Comparative study of two reprocessing methods for formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue

Pub Date : 2022-04-13 DOI:10.1080/01478885.2022.2062532
Matthew D Lunetta, Megan Grivois, Christopher Hansen, Peter Seery, Cameron C Felty, Elizabeth Rizzo, Christopher R. Jackson
{"title":"Comparative study of two reprocessing methods for formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue","authors":"Matthew D Lunetta, Megan Grivois, Christopher Hansen, Peter Seery, Cameron C Felty, Elizabeth Rizzo, Christopher R. Jackson","doi":"10.1080/01478885.2022.2062532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue occasionally requires reprocessing if the histologic quality of a section is inadequate for clinical diagnosis. The Pat Dry (PD) and the Serial Xylene (SX) methods are two techniques described in the literature to reprocess under-fixed and/or under-processed tissue samples. To date, no study has compared the effects of these methods on the histologic quality of tissue sections, cost, and turnaround times. In the present study, these two methods were evaluated on 129 tissue samples taken from 40 submitted clinical specimens, 3 blocks per sampled location. Before processing, sample Group 1 (Control) was cut at routine 3–5 mm thickness. Sample Groups 2 and 3 were cut at 10 mm to ensure the thicker tissues would be poorly processed. Histotechnicians performed a subjective evaluation of all the samples at the time of embedding and microtomy. Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections from all samples were scored for histologic quality by two pathology residents. Thicker samples (Groups 2 and 3) were then reprocessed using either PD or SX methods, re-sectioned, stained, and then re-scored by the pathology residents. The two reprocessing methods equally improved quality scores and reduced the fraction of slides that were rejected. The PD method average preparation time was 66 minutes as compared to 250 minutes for the SX method. The PD method was easier to perform than the SX method, required less reagent, and was less susceptible to reagent spillage than the SX method.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01478885.2022.2062532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue occasionally requires reprocessing if the histologic quality of a section is inadequate for clinical diagnosis. The Pat Dry (PD) and the Serial Xylene (SX) methods are two techniques described in the literature to reprocess under-fixed and/or under-processed tissue samples. To date, no study has compared the effects of these methods on the histologic quality of tissue sections, cost, and turnaround times. In the present study, these two methods were evaluated on 129 tissue samples taken from 40 submitted clinical specimens, 3 blocks per sampled location. Before processing, sample Group 1 (Control) was cut at routine 3–5 mm thickness. Sample Groups 2 and 3 were cut at 10 mm to ensure the thicker tissues would be poorly processed. Histotechnicians performed a subjective evaluation of all the samples at the time of embedding and microtomy. Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections from all samples were scored for histologic quality by two pathology residents. Thicker samples (Groups 2 and 3) were then reprocessed using either PD or SX methods, re-sectioned, stained, and then re-scored by the pathology residents. The two reprocessing methods equally improved quality scores and reduced the fraction of slides that were rejected. The PD method average preparation time was 66 minutes as compared to 250 minutes for the SX method. The PD method was easier to perform than the SX method, required less reagent, and was less susceptible to reagent spillage than the SX method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
两种福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织后处理方法的比较研究
摘要福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织偶尔需要重新处理,如果切片的组织学质量不足以进行临床诊断。Pat-Dry(PD)和Serial Xylene(SX)方法是文献中描述的两种对固定和/或处理不足的组织样品进行再处理的技术。到目前为止,还没有研究比较这些方法对组织切片的组织学质量、成本和周转时间的影响。在本研究中,这两种方法对从40个提交的临床样本中提取的129个组织样本进行了评估,每个样本位置3个区块。在处理之前,样品组1(对照组)按常规厚度切割3-5 mm。样品组2和3在10mm处切割,以确保较厚的组织处理不良。组织技术人员在包埋和切片时对所有样本进行了主观评估。两名病理住院医师对所有样本的苏木精和伊红染色切片的组织学质量进行评分。然后使用PD或SX方法对较厚的样本(第2组和第3组)进行再处理,重新切片、染色,然后由病理住院医师重新评分。这两种再处理方法同样提高了质量分数,并减少了被拒绝的幻灯片比例。与SX方法的250分钟相比,PD方法的平均制备时间为66分钟。PD法比SX法更容易执行,需要更少的试剂,并且比SX方法更不容易受到试剂溢出的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1