How did Wuhan residents cope with a 76-day lockdown?

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Chinese Sociological Review Pub Date : 2020-09-24 DOI:10.1080/21620555.2020.1820319
Yue Qian, Amy Hanser
{"title":"How did Wuhan residents cope with a 76-day lockdown?","authors":"Yue Qian, Amy Hanser","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2020.1820319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Wuhan, the original epicenter of the COVID-19 outbreak, was under strict lockdown for 76 days. We conducted 30 in-depth interviews to understand Wuhan residents’ lived experiences of lockdown life. We found that despite strong emotions initially, Wuhan residents quickly adapted to life under unprecedented lockdown. We identified three pre-existing structures that facilitated the effective implementation of the massive lockdown: ready-made containment units offered by urban “gated” housing, a comprehensive grassroots governance network coordinated by shequ (community residence committees), and the ubiquitous WeChat app in Chinese daily life. We also showed that the pre-existing structures provided space for uncontentious self-organizing, grassroots mobilization, and civic engagement that often dove-tailed with state-mandated measures. This study details the resources Wuhan residents drew upon to get by during the lockdown, and it illustrates that the feasibility of lockdown measures relies heavily on a society’s structural and institutional conditions.","PeriodicalId":51780,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Sociological Review","volume":"53 1","pages":"55 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21620555.2020.1820319","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2020.1820319","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

Abstract Wuhan, the original epicenter of the COVID-19 outbreak, was under strict lockdown for 76 days. We conducted 30 in-depth interviews to understand Wuhan residents’ lived experiences of lockdown life. We found that despite strong emotions initially, Wuhan residents quickly adapted to life under unprecedented lockdown. We identified three pre-existing structures that facilitated the effective implementation of the massive lockdown: ready-made containment units offered by urban “gated” housing, a comprehensive grassroots governance network coordinated by shequ (community residence committees), and the ubiquitous WeChat app in Chinese daily life. We also showed that the pre-existing structures provided space for uncontentious self-organizing, grassroots mobilization, and civic engagement that often dove-tailed with state-mandated measures. This study details the resources Wuhan residents drew upon to get by during the lockdown, and it illustrates that the feasibility of lockdown measures relies heavily on a society’s structural and institutional conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
武汉居民是如何应对76天的封锁的?
摘要新冠肺炎疫情最初的中心武汉被严格封锁76天 天。我们进行了30次深入采访,了解武汉居民的封锁生活经历。我们发现,尽管最初情绪强烈,武汉居民很快就适应了前所未有的封锁生活。我们确定了三个有助于有效实施大规模封锁的预先存在的结构:城市“封闭式”住房提供的现成遏制单元、由社区居委会协调的基层综合治理网络,以及中国日常生活中无处不在的微信应用程序。我们还表明,预先存在的结构为无争议的自组织、基层动员和公民参与提供了空间,而公民参与往往落后于国家授权的措施。这项研究详细介绍了武汉居民在封锁期间赖以生存的资源,并表明封锁措施的可行性在很大程度上取决于社会的结构和制度条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Intra-clan marriage in modern times: the role of elite education in assortative mating Bullying victimization and its life-course shadows: evidence from China The double burden of malnutrition among young Chinese children: a hierarchical structure of socioeconomic inequality indicators Who cares? Childcare support and women’s labor supply in Hong Kong Defending the hospital or supporting the complainant: morality in medical disputes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1