Clindamycin: An adjunct option in drug-resistant staphylococcal infections

S. Garg, R. Mahajan, Zobiakhlui Chhakchhuak, Vanlal Tluanpuii
{"title":"Clindamycin: An adjunct option in drug-resistant staphylococcal infections","authors":"S. Garg, R. Mahajan, Zobiakhlui Chhakchhuak, Vanlal Tluanpuii","doi":"10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_75_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The emergence of methicillin resistance among staphylococcal infections has led to increasing demand for the use of safe and effective agents to treat such infections. Clindamycin is one such drug which is gaining the interest of clinicians because of its excellent pharmacokinetic properties. However, the widespread use of macrolide–lincosamide–streptogramin B antibiotics has led to inducible or constitutive resistance which is a major concern. In vitro routine tests for clindamycin, susceptibility may fail to detect inducible clindamycin resistance leading to treatment failure, thus requiring a simple D test to detect such resistance on a routine basis. Aim of the Study: The aim of this study was to find the prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various clinical samples. Materials and Methods: One thousand isolates isolates of S. aureus obtained from various clinical samples were subjected to routine antibiotic susceptibility testing including cefoxitin (30 μg) using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method. Inducible clindamycin resistance was tested by the “D test” as per CLSI guidelines. Results and Conclusion: Out of 1000 isolates of S. aureus, 556 (55.6%) were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus and 444 (44.4%) were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The total percentage of inducible clindamycin resistance was found to be 21.9%. Inducible clindamycin resistance was found to be higher among MRSA making treatment of such infections more difficult. D test is a simple test which can be included in routine testing of antibiotic susceptibility for staphylococcal isolates to detect inducible clindamycin resistance so as to avoid treatment failure and aid in the judicious use of this drug.","PeriodicalId":10321,"journal":{"name":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"242 - 245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_75_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The emergence of methicillin resistance among staphylococcal infections has led to increasing demand for the use of safe and effective agents to treat such infections. Clindamycin is one such drug which is gaining the interest of clinicians because of its excellent pharmacokinetic properties. However, the widespread use of macrolide–lincosamide–streptogramin B antibiotics has led to inducible or constitutive resistance which is a major concern. In vitro routine tests for clindamycin, susceptibility may fail to detect inducible clindamycin resistance leading to treatment failure, thus requiring a simple D test to detect such resistance on a routine basis. Aim of the Study: The aim of this study was to find the prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various clinical samples. Materials and Methods: One thousand isolates isolates of S. aureus obtained from various clinical samples were subjected to routine antibiotic susceptibility testing including cefoxitin (30 μg) using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method. Inducible clindamycin resistance was tested by the “D test” as per CLSI guidelines. Results and Conclusion: Out of 1000 isolates of S. aureus, 556 (55.6%) were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus and 444 (44.4%) were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The total percentage of inducible clindamycin resistance was found to be 21.9%. Inducible clindamycin resistance was found to be higher among MRSA making treatment of such infections more difficult. D test is a simple test which can be included in routine testing of antibiotic susceptibility for staphylococcal isolates to detect inducible clindamycin resistance so as to avoid treatment failure and aid in the judicious use of this drug.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克林霉素:耐药葡萄球菌感染的辅助选择
引言:葡萄球菌感染中甲氧西林耐药性的出现导致对使用安全有效的药物治疗此类感染的需求增加。克林霉素就是这样一种药物,由于其优异的药代动力学特性而引起临床医生的兴趣。然而,大环内酯-林可酰胺-链脲菌素B抗生素的广泛使用导致了诱导型或组成型耐药性,这是一个主要问题。在克林霉素的体外常规测试中,易感性可能无法检测到诱导型克林霉素耐药性,从而导致治疗失败,因此需要简单的D测试来常规检测这种耐药性。研究目的:本研究的目的是了解不同临床样本中金黄色葡萄球菌分离株中诱导型克林霉素耐药性的患病率。材料和方法:采用Kirby–Bauer纸片扩散法对从不同临床样品中分离的1000株金黄色葡萄球菌进行常规抗生素敏感性测试,包括头孢西丁(30μg)。根据CLSI指南,采用“D试验”检测诱导型克林霉素耐药性。结果与结论:在1000株金黄色葡萄球菌中,556株(55.6%)对甲氧西林敏感,444株(44.4%)对甲硫西林耐药。诱导型克林霉素耐药性的总百分比为21.9%。MRSA中的诱导型克林霉素耐药性较高,这使得治疗此类感染更加困难。D试验是一种简单的试验,可用于葡萄球菌分离株抗生素敏感性的常规试验,以检测可诱导的克林霉素耐药性,从而避免治疗失败并有助于明智地使用该药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Standardization of objective structured practical examination in terms of validity and reliability in biochemistry: Our first experience Occupational stress: An impediment to quality nurse–Patient relationship – A rapid review COVID-19 positivity in the COVID suspect and green zones of a large emergency department during the first wave of the pandemic in South India Healthcare-seeking behavior and awareness regarding snakebites and its first-aid management among tribal women in rural Maharashtra Hippocratic oath in dentistry: An insight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1