Why Olympiad: Investigating Motivations and Benefits of Coaching Elementary Science Olympiad

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Science Teacher Education Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1080/1046560X.2021.2024690
Kylie J. Swanson, Jason Painter, Margaret R. Blanchard, Kimberly D. Gervase
{"title":"Why Olympiad: Investigating Motivations and Benefits of Coaching Elementary Science Olympiad","authors":"Kylie J. Swanson, Jason Painter, Margaret R. Blanchard, Kimberly D. Gervase","doi":"10.1080/1046560X.2021.2024690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Science Olympiad is a K-12 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) competition that engages approximately 7,000 teams across the U.S. in individual and team challenges at regional, state, and national levels. Science Olympiad began expanding to include elementary students in 2008. Yet, little is known about the adults who volunteer to coach elementary Science Olympiad teams or their coaching motivations. The purpose of this study was to investigate who coached elementary Science Olympiad teams, what motivated them to volunteer, and how their participation influenced their science teaching self-confidence, knowledge, and practices. This mixed-methods study investigated 125 Elementary Science Olympiad coaches’ beliefs in the southeastern U.S. Survey items were based on the Coach Motivation Questionnaire (CMQ). Open-response questions following the survey items were coded in two ways; inductively and based on a priori motivational codes. Participant coaches were most likely to be teachers (92%), female (85%), and White (85%). Survey findings indicate that coaches’ most significant motivating factors were intrinsic (M = 4.33/5); minor differences were based on gender, role, and length of time coaching. The qualitative responses supported the survey findings and gave more insight into teacher-coaches’ thinking. The coaching experience had many positive effects on the teachers, such as enhancing their science and pedagogical content knowledge in science and other subjects, strongly influencing their self-confidence, and increasing their use of hands-on science and STEM activities.","PeriodicalId":47326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"63 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2024690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Science Olympiad is a K-12 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) competition that engages approximately 7,000 teams across the U.S. in individual and team challenges at regional, state, and national levels. Science Olympiad began expanding to include elementary students in 2008. Yet, little is known about the adults who volunteer to coach elementary Science Olympiad teams or their coaching motivations. The purpose of this study was to investigate who coached elementary Science Olympiad teams, what motivated them to volunteer, and how their participation influenced their science teaching self-confidence, knowledge, and practices. This mixed-methods study investigated 125 Elementary Science Olympiad coaches’ beliefs in the southeastern U.S. Survey items were based on the Coach Motivation Questionnaire (CMQ). Open-response questions following the survey items were coded in two ways; inductively and based on a priori motivational codes. Participant coaches were most likely to be teachers (92%), female (85%), and White (85%). Survey findings indicate that coaches’ most significant motivating factors were intrinsic (M = 4.33/5); minor differences were based on gender, role, and length of time coaching. The qualitative responses supported the survey findings and gave more insight into teacher-coaches’ thinking. The coaching experience had many positive effects on the teachers, such as enhancing their science and pedagogical content knowledge in science and other subjects, strongly influencing their self-confidence, and increasing their use of hands-on science and STEM activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么参加奥林匹克运动会:探究指导基础科学奥林匹克运动会的动机和好处
摘要:科学奥林匹克是一项K-12科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)竞赛,在美国各地约有7000支队伍参加地区、州和国家层面的个人和团队挑战。2008年,科学奥林匹克竞赛开始扩大到包括小学生在内。然而,人们对那些自愿执教基础科学奥林匹克队的成年人及其执教动机知之甚少。本研究的目的是调查谁指导了初级科学奥林匹克团队,是什么激励他们做志愿者,以及他们的参与如何影响他们的科学教学自信、知识和实践。这项混合方法研究调查了美国东南部125名基础科学奥林匹克教练的信念。调查项目基于教练动机问卷(CMQ)。调查项目之后的开放式回答问题以两种方式编码;归纳并基于先验动机代码。参与者教练最有可能是教师(92%)、女性(85%)和白人(85%)。调查结果表明,教练员最显著的激励因素是内在的(M=4.33/5);细微的差异是基于性别、角色和执教时间的长短。定性回答支持了调查结果,并对教师教练的想法有了更多的了解。辅导经验对教师产生了许多积极影响,例如提高了他们在科学和其他科目中的科学和教学内容知识,强烈影响了他们的自信心,并增加了他们对实践科学和STEM活动的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Science Teacher Education
Journal of Science Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Journal of Science Teacher Education (JSTE) is the flagship journal of the Association for Science Teacher Education. It serves as a forum for disseminating high quality research and theoretical position papers concerning preservice and inservice education of science teachers. The Journal features pragmatic articles that offer ways to improve classroom teaching and learning, professional development, and teacher recruitment and retention at pre K-16 levels.
期刊最新文献
Where’s the Peanut Butter? Journaling about Science Practices in Everyday Life Integrating Text Structure Instruction in Science Education: A Design-Based Study What Makes this Lesson Engineering? What Makes it Science? Examining the Thought Processes of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Science Teacher Action Research in Top Tier Science Education Journals: A Review of the Literature Integrated Language and Science & Technology Instruction: A Cognitive Task Analysis of the Required Teacher Expertise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1