Miloš Adžić and Kosta Došen, eds, Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame, Belgrade: Logical Society Belgrade, Dosije, 2017, 302 pp., ISBN 978-8660472399.

Q2 Arts and Humanities DIALECTICA Pub Date : 2019-05-29 DOI:10.1111/1746-8361.12247
Johannes Stern
{"title":"Miloš Adžić and Kosta Došen, eds, Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame, Belgrade: Logical Society Belgrade, Dosije, 2017, 302 pp., ISBN 978-8660472399.","authors":"Johannes Stern","doi":"10.1111/1746-8361.12247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book is at treat. The logic community should thank Miloš Adžić and the late Kosta Došen for their huge effort in editing Gödel’s lecture notes of his 1939 Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame. Adžić and Došen have turned a number of handwritten notebooks that served as the basis of Gödel’s course into—even by modern standards—an elegant logic textbook, which is a pleasure to read. The edited lecture notes highlight once again what a clear and lucid thinker Gödel was. The book consists of an editorial introduction in which the editorial decisions and the notational conventions are explained, the edited text of Gödel’s logic course, and the source text in printed form. The source text provides a good idea of the amount of work that has gone into the editing process. Gödel’s notes are full of abbreviations, a number of passages are crossed out and every now and then there are interludes in which Gödel is concerned with seemingly unrelated issues—for example religious questions. The material covered by Gödel consists of a thorough discussion of propositional logic, an introduction to first-order logic and to basic notions of the calculus of classes. The lecture notes end with a short discussion of Russell’s paradox and the theory of types. In this review I shall start by briefly commenting on the editorial introduction and a number of Adžić and Došen’s editorial decisions. I then provide a brief summary and discussion of the content of Gödel’s Basic Logic Course. Before I start I would like to point the interested reader to the work of Adžić and Došen (2016) and Cassou-Nogues (2009). These works provide an outline of the content of the Gödel’s Notre Dame lectures and comment on their philosophical and historical significance.","PeriodicalId":46676,"journal":{"name":"DIALECTICA","volume":"72 4","pages":"617-622"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1746-8361.12247","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIALECTICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1746-8361.12247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This book is at treat. The logic community should thank Miloš Adžić and the late Kosta Došen for their huge effort in editing Gödel’s lecture notes of his 1939 Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame. Adžić and Došen have turned a number of handwritten notebooks that served as the basis of Gödel’s course into—even by modern standards—an elegant logic textbook, which is a pleasure to read. The edited lecture notes highlight once again what a clear and lucid thinker Gödel was. The book consists of an editorial introduction in which the editorial decisions and the notational conventions are explained, the edited text of Gödel’s logic course, and the source text in printed form. The source text provides a good idea of the amount of work that has gone into the editing process. Gödel’s notes are full of abbreviations, a number of passages are crossed out and every now and then there are interludes in which Gödel is concerned with seemingly unrelated issues—for example religious questions. The material covered by Gödel consists of a thorough discussion of propositional logic, an introduction to first-order logic and to basic notions of the calculus of classes. The lecture notes end with a short discussion of Russell’s paradox and the theory of types. In this review I shall start by briefly commenting on the editorial introduction and a number of Adžić and Došen’s editorial decisions. I then provide a brief summary and discussion of the content of Gödel’s Basic Logic Course. Before I start I would like to point the interested reader to the work of Adžić and Došen (2016) and Cassou-Nogues (2009). These works provide an outline of the content of the Gödel’s Notre Dame lectures and comment on their philosophical and historical significance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米洛什Adžić和科斯塔Došen,编,Gödel的基本逻辑课程在巴黎圣母院,贝尔格莱德:逻辑学会贝尔格莱德,Dosije, 2017年,302页,ISBN 978-8660472399。
这本书很受欢迎。逻辑学界应该感谢米洛什Adžić和已故的科斯塔Došen,他们在编辑Gödel 1939年在巴黎圣母院的基础逻辑课程的讲义上付出了巨大的努力。Adžić和Došen已经将许多作为Gödel课程基础的手写笔记变成了一本优雅的逻辑教科书,即使以现代标准来看也是如此。经过编辑的课堂讲稿再次强调了一个清晰而清晰的思想家Gödel是什么。这本书包括一个编辑的介绍,其中编辑的决定和符号约定是解释,编辑文本Gödel的逻辑课程,并在印刷形式的源文本。源文本很好地说明了编辑过程中所进行的工作量。Gödel的笔记中充满了缩写,许多段落被划掉了,时不时还有一些插曲,其中Gödel关注的是看似无关的问题,例如宗教问题。Gödel所涵盖的材料包括对命题逻辑的全面讨论,对一阶逻辑和类演算的基本概念的介绍。课堂讲稿以对罗素悖论和类型理论的简短讨论结束。在这篇评论中,我将首先简要地评论一下编辑导言和Adžić和Došen的一些编辑决定。然后我提供了一个简短的总结和讨论Gödel的基本逻辑课程的内容。在我开始之前,我想向感兴趣的读者指出Adžić和Došen(2016)以及Cassou-Nogues(2009)的工作。这些作品提供了Gödel的巴黎圣母院讲座的内容大纲,并评论了他们的哲学和历史意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DIALECTICA
DIALECTICA PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Dialectica publishes first-rate articles predominantly in theoretical and systematic philosophy. It is edited in Switzerland and has a focus on analytical philosophy undertaken on the continent. Continuing the work of its founding members, dialectica seeks a better understanding of the mutual support between science and philosophy that both disciplines need and enjoy in their common search for understanding.
期刊最新文献
Biosafety Considerations for Viral Vector Gene Therapy: An Explanation and Guide for the Average Everyday-Hero Pharmacist. Robinson's Regress Argument from Vagueness to Dualism David Armstrong on the Metaphysics of Mathematics Are There Occurrent Continuants? Review of Willaschek (2018)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1