Nominal Agreement Class Assignment in Tikuna (Isolate, Western Amazonia): a Dynamic Process Conditioned by Both Lexicon and Context

Denis Bertet
{"title":"Nominal Agreement Class Assignment in Tikuna (Isolate, Western Amazonia): a Dynamic Process Conditioned by Both Lexicon and Context","authors":"Denis Bertet","doi":"10.1163/19589514-05202009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Tikuna (isolate, western Amazonia) features a system of five nominal agreement classes: Feminine, Masculine, Neuter, Salientive, and Non-Salientive. Like in well-known Indo-European gender languages, the targets of class agreement (nominal modifiers and pronominal morphemes, essentially) obligatorily agree in class with the participant they relate to. Tikuna, however, usually offers several options of class assignment to given participants in discourse, and even allows participants to change class over the course of a single discourse performance. A participant designated by means of the noun kŏwǘ ‘deer’ may thus be assigned to any class except Neuter, suggesting that lexical properties of nouns cannot fully account for class assignment. I argue that the primary factor underlying class assignment (and reassignment) in Tikuna are the inherent semantic and pragmatic values of each class. Lexical properties and, occasionally, the class assignment of other participants in the immediate context, do come into play, but as secondary factors. Flexibility and secondary reliance on lexical information are the most visibly divergent characteristics of class assignment in Tikuna relative to typical Indo-European gender systems.","PeriodicalId":90499,"journal":{"name":"Faits de langues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faits de langues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-05202009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tikuna (isolate, western Amazonia) features a system of five nominal agreement classes: Feminine, Masculine, Neuter, Salientive, and Non-Salientive. Like in well-known Indo-European gender languages, the targets of class agreement (nominal modifiers and pronominal morphemes, essentially) obligatorily agree in class with the participant they relate to. Tikuna, however, usually offers several options of class assignment to given participants in discourse, and even allows participants to change class over the course of a single discourse performance. A participant designated by means of the noun kŏwǘ ‘deer’ may thus be assigned to any class except Neuter, suggesting that lexical properties of nouns cannot fully account for class assignment. I argue that the primary factor underlying class assignment (and reassignment) in Tikuna are the inherent semantic and pragmatic values of each class. Lexical properties and, occasionally, the class assignment of other participants in the immediate context, do come into play, but as secondary factors. Flexibility and secondary reliance on lexical information are the most visibly divergent characteristics of class assignment in Tikuna relative to typical Indo-European gender systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蒂库纳语(西亚马逊孤立语)的名义协议类分配:一个由词汇和语境共同制约的动态过程
Tikuna(孤立的,亚马逊西部)以五个名义协议类别的系统为特色:阴性,阳性,中性,显著性和非显著性。就像在著名的印欧性别语言中一样,类一致的目标(名义修饰语和代词语素,本质上)在类中必须与他们所涉及的参与者一致。然而,Tikuna通常为给定的参与者提供几个课堂作业选择,甚至允许参与者在一次演讲表演的过程中改变课程。因此,通过名词kŏwǘ ' deer '指定的参与者可以被分配到除中性外的任何类别,这表明名词的词汇属性不能完全解释类别分配。我认为Tikuna中类分配(和重新分配)的主要因素是每个类的固有语义和语用价值。词汇特性,偶尔,其他参与者在直接上下文中的班级分配,确实起作用,但作为次要因素。相对于典型的印欧性别系统,蒂库纳语班级分配的灵活性和对词汇信息的二次依赖是最明显的差异特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Système numéral et neutralisation du genre numéral en soureth Vocative strategies and accent in Armenian: synchrony and diachrony Approche sémantique et contrastive des connecteurs français en fait et italien infatti : la proximité morphologique révèle-t-elle une proximité sémantique? Il n’y a pas à dire, un marqueur discursif du refus de contestation « Etes-vous la victime d’un “isme”? »: emploi nominal et référentiel du suffixe –isme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1