Drought Management Plans of Major Cities in Alabama v. California

IF 0.6 Q3 GEOGRAPHY Southeastern Geographer Pub Date : 2021-02-19 DOI:10.1353/sgo.2021.0003
M. Moore, Philip L. Chaney, E. Brantley, C. Burton
{"title":"Drought Management Plans of Major Cities in Alabama v. California","authors":"M. Moore, Philip L. Chaney, E. Brantley, C. Burton","doi":"10.1353/sgo.2021.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Water security in urban areas is at risk in many regions of the world, including the Southeastern US. To compound matters, these issues are magnified during drought. Without adequate management and planning, drought impacts are likely to become more severe. This study focused on drought management plans of major cities in Alabama. However, it is important to understand how Alabama’s approach compares with other regions, particularly those with greater experience with drought. For this task we chose California. We selected the seven most populated cities in Alabama and seven cities of comparable population in California for the study. We then evaluated their drought plans based on the overall scope of the plan, three key elements of sustainable policy (social, environmental, and economic), and three stages of drought management (pre-, during-, and post-drought). Alabama and California plans received similar scores for the overall scope and the during-drought period. However, Alabama plans completely neglected the pre-drought period, were less comprehensive in all other areas, substantially weaker in detail, and lacking in enforcement and penalties. Furthermore, most Alabama plans were not available online to the public; whereas all California plans were available online and included public participation in the design process.","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"61 1","pages":"31 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/sgo.2021.0003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Geographer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2021.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

abstract:Water security in urban areas is at risk in many regions of the world, including the Southeastern US. To compound matters, these issues are magnified during drought. Without adequate management and planning, drought impacts are likely to become more severe. This study focused on drought management plans of major cities in Alabama. However, it is important to understand how Alabama’s approach compares with other regions, particularly those with greater experience with drought. For this task we chose California. We selected the seven most populated cities in Alabama and seven cities of comparable population in California for the study. We then evaluated their drought plans based on the overall scope of the plan, three key elements of sustainable policy (social, environmental, and economic), and three stages of drought management (pre-, during-, and post-drought). Alabama and California plans received similar scores for the overall scope and the during-drought period. However, Alabama plans completely neglected the pre-drought period, were less comprehensive in all other areas, substantially weaker in detail, and lacking in enforcement and penalties. Furthermore, most Alabama plans were not available online to the public; whereas all California plans were available online and included public participation in the design process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉巴马州诉加利福尼亚州主要城市的干旱管理计划
摘要:在包括美国东南部在内的世界许多地区,城市地区的水安全面临风险。更为复杂的是,这些问题在干旱期间被放大了。如果没有充分的管理和规划,干旱的影响可能会变得更加严重。这项研究的重点是阿拉巴马州主要城市的干旱管理计划。然而,重要的是要了解阿拉巴马州的做法与其他地区相比如何,特别是那些在干旱方面经验丰富的地区。为了完成这项任务,我们选择了加利福尼亚州。我们选择了阿拉巴马州人口最多的七个城市和加利福尼亚州人口可比的七个城镇进行研究。然后,我们根据计划的总体范围、可持续政策的三个关键要素(社会、环境和经济)以及干旱管理的三个阶段(干旱前、干旱中和干旱后)评估了他们的干旱计划。阿拉巴马州和加利福尼亚州的计划在总体范围和干旱期间的得分相似。然而,阿拉巴马州的计划完全忽视了干旱前的时期,在所有其他领域都不那么全面,细节也明显薄弱,缺乏执行和惩罚。此外,阿拉巴马州的大多数计划都无法在网上向公众提供;而加州的所有计划都可以在网上获得,并包括公众参与设计过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Southeastern Geographer is a biannual publication of the Southeastern Division of Association of American Geographers. The journal has published the academic work of geographers and other social and physical scientists since 1961. Peer-reviewed articles and essays are published along with book reviews, organization and conference reports, and commentaries. The journal welcomes manuscripts on any geographical subject as long as it reflects sound scholarship and contains significant contributions to geographical understanding.
期刊最新文献
Latino Orlando: Suburban Transformation and Racial Conflict by Simone Delerme (review) Unraveling the Nature of Southeastern Lianas Post-Pandemic Urban Form: Tentative Signs of Office Recentralization in Charlotte Immigrants and Inequality: Evidence from a Minor-Emerging Gateway Metropolitan Area in NC Gauging Geography's Vitality through National and Regional Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1