Nomadic Models of Postmodern Aesthetics: Soteriological Choice of the Teacher

IF 1.6 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of Education Culture and Society Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.15503/jecs2023.1.435.450
L. Kondratska, L. Romanovska, T. Kravchyna, S. Kozachenko, Mykola Novak
{"title":"Nomadic Models of Postmodern Aesthetics: Soteriological Choice of the Teacher","authors":"L. Kondratska, L. Romanovska, T. Kravchyna, S. Kozachenko, Mykola Novak","doi":"10.15503/jecs2023.1.435.450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The aim of the article is to define the concept of aesthetic competence of the nomad teacher of postmodern era based on a comparative analysis of two aesthetic models (metis paraesthetics and soteriological aesthetics).\nMethods. The subject of study is anthropotemporal methodology of acquiring aesthetic competence as an act of spiritual transformation (approaches, paradigm, priorities, criteria of effectiveness). The analysis of the stages of nomad’s dianoic choice in the process of understanding beauty as a boon was carried out using the method of epistemological design, according to which emotions function cognitively in aesthetic experience. The technology of spiritual self-coaching was chosen to activate all the structural components of aesthetic competence – the intention to correct aesthetic apperception and the competencies of emotional-reflective, value-semantic, aesthetic and worldview revaluation.\nResults. The implementation of the chosen technology opened up the possibility of reorientation for the nomad teacher: from the drive of the performer-trickster to a humble and grateful anticipation of the beauty as transcendent – to overcoming the power of inertia of previous dependence, responses to the calls of a pure (still “adventurous”) mind. A cluster analysis of the results of the completed tasks was carried out for the regression description of the efficiency of the technology.\nConclusion. The soteriological concept of the aesthetic competence of the nomad teacher focuses attention on the essential coexistence of the teacher with students throughout the entire process of his self-determination. The practical experience of its implementation can make a positive contribution to reforming postmodern aesthetic education.","PeriodicalId":30646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education Culture and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2023.1.435.450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. The aim of the article is to define the concept of aesthetic competence of the nomad teacher of postmodern era based on a comparative analysis of two aesthetic models (metis paraesthetics and soteriological aesthetics). Methods. The subject of study is anthropotemporal methodology of acquiring aesthetic competence as an act of spiritual transformation (approaches, paradigm, priorities, criteria of effectiveness). The analysis of the stages of nomad’s dianoic choice in the process of understanding beauty as a boon was carried out using the method of epistemological design, according to which emotions function cognitively in aesthetic experience. The technology of spiritual self-coaching was chosen to activate all the structural components of aesthetic competence – the intention to correct aesthetic apperception and the competencies of emotional-reflective, value-semantic, aesthetic and worldview revaluation. Results. The implementation of the chosen technology opened up the possibility of reorientation for the nomad teacher: from the drive of the performer-trickster to a humble and grateful anticipation of the beauty as transcendent – to overcoming the power of inertia of previous dependence, responses to the calls of a pure (still “adventurous”) mind. A cluster analysis of the results of the completed tasks was carried out for the regression description of the efficiency of the technology. Conclusion. The soteriological concept of the aesthetic competence of the nomad teacher focuses attention on the essential coexistence of the teacher with students throughout the entire process of his self-determination. The practical experience of its implementation can make a positive contribution to reforming postmodern aesthetic education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后现代美学的游牧模式:教师的时代选择
的目标。本文旨在通过对两种美学模式(梅提斯的偏美学和救赎论的美学)的比较分析,界定后现代游牧民教师审美能力的概念。研究的主题是作为一种精神转化行为获得审美能力的人类时间方法论(方法,范式,优先事项,有效性标准)。运用认识论设计的方法,分析了游牧民族在把美理解为一种恩惠的过程中,情感在审美体验中的认知作用。选择精神自我辅导技术来激活审美能力的所有结构成分——纠正审美统觉的意图和情感反思能力、价值语义能力、审美能力和世界观重估能力。所选择的技术的实施为游牧民教师的重新定位开辟了可能性:从表演者-骗子的驱动到对超越美的谦卑和感激的期待-克服先前依赖的惯性力量,对纯粹(仍然是“冒险的”)心灵的召唤作出反应。对已完成任务的结果进行聚类分析,对该技术的效率进行回归描述。游牧民教师审美能力的救赎论观关注的是教师与学生在其自我决定的整个过程中的本质共存。其实施的实践经验可以为改革后现代美育做出积极贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education Culture and Society
Journal of Education Culture and Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
75
期刊最新文献
Narrating Chinese Teaching and Learning in Culturally Local Thai Schools The Influence of Ottoman Culture on the Way of life of Albanian Society Motivation and the Psycho-Emotional Reaction of Volunteers in War-Time The Dynamics of Motivation and Social Atmosphere of the Classroom in the Process of Pedagogical Intervention of Reading Comprehension Objective Feedback: The Views of Pedagogical Study Programme Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1