Auditors’ self-assessment of engagement quality and the role of stakeholder priority

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting and Business Research Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI:10.1080/00014788.2021.2001638
Limei Che, E. Myllymäki, Tobias Svanström
{"title":"Auditors’ self-assessment of engagement quality and the role of stakeholder priority","authors":"Limei Che, E. Myllymäki, Tobias Svanström","doi":"10.1080/00014788.2021.2001638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates auditors’ assessment of the quality of their own audit engagements, utilising survey data gathered from a Big Four audit firm in Sweden. We first examine to what extent auditors’ self-reported audit quality threatening behaviours (AQTBs) in the audit process are reflected in their assessment of overall audit quality (OAQ). The results indicate that AQTBs overall and all individual AQTBs are associated with quality assessment, though with variations in their significances. Second, we examine whether AQTBs and OAQ are associated with an auditor’s stakeholder priority, i.e. which stakeholder the auditor considers as her highest priority in the audit work. We find that auditors who consider the employer as the highest priority report more AQTBs. However, priorities are not related to OAQ. Furthermore, auditors prioritising the client or employer tend to assess the overall audit quality as being higher than what the AQTBs would suggest (i.e. they over-assess the quality). Interestingly, the findings regarding priorities are only evident among partners. In sum, the findings of this study provide important insights on how auditors themselves assess their audit quality, and on the role of auditors’ stakeholder priorities.","PeriodicalId":7054,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and Business Research","volume":"53 1","pages":"335 - 375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2021.2001638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study investigates auditors’ assessment of the quality of their own audit engagements, utilising survey data gathered from a Big Four audit firm in Sweden. We first examine to what extent auditors’ self-reported audit quality threatening behaviours (AQTBs) in the audit process are reflected in their assessment of overall audit quality (OAQ). The results indicate that AQTBs overall and all individual AQTBs are associated with quality assessment, though with variations in their significances. Second, we examine whether AQTBs and OAQ are associated with an auditor’s stakeholder priority, i.e. which stakeholder the auditor considers as her highest priority in the audit work. We find that auditors who consider the employer as the highest priority report more AQTBs. However, priorities are not related to OAQ. Furthermore, auditors prioritising the client or employer tend to assess the overall audit quality as being higher than what the AQTBs would suggest (i.e. they over-assess the quality). Interestingly, the findings regarding priorities are only evident among partners. In sum, the findings of this study provide important insights on how auditors themselves assess their audit quality, and on the role of auditors’ stakeholder priorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计人员对参与质量的自我评估和利益攸关方优先事项的作用
这项研究利用从瑞典四大审计公司收集的调查数据,调查了审计师对自己审计业务质量的评估。我们首先考察审计师在审计过程中自我报告的审计质量威胁行为(AQTB)在多大程度上反映在他们对整体审计质量(OAQ)的评估中。结果表明,总体和所有个体的AQTB都与质量评估有关,尽管其意义存在差异。其次,我们检查AQTB和OAQ是否与审计师的利益相关者优先级相关,即审计师认为哪个利益相关者是她在审计工作中的最高优先级。我们发现,将雇主视为最高优先级的审计师报告的AQTB更多。然而,优先事项与审调处无关。此外,优先考虑客户或雇主的审计师倾向于评估整体审计质量高于AQTB的建议(即他们过度评估质量)。有趣的是,关于优先事项的调查结果只在合作伙伴中明显可见。总之,这项研究的结果为审计师自己如何评估其审计质量以及审计师利益相关者优先事项的作用提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting and Business Research publishes papers containing a substantial and original contribution to knowledge. Papers may cover any area of accounting, broadly defined and including corporate governance, auditing and taxation. However the focus must be accounting, rather than (corporate) finance or general management. Authors may take a theoretical or an empirical approach, using either quantitative or qualitative methods. They may aim to contribute to developing and understanding the role of accounting in business. Papers should be rigorous but also written in a way that makes them intelligible to a wide range of academics and, where appropriate, practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Varied international practice in accounting for extractive activities Corporate governance, firm strategy disclosure, and executive compensation The impact of the JOBS act on the costs of going public: evidence from long-term audit costs Escaping ‘Groundhog Day’: the transformative possibilities of reconceptualising audit Reflections on the past, present and future of the academic/professional interface in accounting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1