Overcome Hardness by Hardness, Overcome Hardness by Softness: comparing The Tale of Igor’s Campaign and Records of the Grand Historian

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY VOPROSY FILOSOFII Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI:10.21146/0042-8744-2023-4-105-116
{"title":"Overcome Hardness by Hardness, Overcome Hardness by Softness: comparing The Tale of Igor’s Campaign and Records of the Grand Historian","authors":"","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-4-105-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Tale of Igor’s Campaign and Records of the Grand Historian are classic books of Russian and Chinese antiquity. Both of them are based on historical facts and combine the features of “literature, history and philosophy”. The main characters of the both works contain deep-rooted characteristics and typical fea­tures of the national cultures. Firstly, Igor was brave and resolute and went on a campaign for glory. Liu Bang assessed the situation, sacrificed his reputa­tion, saved his life and waited for an opportunity to strike back. One considers an attack a defense, and the other considers a retreat an offensive. Secondly, both of them behave rationally, their behavior is determined, respectively, by the de­sire for fame and the desire to preserve life. One considers glory, imbued with heroism and consciousness of suffering, as the goal of life. And according to an­other, humiliation and preservation of life are prerequisites for achieving victory. Thirdly, the pursuit of fame and the pursuit of life have different consequences. In Russia, “victory on the verge of defeat” can bring sanctity and a sense of glory. In China, the best solution is to “throw back the enemy’s troops without a fight”.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-4-105-116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Tale of Igor’s Campaign and Records of the Grand Historian are classic books of Russian and Chinese antiquity. Both of them are based on historical facts and combine the features of “literature, history and philosophy”. The main characters of the both works contain deep-rooted characteristics and typical fea­tures of the national cultures. Firstly, Igor was brave and resolute and went on a campaign for glory. Liu Bang assessed the situation, sacrificed his reputa­tion, saved his life and waited for an opportunity to strike back. One considers an attack a defense, and the other considers a retreat an offensive. Secondly, both of them behave rationally, their behavior is determined, respectively, by the de­sire for fame and the desire to preserve life. One considers glory, imbued with heroism and consciousness of suffering, as the goal of life. And according to an­other, humiliation and preservation of life are prerequisites for achieving victory. Thirdly, the pursuit of fame and the pursuit of life have different consequences. In Russia, “victory on the verge of defeat” can bring sanctity and a sense of glory. In China, the best solution is to “throw back the enemy’s troops without a fight”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以硬制硬,以柔制硬:《伊戈尔战役记》与《史记》之比较
《伊戈尔战役记》和《史记》是俄罗斯和中国古代的经典著作。两者都以史实为依据,结合了“文史哲”的特点。两部作品的主要人物都具有民族文化的深层特征和典型特征。首先,伊戈尔勇敢果断,为荣誉而战。刘邦审时度势,牺牲了自己的名誉,保住了自己的性命,伺机反击。一个认为进攻是防御,另一个认为撤退是进攻。其次,他们的行为都是理性的,他们的行为分别是由对名誉的渴望和对保存生命的渴望决定的。人们把充满英雄主义和苦难意识的荣耀视为人生的目标。根据另一种说法,羞辱和保全生命是取得胜利的先决条件。第三,对名誉的追求和对生活的追求有不同的后果。在俄罗斯,“濒临失败的胜利”能带来神圣和荣耀。在中国,最好的解决办法是“不战而退”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
期刊最新文献
The Guardian of the History of Philosophy: On Nelly Motroschilova’s Philosophical Beginnings Maimonides, Gersonides and Crescas on Prophets and Prophecy The Neurological Interpretation of the Myth-ritual Complex: Pro et Contra Worlds of Consciousness in the Context of Multiverse Conceptions Specifics of Expert Activity in Modern Applied Science (Review of Survey Results)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1