Reconstructing the global human rights order in pursuit of a binding business human rights treaty in the era of decolonisation

Shelton Mota Makore, P. Osode, N. Lubisi
{"title":"Reconstructing the global human rights order in pursuit of a binding\nbusiness human rights treaty in the era of decolonisation","authors":"Shelton Mota Makore, P. Osode, N. Lubisi","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2022/12/1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current global human rights order, eminently propagated in international legal\ninstruments and statements, is to a great extent state-centric in character, bestowing\nobligations on states, whilst largely ignoring the conduct of non-state actors in the form of\ntransnational corporations (TNCs) and trade governance institutions whose record of human\nrights adherence is scarcely convincing. This inability to aptly govern the conduct of\ntransnational entities, even when it is evident that their power now eclipses that of states,\nraises the concern that the extant human rights regime is a neoliberal construct advancing\nmarket fundamentalism and widening the economic disparities between developed and\ndeveloping countries. This article unsettles the doctrinal foundations underlying state\ncentrism in international human rights law, arguing that such a version of human rights is\nexposing developing countries to neoliberal oligarchs, and market deficiencies, which if not\nreformed, may entrench underdevelopment. It calls for a decolonised human rights regime\nwhich impose human rights obligations on the conduct of transnational entities in pursuit of\nhuman dignity, equality and freedom.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2022/12/1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current global human rights order, eminently propagated in international legal instruments and statements, is to a great extent state-centric in character, bestowing obligations on states, whilst largely ignoring the conduct of non-state actors in the form of transnational corporations (TNCs) and trade governance institutions whose record of human rights adherence is scarcely convincing. This inability to aptly govern the conduct of transnational entities, even when it is evident that their power now eclipses that of states, raises the concern that the extant human rights regime is a neoliberal construct advancing market fundamentalism and widening the economic disparities between developed and developing countries. This article unsettles the doctrinal foundations underlying state centrism in international human rights law, arguing that such a version of human rights is exposing developing countries to neoliberal oligarchs, and market deficiencies, which if not reformed, may entrench underdevelopment. It calls for a decolonised human rights regime which impose human rights obligations on the conduct of transnational entities in pursuit of human dignity, equality and freedom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在非殖民化时代,重建全球人权秩序,追求具有约束力的商业人权条约
目前的全球人权秩序在国际法律文书和声明中得到了广泛宣传,在很大程度上是以国家为中心的,赋予国家义务,而在很大程度上将跨国公司和贸易治理机构等非国家行为者的行为忽视,这些非国家行为者遵守人权的记录几乎令人信服。这种无法恰当地管理跨国实体的行为,即使很明显,跨国实体的权力现在盖过了国家的权力,也引发了人们的担忧,即现有的人权制度是一种新自由主义结构,促进了市场原教旨主义,并扩大了发达国家和发展中国家之间的经济差距。这篇文章动摇了国际人权法中国家中心主义的理论基础,认为这种人权形式将发展中国家暴露在新自由主义寡头之下,而市场缺陷如果不加以改革,可能会加剧不发达。它呼吁建立一个非殖民化的人权登记制度,将人权义务强加给跨国实体追求人类尊严、平等和自由的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative judicial procedure Preventing computer crime by knowing the legal regulations that ensure the protection of computer systems A regulatory analysis of digital financial services and the adoption of central bank digital currencies in Zimbabwe and South Africa Forum shopping in regulatory sandboxes and the perils of experimental law-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1