Inflorescent dignity: a reconstructive interpretation of Martha Nussbaum’s conception of dignity and its implications for education

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Ethics and Education Pub Date : 2021-05-18 DOI:10.1080/17449642.2021.1927319
Lia Mollvik
{"title":"Inflorescent dignity: a reconstructive interpretation of Martha Nussbaum’s conception of dignity and its implications for education","authors":"Lia Mollvik","doi":"10.1080/17449642.2021.1927319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The concept of human dignity arguably has great relevance to education as it is mentioned in several human rights and education policy documents on the national and international level, providing their moral justification. However, when the concept is discussed within philosophical research, it is often seen as consisting of two different conceptions – intrinsic dignity and attributed dignity. The paper seeks to challenge this binary through a reconstructive interpretation of Martha Nussbaum’s conception of dignity, proposing inflorescent dignity, as a more fully fledged way of understanding dignity and how it relates to education. Through use of a fictional example, I argue that inflorescent dignity, grounded in intrinsic dignity, has relevance to education because it gives rise to moral, relational, and thus pedagogical, demands on education to be primarily focused on human flourishing as well as the acknowledgement of human actuality and potential, and for this to permeate all levels of education.","PeriodicalId":45613,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17449642.2021.1927319","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2021.1927319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The concept of human dignity arguably has great relevance to education as it is mentioned in several human rights and education policy documents on the national and international level, providing their moral justification. However, when the concept is discussed within philosophical research, it is often seen as consisting of two different conceptions – intrinsic dignity and attributed dignity. The paper seeks to challenge this binary through a reconstructive interpretation of Martha Nussbaum’s conception of dignity, proposing inflorescent dignity, as a more fully fledged way of understanding dignity and how it relates to education. Through use of a fictional example, I argue that inflorescent dignity, grounded in intrinsic dignity, has relevance to education because it gives rise to moral, relational, and thus pedagogical, demands on education to be primarily focused on human flourishing as well as the acknowledgement of human actuality and potential, and for this to permeate all levels of education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
花序尊严:玛莎·努斯鲍姆尊严概念的重构解释及其对教育的影响
正如国家和国际层面的几份人权和教育政策文件中提到的那样,人的尊严概念可以说与教育有着巨大的相关性,并为其提供了道德依据。然而,当在哲学研究中讨论这个概念时,人们通常认为它由两个不同的概念组成——内在尊严和归因尊严。本文试图通过对玛莎·努斯鲍姆的尊严观的重建性解释来挑战这种二元性,提出了一种更成熟的方式来理解尊严及其与教育的关系。通过使用一个虚构的例子,我认为,建立在内在尊严基础上的根深蒂固的尊严与教育有关,因为它产生了道德、关系和教育学,要求教育主要关注人类的繁荣以及对人类现实和潜力的承认,并渗透到各级教育中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics and Education
Ethics and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Transforming relationships. Pedagogical tact as a utopian figure of mediation Tactlessness as condition for teaching tact: educational reflections based on Adorno Theorising education from within pedagogical tact: a matter of singularity, attunement, and rules-as-not-rules Parents as psychological coaches Joint attention, the pedagogical relation and pedagogical tact in the age of digital education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1