Jewish Law in the Gospels in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Biblical Theology Bulletin Pub Date : 2021-08-08 DOI:10.1177/01461079211034301
L. Schiffman
{"title":"Jewish Law in the Gospels in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls","authors":"L. Schiffman","doi":"10.1177/01461079211034301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines a number of specific examples of halakhic (Jewish legal) matters discussed in the New Testament that are also dealt with in the Dead Sea Scrolls. This paper compares and contrasts the rulings of these two traditions, as well as the Pharisaic views, showing that the Jewish legal views of the Gospels are for the most part lenient views to the left of those of the Pharisees, whereas those of the Dead Sea Scrolls represent a stricter view, to the right of the Pharisaic views. Ultimately, in the halakhic debate of the first century ce, the self-understanding of the earliest Christians was very different from that of the sect of the Dead Sea Scrolls.","PeriodicalId":41921,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Theology Bulletin","volume":"51 1","pages":"226 - 233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Theology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461079211034301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines a number of specific examples of halakhic (Jewish legal) matters discussed in the New Testament that are also dealt with in the Dead Sea Scrolls. This paper compares and contrasts the rulings of these two traditions, as well as the Pharisaic views, showing that the Jewish legal views of the Gospels are for the most part lenient views to the left of those of the Pharisees, whereas those of the Dead Sea Scrolls represent a stricter view, to the right of the Pharisaic views. Ultimately, in the halakhic debate of the first century ce, the self-understanding of the earliest Christians was very different from that of the sect of the Dead Sea Scrolls.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从死海古卷看福音书中的犹太律法
这项研究考察了《新约》中讨论的犹太法律问题的一些具体例子,《死海古卷》也涉及这些问题。本文对这两种传统的裁决以及法利赛人的观点进行了比较和对比,表明福音书中的犹太法律观点在很大程度上是对法利赛人左边的宽容观点,而死海古卷中的法律观点则代表了对法利赛人右边更严格的观点。最终,在公元前一世纪的哈拉克语辩论中,最早的基督徒的自我理解与死海古卷教派的自我理解非常不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Biblical Theology Bulletin is a distinctive, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal containing articles and reviews written by experts in biblical and theological studies. The editors select articles that provide insights derived from critical biblical scholarship, culture-awareness, and thoughtful reflection on meanings of import for scholars of Bible and religion, religious educators, clergy, and those engaged with social studies in religion, inter-religious studies, and the praxis of biblical religion today. The journal began publication in 1971. It has been distinguished for its early and continuing publication of articles using the social sciences in addition to other critical methods for interpreting the Bible for contemporary readers, teachers, and preachers across cultural and denominational lines.
期刊最新文献
The Ideal Meal: Masculinity and Disability among Host and Guests in Luke Fertility, Slavery, and Biblical Interpretation: John Chrysostom on the Story of Sarah and Hagar Disability as a Symbol of Terror: Rereading the David Narrative in Light of Armed Conflicts in Africa Reading Ancient Temples through the Lens of Disability Studies and Mobility Design Presenting the Issue: Reading Biblical Texts in Conversation with Disability Studies and Health Humanities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1