Trust in the financial services context: a meta-analysis

IF 6.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Bank Marketing Pub Date : 2023-08-04 DOI:10.1108/ijbm-06-2022-0248
Fernando de Oliveira Santini, Luciene Eberle, W. Ladeira, G. S. Milan, Ana Paula Graciola, Cláudio Hoffmann Sampaio
{"title":"Trust in the financial services context: a meta-analysis","authors":"Fernando de Oliveira Santini, Luciene Eberle, W. Ladeira, G. S. Milan, Ana Paula Graciola, Cláudio Hoffmann Sampaio","doi":"10.1108/ijbm-06-2022-0248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis article presents a systematic framework with a meta-analytic approach to finding various antecedents, consequents and moderating effects of trust in financial services.Design/methodology/approachA meta-analysis of 165 articles was performed, which generated 272 observations in a cumulative sample of 86,968 respondents.FindingsThe results of this meta-analysis demonstrated seventeen antecedents of trust constructs and four consequents. Most of these relationships were meaningful and consistent. The authors also found some significant moderators related to culture (individualism, masculinity and long-term orientation) and context (innovation index and device type).Research limitations/implicationsThis meta-analysis reviewed the relationships found throughout the theoretical framework about the trust construct in financial service contexts, identifying new paths for future research. Some limitations, such as the non-use of qualitative studies and the selection of concepts, exist in the secondary data and should be noted.Practical implicationsThe present study can assist financial system managers in decision-making because the findings from the meta-analysis are more consistent than those from traditional primary surveys.Originality/valueThis research tested the impact of antecedents, consequents and moderators of trust in the financial services sector and presented significant results using a meta-analytic review. This meta-analysis contributes to the marketing literature by offering a set of empirical generalizations, including relationship coefficients and fail-safe calculated numbers (FSN).","PeriodicalId":51401,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bank Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bank Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-06-2022-0248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis article presents a systematic framework with a meta-analytic approach to finding various antecedents, consequents and moderating effects of trust in financial services.Design/methodology/approachA meta-analysis of 165 articles was performed, which generated 272 observations in a cumulative sample of 86,968 respondents.FindingsThe results of this meta-analysis demonstrated seventeen antecedents of trust constructs and four consequents. Most of these relationships were meaningful and consistent. The authors also found some significant moderators related to culture (individualism, masculinity and long-term orientation) and context (innovation index and device type).Research limitations/implicationsThis meta-analysis reviewed the relationships found throughout the theoretical framework about the trust construct in financial service contexts, identifying new paths for future research. Some limitations, such as the non-use of qualitative studies and the selection of concepts, exist in the secondary data and should be noted.Practical implicationsThe present study can assist financial system managers in decision-making because the findings from the meta-analysis are more consistent than those from traditional primary surveys.Originality/valueThis research tested the impact of antecedents, consequents and moderators of trust in the financial services sector and presented significant results using a meta-analytic review. This meta-analysis contributes to the marketing literature by offering a set of empirical generalizations, including relationship coefficients and fail-safe calculated numbers (FSN).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融服务背景下的信任:一项荟萃分析
目的本文提出了一个系统的框架,采用元分析方法来寻找金融服务中信任的各种前因、后果和调节作用。设计/方法/方法对165篇文章进行了荟萃分析,在86968名受访者的累积样本中产生了272个观察结果。结果该荟萃分析的结果显示了信任结构的17个前因和4个后果。这些关系中的大多数都是有意义和一致的。作者还发现了一些与文化(个人主义、男子气概和长期取向)和背景(创新指数和设备类型)有关的重要调节因素。研究局限性/含义这项荟萃分析回顾了金融服务背景下信任结构的整个理论框架中发现的关系,为未来的研究确定了新的途径。二级数据中存在一些局限性,如不使用定性研究和概念选择,应予以注意。实际含义本研究可以帮助财务系统管理者进行决策,因为荟萃分析的结果比传统的初级调查的结果更一致。原创性/价值这项研究测试了金融服务业信任的前因、后果和调节因素的影响,并使用元分析综述得出了重要结果。该荟萃分析通过提供一组经验概括,包括关系系数和故障安全计算数(FSN),为营销文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
18.90%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: International Journal of Bank Marketing (IJBM) aims to publish papers that relate to the marketing challenges of financial services providers around the globe. Preference is given to empirically-based research papers that expand on existing theories (or develop new ones) on customer behaviour in financial services settings. In addition, the journal is interested in helping academicians and practitioners in the field to better understand the discipline of financial services marketing, and as a result review papers and thought pieces are invited for submission.
期刊最新文献
Determinants of tweens’ saving intentions: a cross-sectional study What drives problematic Bitcoin investment behavior?: The role of financial literacy Dynamics of personal financial management: a bibliometric and systematic review on financial literacy, financial capability and financial behavior The augmenting role of digital banking in reconstructing women's economic empowerment Does leadership humility foster salesperson creativity? The serial mediating role of job satisfaction and knowledge sharing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1