Surgical management of recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Expert Review of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.1080/17469899.2022.2152004
Lucy V. Cobbs, Taku Wakabayashi, Y. Yonekawa
{"title":"Surgical management of recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment","authors":"Lucy V. Cobbs, Taku Wakabayashi, Y. Yonekawa","doi":"10.1080/17469899.2022.2152004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair with modern surgical techniques provides high rates of anatomic success; however, anatomic failure may still occur with any primary surgery, including after pneumatic retinopexy (PR), scleral buckle (SB), and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), resulting in recurrent RRD. Areas covered This review includes a summary of surgical options and management strategies for eyes with primary failure of PR, SB, and PPV. Expert opinion No standardized protocol is available for determining the optimal secondary surgical options to treat recurrent RRD. However, understanding of the causes and characteristics of the re-detachment, expected anatomic success rates with each surgical option, and potential complications, may improve the outcomes after re-operations. Causes of primary failure include formation of new breaks, re-opening of the original breaks, missed breaks, and most commonly, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). Rescue PR, revision of SB, and reoperation with PPV with membrane peeling, relaxing retinectomy, and/or long-acting tamponade combined with or without encircling SB, are effective options depending on the cause of primary failure and characteristics and severity of the re-detachment. Further advances in the management of PVR, which is a major cause of primary failure, will help improve treatment outcomes for eyes with complicated recurrent detachments.","PeriodicalId":39989,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","volume":"17 1","pages":"395 - 404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2022.2152004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair with modern surgical techniques provides high rates of anatomic success; however, anatomic failure may still occur with any primary surgery, including after pneumatic retinopexy (PR), scleral buckle (SB), and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), resulting in recurrent RRD. Areas covered This review includes a summary of surgical options and management strategies for eyes with primary failure of PR, SB, and PPV. Expert opinion No standardized protocol is available for determining the optimal secondary surgical options to treat recurrent RRD. However, understanding of the causes and characteristics of the re-detachment, expected anatomic success rates with each surgical option, and potential complications, may improve the outcomes after re-operations. Causes of primary failure include formation of new breaks, re-opening of the original breaks, missed breaks, and most commonly, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). Rescue PR, revision of SB, and reoperation with PPV with membrane peeling, relaxing retinectomy, and/or long-acting tamponade combined with or without encircling SB, are effective options depending on the cause of primary failure and characteristics and severity of the re-detachment. Further advances in the management of PVR, which is a major cause of primary failure, will help improve treatment outcomes for eyes with complicated recurrent detachments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发性孔源性视网膜脱离的手术治疗
摘要介绍原发性孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)修复与现代外科技术提供了高的解剖成功率;然而,任何原发性手术仍可能发生解剖失败,包括充气视网膜固定术(PR)、巩膜扣合(SB)和玻璃体切割(PPV)后,导致复发性RRD。本综述综述了原发性PR、SB和PPV失败的手术选择和治疗策略。专家意见没有标准化的方案可用于确定治疗复发性RRD的最佳二次手术选择。然而,了解再脱离的原因和特征,每种手术选择的预期解剖成功率,以及潜在的并发症,可能会改善再手术后的结果。主要失败的原因包括新裂口的形成,原有裂口的重新打开,裂口错过,最常见的是增殖性玻璃体视网膜病变(PVR)。根据最初失败的原因、再脱离的特征和严重程度,救援PR、SB修复、再手术PPV并剥离膜、松弛性视网膜切除术和/或长效填塞联合或不包围SB是有效的选择。PVR是原发性眼病的主要原因,其治疗的进一步进展将有助于改善复杂复发性眼角膜脱离的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Ophthalmology
Expert Review of Ophthalmology Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The worldwide problem of visual impairment is set to increase, as we are seeing increased longevity in developed countries. This will produce a crisis in vision care unless concerted action is taken. The substantial value that ophthalmic interventions confer to patients with eye diseases has led to intense research efforts in this area in recent years, with corresponding improvements in treatment, ophthalmic instrumentation and surgical techniques. As a result, the future for ophthalmology holds great promise as further exciting and innovative developments unfold.
期刊最新文献
How Genome-Wide Association Studies Transform Care for Patients at Risk of Glaucoma. Systemic and Ocular Associations of Keratoconus. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS): a systematic review, implications for the sans case definition Stem cell therapy in retinal diseases: current evidence Morphometric analysis of orbital CT scan in a Jordanian sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1