Using image processing and automated classification models to classify microscopic gram stain images

Kris Kristensen , Logan Morgan Ward , Mads Lause Mogensen , Simon Lebech Cichosz
{"title":"Using image processing and automated classification models to classify microscopic gram stain images","authors":"Kris Kristensen ,&nbsp;Logan Morgan Ward ,&nbsp;Mads Lause Mogensen ,&nbsp;Simon Lebech Cichosz","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2022.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><p>Fast and correct classification of bacterial samples are important for accurate diagnostics and treatment. Manual microscopic interpretation of Gram stain samples is both time consuming and operator dependent. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for developing an automated algorithm for the classification of microscopic Gram stain images.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed and tested two algorithms (using image processing an Casual Probabilistic Network (CPN) and a Random Forest (RF) classification) for the automated classification of Gram stain images. A dataset of 660 images including 33 microbial species (32 bacteria and one fungus) was split into training, validation, and test sets. The algorithms were evaluated based on their ability to correctly classify samples and general characteristics such as aggregation and morphology.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The CPN correctly classified 633/792 images to achieve an overall accuracy of 80% compared to the RF which correctly classified 782/792 images to achieve an overall accuracy of 99% (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The CPN performed well when distinguishing between GN and GP, with an accuracy of 95% (731/768). The RF also performed well in distinguishing between GN and GP, achieving an accuracy of 99% (767/768) (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings from this study show promising results regarding the potential for an automated algorithm for the classification of microscopic Gram stain images.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72670,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990022000428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background and Objective

Fast and correct classification of bacterial samples are important for accurate diagnostics and treatment. Manual microscopic interpretation of Gram stain samples is both time consuming and operator dependent. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for developing an automated algorithm for the classification of microscopic Gram stain images.

Methods

We developed and tested two algorithms (using image processing an Casual Probabilistic Network (CPN) and a Random Forest (RF) classification) for the automated classification of Gram stain images. A dataset of 660 images including 33 microbial species (32 bacteria and one fungus) was split into training, validation, and test sets. The algorithms were evaluated based on their ability to correctly classify samples and general characteristics such as aggregation and morphology.

Results

The CPN correctly classified 633/792 images to achieve an overall accuracy of 80% compared to the RF which correctly classified 782/792 images to achieve an overall accuracy of 99% (p < 0.001). The CPN performed well when distinguishing between GN and GP, with an accuracy of 95% (731/768). The RF also performed well in distinguishing between GN and GP, achieving an accuracy of 99% (767/768) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The findings from this study show promising results regarding the potential for an automated algorithm for the classification of microscopic Gram stain images.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用图像处理和自动分类模型对显微革兰氏染色图像进行分类
背景与目的快速、正确的细菌分类对准确诊断和治疗具有重要意义。革兰氏染色样品的人工显微解释既耗时又依赖于操作人员。本研究的目的是研究开发一种用于显微革兰氏染色图像分类的自动算法的潜力。方法我们开发并测试了两种用于革兰氏染色图像自动分类的算法(使用图像处理随机概率网络(CPN)和随机森林(RF)分类)。包含33种微生物(32种细菌和1种真菌)的660幅图像的数据集被分为训练集、验证集和测试集。这些算法是根据它们正确分类样本的能力和一般特征(如聚集和形态)来评估的。结果CPN正确分类633/792张图像,总体准确率为80%,而RF正确分类782/792张图像,总体准确率为99% (p <0.001)。CPN在区分GN和GP时表现良好,准确率为95%(731/768)。RF在区分GN和GP方面也表现良好,准确率达到99% (767/768)(p <0.001)。结论本研究的结果显示了一种用于显微革兰氏染色图像分类的自动化算法的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fostering digital health literacy to enhance trust and improve health outcomes Machine learning from real data: A mental health registry case study ResfEANet: ResNet-fused External Attention Network for Tuberculosis Diagnosis using Chest X-ray Images Role-playing recovery in social virtual worlds: Adult use of child avatars as PTSD therapy Comparative evaluation of low-cost 3D scanning devices for ear acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1