{"title":"Discourse, Antagonisms, and Identities during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"A. Anisin","doi":"10.4000/rccs.13434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study utilizes theory from the Essex School of Ideology and Discourse Analysis (IDA) and investigates speeches and statements made by high-ranking European Union officials from the European Commission as well as policy documents. The inquiry reveals that antagonistic language was used to justify the tracking and tracing of civilians through the articulation of an empty “track and trace” signifier and the articulation of new identities premised on the vaccinated and non-vaccinated. Policy makers articulated new ideas surrounding a regime of truth and a common “people” while simultaneously negating opponents to pandemic policies by articulating floating signifiers, including xenophobia, disinformation, and populism. The exercise of power in health policies during the pandemic functioned according to logics similar to those employed in traditional political domains. © 2022 Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":54161,"journal":{"name":"Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.13434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COVID-19大流行期间的话语、对抗和身份认同
本研究运用了埃塞克斯意识形态与话语分析学院(IDA)的理论,并调查了欧盟委员会高级欧盟官员的演讲和声明以及政策文件。调查显示,敌对的语言被用来为跟踪和追踪平民辩护,通过表达空洞的“跟踪和追踪”能指,并以接种疫苗和未接种疫苗者为前提,表达新的身份。政策制定者阐述了围绕真理政权和共同“人民”的新思想,同时通过阐明仇外心理、虚假信息和民粹主义等浮动符号,否定了流行病政策的反对者。大流行期间卫生政策权力的行使按照与传统政治领域类似的逻辑运作。©2022科英布拉大学社会研究中心。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。