DISCOURSOLOGY: TRENDS AND TASKS (theoretical overview)

Yu. O. Tomchakovska
{"title":"DISCOURSOLOGY: TRENDS AND TASKS (theoretical overview)","authors":"Yu. O. Tomchakovska","doi":"10.18524/2307-4604.2021.1(46).234404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the consideration of the main directions and tasks of modern discourse as a branch of linguistics. The term \"discourse\" is used in different meanings and is the subject of study in different scientific areas. The purpose of the article is to provide a brief overview of the main directions of discourse analysis and to outline the main tasks of discoursology as a branch of linguistics. Depending on the methodological orientation, researchers distinguish the following areas of discourse research: formal, functional (represented by semiotic and situational approaches) and activity-based. The opposition of personality-oriented and status-oriented discourse is relevant. In the first case, communicators who know each other well take part in communication, in the second case, communication is reduced to a dialogue between representatives of one or another social group. Personal discourse is represented by two main varieties – existential and everyday discourses. The peculiarity of everyday discourse is the desire to compress the transmitted information as much as possible, to reach a special abbreviated code of communication. Existential discourse is designed to find and experience essential meanings, here we are not talking about obvious things, but about the artistic and philosophical comprehension of the world. Status-oriented discourse is an institutional communication, i.e. speech interaction of representatives of social groups or institutions with each other, with people who realize their status and role opportunities within existing social institutions, the number of which is determined by the needs of society at a particular stage of its development. Among its varieties are political, administrative, legal, military, pedagogical, religious, mystical, medical, business, advertising, sports, scientific, stage and media types of institutional discourse. The researchers note that the list may be supplemented or modified. The key problems of discourse analysis remain the structure and stratification of discourse, the establishment of its features, units, categories, types; elucidation of ways of organizing various discursive invariants, development of methods and procedures of analysis and description of discourses.","PeriodicalId":34053,"journal":{"name":"Zapiski z romanogermans''koyi filologiyi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zapiski z romanogermans''koyi filologiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-4604.2021.1(46).234404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the consideration of the main directions and tasks of modern discourse as a branch of linguistics. The term "discourse" is used in different meanings and is the subject of study in different scientific areas. The purpose of the article is to provide a brief overview of the main directions of discourse analysis and to outline the main tasks of discoursology as a branch of linguistics. Depending on the methodological orientation, researchers distinguish the following areas of discourse research: formal, functional (represented by semiotic and situational approaches) and activity-based. The opposition of personality-oriented and status-oriented discourse is relevant. In the first case, communicators who know each other well take part in communication, in the second case, communication is reduced to a dialogue between representatives of one or another social group. Personal discourse is represented by two main varieties – existential and everyday discourses. The peculiarity of everyday discourse is the desire to compress the transmitted information as much as possible, to reach a special abbreviated code of communication. Existential discourse is designed to find and experience essential meanings, here we are not talking about obvious things, but about the artistic and philosophical comprehension of the world. Status-oriented discourse is an institutional communication, i.e. speech interaction of representatives of social groups or institutions with each other, with people who realize their status and role opportunities within existing social institutions, the number of which is determined by the needs of society at a particular stage of its development. Among its varieties are political, administrative, legal, military, pedagogical, religious, mystical, medical, business, advertising, sports, scientific, stage and media types of institutional discourse. The researchers note that the list may be supplemented or modified. The key problems of discourse analysis remain the structure and stratification of discourse, the establishment of its features, units, categories, types; elucidation of ways of organizing various discursive invariants, development of methods and procedures of analysis and description of discourses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发现论:趋势与任务(理论综述)
本文致力于考虑现代语篇作为语言学分支的主要方向和任务。“语篇”一词有不同的含义,是不同科学领域研究的主题。本文的目的是简要概述语篇分析的主要方向,并概述作为语言学分支的语篇学的主要任务。根据方法论取向的不同,研究者将话语研究分为以下几个领域:形式话语研究、功能话语研究(以符号学和情境研究为代表)和活动话语研究。人格导向话语与地位导向话语的对立是相关的。在第一种情况下,相互了解的传播者参与交流,在第二种情况下,交流被简化为一个或另一个社会群体的代表之间的对话。个人话语主要有两种类型:存在话语和日常话语。日常话语的特点是希望尽可能地压缩所传递的信息,以达到一种特殊的简短的交流代码。存在主义话语旨在发现和体验本质意义,这里我们不是在谈论显而易见的东西,而是在谈论对世界的艺术和哲学理解。地位导向话语是一种制度性的沟通,即社会群体或机构的代表与在现有社会机构中认识到自己的地位和角色机会的人之间的言语互动,其数量是由社会在特定发展阶段的需要所决定的。其种类包括政治、行政、法律、军事、教育、宗教、神秘、医疗、商业、广告、体育、科学、舞台和媒体类型的机构话语。研究人员指出,这份清单可能会被补充或修改。话语分析的关键问题仍然是话语的结构和分层,话语的特征、单位、范畴、类型的确立;阐明组织各种话语不变量的方法,发展分析和描述话语的方法和程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
SEMANTIC GROUP “ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION” IN THE ENGLISH AND UKRAINIAN PHRASEOLOGICAL PICTURE OF THE WORLD Y. TAWADA’S WORKS IN MULTICULTURAL CONTEXT INTONATION ORGANIZATION OF COMPLIMENT AND FLATTERY SPEECH ACTS IN ENGLISH FILM DISCOURSE TOURISM LEXIC IN FORMAL AND INFORMAL DISCOURSE THE THEME OF NEGATION IN THE VERBALIZED FIELD OF THE CONCEPT OF LAZINESS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1