The House That Deconstruction Built: Can Post-Structuralism Inform A Liberatory Social Work Praxis?

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/08861099231173081
Giacinta Talarico
{"title":"The House That Deconstruction Built: Can Post-Structuralism Inform A Liberatory Social Work Praxis?","authors":"Giacinta Talarico","doi":"10.1177/08861099231173081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social work praxis has long been in conversation with feminist praxis and has more recently been informed by an anticolonial feminist praxis that aims to center theorizing, activism, and service delivery around individuals and communities considered “most marginalized.” While this “most marginalized” class may be deemed newly worthy social service consumers this framing reinforces extant settler colonial hierarchies of power and oppression by constituting new classes of “deserving” and “undeserving” social service recipients. This article explores how the feminist organizing, scholarship, and activism of the past decade—specifically around the #MeToo movement and trans-exclusionary radical feminism (TERF) wars—have impacted social work praxis and laid bare the dualistic binds of a post-structuralism that has been consumed and recast within neoliberalism as demobilized identity politics. By examining these limitations, questions are raised regarding next steps for a social work praxis concerned with justice, transformation, and liberation.","PeriodicalId":47277,"journal":{"name":"Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099231173081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social work praxis has long been in conversation with feminist praxis and has more recently been informed by an anticolonial feminist praxis that aims to center theorizing, activism, and service delivery around individuals and communities considered “most marginalized.” While this “most marginalized” class may be deemed newly worthy social service consumers this framing reinforces extant settler colonial hierarchies of power and oppression by constituting new classes of “deserving” and “undeserving” social service recipients. This article explores how the feminist organizing, scholarship, and activism of the past decade—specifically around the #MeToo movement and trans-exclusionary radical feminism (TERF) wars—have impacted social work praxis and laid bare the dualistic binds of a post-structuralism that has been consumed and recast within neoliberalism as demobilized identity politics. By examining these limitations, questions are raised regarding next steps for a social work praxis concerned with justice, transformation, and liberation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解构主义建造的房子:后结构主义能否为解放的社会工作实践提供启示?
社会工作实践长期以来一直与女权主义实践进行对话,最近又受到反殖民主义女权主义实践的影响,该实践旨在将理论化、行动主义和服务提供集中在被认为是“最边缘化”的个人和社区周围。虽然这个“最边缘化”的阶级可能被认为是新的有价值的社会服务消费者,但这种框架通过构成“值得”和“不值得”社会服务接受者的新阶级,加强了现存的定居者殖民权力和压迫等级。本文探讨了女权主义组织、学术研究和过去十年的行动主义——特别是围绕#MeToo运动和跨性别排他的激进女权主义(TERF)战争——是如何影响社会工作实践的,并揭示了后结构主义的二元束缚,这种二元束缚在新自由主义中被消费和重塑为复体的身份政治。通过检查这些限制,提出了关于社会工作实践中涉及正义、转型和解放的下一步的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work is dedicated to the discussion and development of feminist values, theories, and knowledge as they relate to social work and social welfare research, education, and practice. The intent of Affilia is to bring insight and knowledge to the task of eliminating discrimination and oppression, especially with respect to gender, race, ethnicity, class, age, disability, and sexual and affectional preference.
期刊最新文献
Who Do We Call “Creepy?”: Sex Workers’ Relationships as Targets of Intimate Intervention Social Work in a Post-Dobbs World: The ‘Adoption Fallacy’, Decolonization, and Reproductive Justice Book Review: Working it: Sex workers on the work of sex by Bickers, M., Breshears, P., & Luna, J. The Imposition of a Coerced Autonomy: Suicidal “Bad Girls,” Human Service Professionals, and Gender Bias Book Review: Integrative social work practice with refugees, asylum seekers, and other forcibly displaced persons by Murakami, N. J. & Akilova, M.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1