Rage against the machine: investigating conspiracy theories about the video assistant referee on Twitter during the 2018 FIFA World Cup

IF 3.7 1区 教育学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Sport Management Review Pub Date : 2022-11-28 DOI:10.1080/14413523.2022.2127179
P. Bertin, S. Delouvée, Kathleen McColl, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen
{"title":"Rage against the machine: investigating conspiracy theories about the video assistant referee on Twitter during the 2018 FIFA World Cup","authors":"P. Bertin, S. Delouvée, Kathleen McColl, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen","doi":"10.1080/14413523.2022.2127179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Conspiracy theories arise during important societal and political events, with negative consequences. Yet, conspiracy theories remain to be investigated in the context of sporting tournaments, in spite of the importance of such events in contemporary societies. During the 2018 FIFA World Cup, conspiracy theories alleging that the newly introduced video Assistant Referee (VAR) was used with malevolent motives gained popularity online. In this paper, we used a Twitter content analysis to explore VAR conspiracy theories during the World Cup (N = 2,768 tweets). Conspiracy tweets peaked after eliminations of some teams and were strongly associated with labels referring to self-categorization at the group-level, supporting the notion that conspiracy beliefs are triggered by contexts threatening one’s social identity. Conspiracy tweets were also correlated with tweets expressing skepticism or defiance against the VAR, suggesting that conspiracy beliefs might be related to sport fans’ other identity management strategies. Finally, we drew an intergroup typology of VAR conspiracy beliefs’ recurrent figures, highlighting that higher ordered categorization helped conspiracy narratives and content to adapt throughout the tournament. We discuss the identity management strategy status of sport fans’ conspiracy beliefs. HIGHLIGHTS Tweets accusing the Video Assistant Referee to be a conspiracy peaked as some teams were eliminated from the 2018 FIFA World Cup. A small proportion of group-stage matches generated most of the conspiracy tweets, notably those leading to African teams’ eliminations. Conspiracy tweets were characterized by group-level labels, suggesting conspiracy beliefs were expressed as identity management strategies. Conspiracy narratives evolved through the tournament following a higher ordered categorization process to include more eliminated teams.","PeriodicalId":48057,"journal":{"name":"Sport Management Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"495 - 516"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2022.2127179","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Conspiracy theories arise during important societal and political events, with negative consequences. Yet, conspiracy theories remain to be investigated in the context of sporting tournaments, in spite of the importance of such events in contemporary societies. During the 2018 FIFA World Cup, conspiracy theories alleging that the newly introduced video Assistant Referee (VAR) was used with malevolent motives gained popularity online. In this paper, we used a Twitter content analysis to explore VAR conspiracy theories during the World Cup (N = 2,768 tweets). Conspiracy tweets peaked after eliminations of some teams and were strongly associated with labels referring to self-categorization at the group-level, supporting the notion that conspiracy beliefs are triggered by contexts threatening one’s social identity. Conspiracy tweets were also correlated with tweets expressing skepticism or defiance against the VAR, suggesting that conspiracy beliefs might be related to sport fans’ other identity management strategies. Finally, we drew an intergroup typology of VAR conspiracy beliefs’ recurrent figures, highlighting that higher ordered categorization helped conspiracy narratives and content to adapt throughout the tournament. We discuss the identity management strategy status of sport fans’ conspiracy beliefs. HIGHLIGHTS Tweets accusing the Video Assistant Referee to be a conspiracy peaked as some teams were eliminated from the 2018 FIFA World Cup. A small proportion of group-stage matches generated most of the conspiracy tweets, notably those leading to African teams’ eliminations. Conspiracy tweets were characterized by group-level labels, suggesting conspiracy beliefs were expressed as identity management strategies. Conspiracy narratives evolved through the tournament following a higher ordered categorization process to include more eliminated teams.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对机器的愤怒:调查2018年世界杯期间Twitter上关于视频助理裁判的阴谋论
阴谋论产生于重要的社会和政治事件中,并产生负面后果。然而,尽管体育比赛在当代社会中很重要,但阴谋论仍有待于在体育比赛的背景下进行调查。在2018年国际足联世界杯期间,声称新引入的视频助理裁判(VAR)被恶意使用的阴谋论在网上广受欢迎。在本文中,我们使用推特内容分析来探索世界杯期间的VAR阴谋论(N=2768条推文)。阴谋推文在一些团队被淘汰后达到顶峰,并与团体层面的自我分类标签密切相关,支持阴谋信念是由威胁个人社会身份的背景引发的这一观点。阴谋推文也与表达对VAR的怀疑或蔑视的推文相关,这表明阴谋信念可能与体育迷的其他身份管理策略有关。最后,我们绘制了VAR阴谋信念的重复数字的组间类型学,强调更高顺序的分类有助于阴谋叙事和内容在整个锦标赛中适应。我们讨论了体育迷阴谋信念的身份管理策略现状。当一些球队被2018年国际足联世界杯淘汰时,指责视频助理裁判是阴谋的推特达到了顶峰。一小部分小组赛引发了大多数阴谋推特,尤其是那些导致非洲球队被淘汰的推特。阴谋推文以群体级别的标签为特征,表明阴谋信念被表达为身份管理策略。阴谋论在锦标赛中不断演变,遵循更高顺序的分类过程,包括更多被淘汰的球队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Sport Management Review is published as a service to sport industries worldwide. It is a multidisciplinary journal concerned with the management, marketing, and governance of sport at all levels and in all its manifestations -- whether as an entertainment, a recreation, or an occupation. The journal encourages collaboration between scholars and practitioners. It welcomes submissions reporting research, new applications, advances in theory, and case studies. The language of publication is English. Submissions are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Pollination, cultivation, and perennialization: creating the amateur logic in collegiate sport Public perception of esports: an examination of esports image and genre differences Leadership development: relationality and temporality in professional sport Musical congruity in sports: enhancing team branding in esports and traditional sports Market demand for metaverse-based sporting events: a mixed-methods approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1