IMPLEMENTATION STAGE FOR CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN THE DANISH BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION SECTOR

IF 1.2 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Detritus Pub Date : 2021-09-11 DOI:10.31025/2611-4135/2021.15110
L. Ottosen, L. B. Jensen, T. Astrup, T. McAloone, Morten Ryberg, C. Thuesen, Solbrit Christiansen, A. J. Pedersen, Mads H. Odgaard
{"title":"IMPLEMENTATION STAGE FOR CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN THE DANISH BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION SECTOR","authors":"L. Ottosen, L. B. Jensen, T. Astrup, T. McAloone, Morten Ryberg, C. Thuesen, Solbrit Christiansen, A. J. Pedersen, Mads H. Odgaard","doi":"10.31025/2611-4135/2021.15110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The building and construction sector is selected by the European Commission as a key product value chain in the transition towards circular economy (CE) due to the major resource consumption, waste generation and GHG emissions from this sector. This paper reports the result from qualitative and semi-structured interviews with 30 Danish stakeholders from the sector on the current stage of implementation of CE and the research/innovation needs to scale circular construction from niche to mainstream. The interviews showed a large variety in the stakeholder’s stage of transition from hardly knowing the term to having CE as a major driver in their business. Some meant that scaling of CE is close to impossible and that material reuse will never develop to more than a niche, whereas others already offer full-scale circular solutions to clients. The interviews pointed at a need for a common definition and terminology for CE, methods for documenting the gains from the circular solutions (economic and environmental), methods for technical documentation of the quality of reused materials, processes which enables scaling, methods to implement CE in various systems such as digitalization and building passports, new value chains and framework conditions in support of circularity. Regardless these needs, demonstration projects of major importance to gain general knowledge have been built or are planned in Denmark. These demonstrations have different approaches: using todays waste from different industries as construction materials; reusing construction materials (the basic building, elements or processed materials); and designing new buildings for disassembly to enable future reuse.","PeriodicalId":44191,"journal":{"name":"Detritus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Detritus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2021.15110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The building and construction sector is selected by the European Commission as a key product value chain in the transition towards circular economy (CE) due to the major resource consumption, waste generation and GHG emissions from this sector. This paper reports the result from qualitative and semi-structured interviews with 30 Danish stakeholders from the sector on the current stage of implementation of CE and the research/innovation needs to scale circular construction from niche to mainstream. The interviews showed a large variety in the stakeholder’s stage of transition from hardly knowing the term to having CE as a major driver in their business. Some meant that scaling of CE is close to impossible and that material reuse will never develop to more than a niche, whereas others already offer full-scale circular solutions to clients. The interviews pointed at a need for a common definition and terminology for CE, methods for documenting the gains from the circular solutions (economic and environmental), methods for technical documentation of the quality of reused materials, processes which enables scaling, methods to implement CE in various systems such as digitalization and building passports, new value chains and framework conditions in support of circularity. Regardless these needs, demonstration projects of major importance to gain general knowledge have been built or are planned in Denmark. These demonstrations have different approaches: using todays waste from different industries as construction materials; reusing construction materials (the basic building, elements or processed materials); and designing new buildings for disassembly to enable future reuse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦建筑行业循环经济的实施阶段
由于主要的资源消耗、废物产生和温室气体排放,建筑行业被欧盟委员会选为向循环经济(CE)过渡的关键产品价值链。本文报告了对来自该部门的30名丹麦利益相关者进行定性和半结构化访谈的结果,讨论了当前实施CE的阶段,以及研究/创新需要将循环建筑从利基扩展到主流。访谈显示,在利益相关者的过渡阶段,从几乎不知道这个术语到将CE作为其业务的主要驱动力,存在很大的差异。有些人认为,扩大节能减排的规模几乎是不可能的,材料再利用永远不会发展到一个利基市场,而另一些人已经为客户提供了全面的循环解决方案。访谈指出,需要一个通用的CE定义和术语,记录循环解决方案(经济和环境)收益的方法,重复使用材料质量的技术文档方法,实现规模化的过程,在各种系统中实施CE的方法,如数字化和建筑护照,新的价值链和支持循环的框架条件。尽管有这些需要,丹麦已经建立或正在计划对获得一般知识具有重要意义的示范项目。这些演示有不同的方法:使用来自不同行业的废物作为建筑材料;再利用建筑材料(基本建筑、构件或加工过的材料);并设计可拆卸的新建筑,以实现未来的再利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Detritus
Detritus ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
45
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
CIRCULAR ECONOMY: AN HONEST APPROACH BOOKS REVIEW Detritus & Art THE PRESENCE OF PFAS IN WASTES AND RELATED IMPLICATIONS ON THE CURRENT AND PROPOSED EUROPEAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: A SYSTEMATIC CRITICAL REVIEW WASTE EGGSHELLS AS CATALYSTS: AN ENVIRONMENTALLY-FRIENDLY APPROACH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1