胎学三步主动学习的认知,采用“自己动手(DIY)构建模型”作为道具,互惠同伴辅导(RPT)课程和案例讨论。方法:对80名参加胃肠道发育胚胎学讲座的学生进行描述性横断面研究。在第一步中,传统的讲座采用ppt的形式进行,并辅以三维可视化的方式,使用“DIY”的建筑模型作为道具。步骤2 RPT会话步骤3使用实时案例的应用程序练习。反馈是采用李克特5分量表进行的问卷调查。结果:对反馈的描述性分析显示,大多数学生对采用不同的主动教学策略进行教学感到满意。卡方检验分析显示,反馈问卷所提问题之间存在显著相关性。结论:我们的研究揭示了多种主动教学方法在胚胎学学习中的重要性。道具(DIY模型)的使用提高了理解能力,同伴教学帮助学生弥合认知差距,基于案例的学习促进了批判性思维和解决问题的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Incidence of Yq Microdeletion among Chattishgarh Population and Cast Based Distribution Morphometric study of nasal parameters in undergraduates at a medical university in central Uttar Pradesh A cadaveric series on urovascular anomalies Insertional footprint of achilles tendon on calcaneal tuberosity in South Indian population: A cadaveric study Novel finding: Hyo-mandibular ligament- A cadaveric study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1