Children’s Perspectives of an Enhanced Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Child–Parent Dyads With Anxiety Disorders

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive and Behavioral Practice Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.02.023
Chloe Andrea Salvaris, Catherine Wade, Samantha Galea, Marie Bee Hui Yap, Katherine A. Lawrence
{"title":"Children’s Perspectives of an Enhanced Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Child–Parent Dyads With Anxiety Disorders","authors":"Chloe Andrea Salvaris,&nbsp;Catherine Wade,&nbsp;Samantha Galea,&nbsp;Marie Bee Hui Yap,&nbsp;Katherine A. Lawrence","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.02.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prior research has extensively evaluated the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for child anxiety disorders—however, few studies have investigated anxious children’s perspectives and experiences of participating in CBT. This qualitative study explored children’s acceptability of a newly developed enhanced CBT intervention, designed specifically for the treatment of anxiety disorders in children with a clinically anxious parent. The study also explored children’s perceptions and experiences of individual (child only) and joint observational (child–parent) exposure activities that were key to the intervention. Ten children (age range 6–11, <em>M</em> = 8.5 years) and their mothers (age range 34–45, <em>M</em> = 39.5 years) completed in-depth semistructured interviews to investigate child participants’ anticipated and experiential acceptability of the enhanced CBT intervention. Thematic analysis revealed seven major themes broadly reflecting the acceptability, appropriateness, and perceived benefit of the intervention elements, with particular value credited to exposure tasks and the dyadic nature of the intervention. Findings suggest that future experimental evaluation of the enhanced intervention is warranted. Further, the study highlights that CBT for child anxiety disorders, where exposure work is a feature, is acceptable and perceived to be effective by its intended treatment recipients. Trial prospectively registered, preresults, ANZCTR1261900033410.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51511,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077722922000724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research has extensively evaluated the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for child anxiety disorders—however, few studies have investigated anxious children’s perspectives and experiences of participating in CBT. This qualitative study explored children’s acceptability of a newly developed enhanced CBT intervention, designed specifically for the treatment of anxiety disorders in children with a clinically anxious parent. The study also explored children’s perceptions and experiences of individual (child only) and joint observational (child–parent) exposure activities that were key to the intervention. Ten children (age range 6–11, M = 8.5 years) and their mothers (age range 34–45, M = 39.5 years) completed in-depth semistructured interviews to investigate child participants’ anticipated and experiential acceptability of the enhanced CBT intervention. Thematic analysis revealed seven major themes broadly reflecting the acceptability, appropriateness, and perceived benefit of the intervention elements, with particular value credited to exposure tasks and the dyadic nature of the intervention. Findings suggest that future experimental evaluation of the enhanced intervention is warranted. Further, the study highlights that CBT for child anxiety disorders, where exposure work is a feature, is acceptable and perceived to be effective by its intended treatment recipients. Trial prospectively registered, preresults, ANZCTR1261900033410.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童对儿童-父母双性焦虑症的强化认知行为治疗的看法
先前的研究已经广泛地评估了认知行为疗法(CBT)对儿童焦虑症的疗效,然而,很少有研究调查了焦虑儿童参与CBT的观点和经历。本定性研究探讨了儿童对新开发的增强型CBT干预的接受程度,该干预专为治疗患有临床焦虑父母的儿童的焦虑症而设计。该研究还探讨了儿童对个体(仅儿童)和联合观察(儿童-父母)接触活动的感知和体验,这些活动是干预的关键。10名儿童(年龄范围6-11岁,M = 8.5岁)及其母亲(年龄范围34-45岁,M = 39.5岁)完成了深度半结构化访谈,以调查儿童参与者对增强CBT干预的预期和经验可接受性。专题分析揭示了七个主要主题,广泛反映了干预要素的可接受性、适当性和感知效益,特别重视暴露任务和干预的二元性。研究结果表明,未来有必要对强化干预进行实验评估。此外,该研究强调了儿童焦虑症的CBT治疗,其中暴露工作是一个特征,是可接受的,并且被预期的治疗接受者认为是有效的。试验前瞻性注册,预结果,ANZCTR1261900033410。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Cognitive and Behavioral Practice is a quarterly international journal that serves an enduring resource for empirically informed methods of clinical practice. Its mission is to bridge the gap between published research and the actual clinical practice of cognitive behavior therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice publishes clinically rich accounts of innovative assessment and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that are clearly grounded in empirical research. A focus on application and implementation of procedures is maintained.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mapping Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills to Clinical Domains Implicated in Contemporary Addiction Research: A Conceptual Synthesis and Promise for Precision Medicine TEAM-CBT for Adolescents and Young Adults With Depression and Anxiety: Testing Short-Term Impact and Within-Session Change Narrative Exposure Therapy for a Traumatic Birth Experience With the Non-Birthing Parent: A Single Case Study Disorders in Disguise: Proposed Clinical Competencies in Eating Disorders for All Child and Adolescent Mental Health Providers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1