Knight's Moves: The Son-in-law in Cicero and Tacitus

IF 0.9 2区 历史学 0 CLASSICS CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI:10.1525/CA.2019.38.1.2
Emily Gowers
{"title":"Knight's Moves: The Son-in-law in Cicero and Tacitus","authors":"Emily Gowers","doi":"10.1525/CA.2019.38.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the relationship between fathers and sons, real or metaphorical, is still a dominant paradigm among classicists, this paper considers the rival contribution of Roman sons-in-law to the processes of collaboration and succession. It discusses the tensions, constraints, and obligations that soceri–generi relationships involved, then claims a significant role for sons-in-law in literary production. A new category is proposed here: “son-in-law literature,” with texts offered as recompense for a wife or her dowry, or as substitute funeral orations. Cicero and Tacitus are two authors for whom the relationship played a key role in shaping realities and fantasies of advancement. The idealized in-law bonds of De Amicitia, Brutus, and De Oratore are set against Cicero's intellectual aspirations and real-life dealings with a challenging son-in-law, while Tacitus' relationship to Agricola can be seen to affect both his historiographical discussions of father–son-in-law relationships and the lessons he drew from them about imperial succession.","PeriodicalId":45164,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/CA.2019.38.1.2","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/CA.2019.38.1.2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While the relationship between fathers and sons, real or metaphorical, is still a dominant paradigm among classicists, this paper considers the rival contribution of Roman sons-in-law to the processes of collaboration and succession. It discusses the tensions, constraints, and obligations that soceri–generi relationships involved, then claims a significant role for sons-in-law in literary production. A new category is proposed here: “son-in-law literature,” with texts offered as recompense for a wife or her dowry, or as substitute funeral orations. Cicero and Tacitus are two authors for whom the relationship played a key role in shaping realities and fantasies of advancement. The idealized in-law bonds of De Amicitia, Brutus, and De Oratore are set against Cicero's intellectual aspirations and real-life dealings with a challenging son-in-law, while Tacitus' relationship to Agricola can be seen to affect both his historiographical discussions of father–son-in-law relationships and the lessons he drew from them about imperial succession.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骑士的行动:西塞罗和塔西陀的女婿
尽管父亲和儿子之间的关系,无论是真实的还是隐喻的,仍然是古典主义者的主导范式,但本文考虑了罗马女婿对合作和继承过程的竞争性贡献。它讨论了社会一般关系所涉及的紧张,约束和义务,然后声称女婿在文学创作中的重要作用。这里提出了一个新的类别:“女婿文学”,即作为对妻子或她的嫁妆的补偿,或作为替代的葬礼演讲的文本。对西塞罗和塔西佗这两位作家来说,这种关系在塑造现实和进步的幻想方面发挥了关键作用。德·阿米西亚、布鲁图斯和德·奥拉托雷的理想姻亲关系与西塞罗的智力抱负和现实生活中与一个具有挑战性的女婿的交往相抵触,而塔西佗与阿格里科拉的关系可以被视为影响了他对父子关系的历史讨论,以及他从中吸取的关于帝国继承的教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Heraclean Overhaul(s): Par-a-noia, Badiou’s Un-thought, and Neurodiversity in H of H* ANNE CARSON’S EURIPIDES Slanted Translation[s]: An Interview with Artist Rosanna Bruno H of H and the Combustion of Thought Repeating after Carson
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1