Legítima defensa de animales

Luís Greco
{"title":"Legítima defensa de animales","authors":"Luís Greco","doi":"10.17230/NFP.15.92.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If we recognize that animals have rights, even minimal and rudimentary as the right to not to be killed without an acceptable reason or the right to live without constant or repetitive pain (§ 17 Animal Protection Law), then the consequence is that they would be covered by the right to self­defense. Such rights would configure the attacked subjective right, which is exercised by humans instead of animals and they do so in their interest based on a legitimate third party’s defense. The legitimate defense in favor of animals is, however, less extensive than the one which is carried out in favor of a human being, according to the thesis I defend in this article.","PeriodicalId":33735,"journal":{"name":"Nuevo Foro Penal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuevo Foro Penal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17230/NFP.15.92.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If we recognize that animals have rights, even minimal and rudimentary as the right to not to be killed without an acceptable reason or the right to live without constant or repetitive pain (§ 17 Animal Protection Law), then the consequence is that they would be covered by the right to self­defense. Such rights would configure the attacked subjective right, which is exercised by humans instead of animals and they do so in their interest based on a legitimate third party’s defense. The legitimate defense in favor of animals is, however, less extensive than the one which is carried out in favor of a human being, according to the thesis I defend in this article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动物的合法防卫
如果我们承认动物有权利,即使是最小和最基本的权利,如没有可接受的理由不被杀害的权利,或在没有持续或重复痛苦的情况下生活的权利(《动物保护法》第17条),那么结果就是它们将被自卫权所涵盖。这种权利将构成被攻击的主观权利,由人类而不是动物行使,并且基于合法的第三方辩护,他们这样做是为了自己的利益。然而,根据我在本文中捍卫的论点,支持动物的合法辩护不如支持人类的合法辩护广泛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Breve estudio dogmático del delito de extorsión en el Código Penal del Estado de Puebla, México La fuga de presos: un delito de dudosa constitucionalidad Principio de oportunidad de la acción procesal penal y justicia restaurativa Dolor, poder y angustia: la estructura discursiva de la proporcionalidad en la judicialización de la política criminal colombiana Derecho de corrección a menores
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1