A novel consensus reaching method for the preference-approval structure based on regret theory and its application in evaluating pension institutions

IF 2.2 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1108/ijicc-02-2023-0023
Qinggang Shi, Peng Li, Zhi-Wei-Lin Xu
{"title":"A novel consensus reaching method for the preference-approval structure based on regret theory and its application in evaluating pension institutions","authors":"Qinggang Shi, Peng Li, Zhi-Wei-Lin Xu","doi":"10.1108/ijicc-02-2023-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose a consensus method for multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems based on preference-approval structure and regret theory, which can improve the efficiency of decision-making and promote the consensus level among individuals.Design/methodology/approachFirst, a new method to obtain the reference points based on regret theory and expert weighting method is proposed. Second, a consensus reaching method based on preference-approval structure is proposed. Then, an adjustment mechanism to further improve the consensus level between individuals is designed. Finally, an example of the assessment of elderly care institutions is used to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.FindingsThe feasibility and validity of the proposed method are verified by comparing with the advanced two-stage minimum adjustment method. The compared results show that the proposed method is more consistent with the actual situation.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper presents a consensus reaching method for MAGDM based on preference-approval structure, which considers the avoidance behaviors of individuals and reference points. Decision makers (DMs) can use this approach to rank and categorize alternatives while further increasing the level of consensus among them. This can further help determine the optimal alternative more efficiently.Originality/valueA new MAGDM problem based on the combination of regret theory and individual reference points is proposed. Besides, a new method of obtaining experts' weights and a consensus reaching method for MAGDM based on preference-approval structure are designed.","PeriodicalId":45291,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijicc-02-2023-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose a consensus method for multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems based on preference-approval structure and regret theory, which can improve the efficiency of decision-making and promote the consensus level among individuals.Design/methodology/approachFirst, a new method to obtain the reference points based on regret theory and expert weighting method is proposed. Second, a consensus reaching method based on preference-approval structure is proposed. Then, an adjustment mechanism to further improve the consensus level between individuals is designed. Finally, an example of the assessment of elderly care institutions is used to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.FindingsThe feasibility and validity of the proposed method are verified by comparing with the advanced two-stage minimum adjustment method. The compared results show that the proposed method is more consistent with the actual situation.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper presents a consensus reaching method for MAGDM based on preference-approval structure, which considers the avoidance behaviors of individuals and reference points. Decision makers (DMs) can use this approach to rank and categorize alternatives while further increasing the level of consensus among them. This can further help determine the optimal alternative more efficiently.Originality/valueA new MAGDM problem based on the combination of regret theory and individual reference points is proposed. Besides, a new method of obtaining experts' weights and a consensus reaching method for MAGDM based on preference-approval structure are designed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种基于后悔理论的偏好核准结构共识达成方法及其在养老机构评估中的应用
目的提出一种基于偏好-赞同结构和后悔理论的多属性群体决策(MAGDM)问题的一致性方法,以提高决策效率,提高个体间的一致性水平。设计/方法论/方法首先,提出了一种基于后悔理论和专家加权法的参考点获取新方法。其次,提出了一种基于偏好核准结构的共识达成方法。然后,设计了一种调整机制,以进一步提高个体之间的共识水平。最后,以养老机构评估为例说明了该方法的可行性和有效性。通过与先进的两阶段最小平差法的比较,验证了该方法的可行性和有效性。对比结果表明,该方法更符合实际情况。研究局限性/含义本文提出了一种基于偏好-批准结构的MAGDM共识达成方法,该方法考虑了个体和参考点的回避行为。决策者(DM)可以使用这种方法对备选方案进行排名和分类,同时进一步提高他们之间的共识水平。这可以进一步帮助更有效地确定最佳替代方案。独创性/价值基于后悔理论和个体参考点的结合,提出了一个新的MAGDM问题。此外,还设计了一种新的专家权重获取方法和一种基于偏好核准结构的MAGDM共识达成方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Six classes named entity recognition for mapping location of Indonesia natural disasters from twitter data Evaluation of predicted fault tolerance based on C5.0 decision tree algorithm in irrigation system of paddy fields Manifold embedded global and local discriminative features selection for single-shot multi-categories clothing recognition and retrieval Exploring the differentiated elderly service subsidies considering consumer word-of-mouth preferences TaskMatrix.AI: Completing Tasks by Connecting Foundation Models with Millions of APIs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1