Defining and Analyzing Transformative Learning

H. Chad
{"title":"Defining and Analyzing Transformative Learning","authors":"H. Chad","doi":"10.4467/25439561LE.20.007.12998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an important difference between the phenomena we study and the names we call them or theories we use to explain them. Transformative learning theory is a human construction designed to describe a phenomenon, but it is imperfect at best. The author advocates a delineation of the terms. Namely, the term perspective transformation should be used to refer to Mezirow’s theory because it has only ever been used for his specific theory. The term transformative learning should be used to refer to the broad range of theories (including Mezirow’s) that attempt to describe and explain dramatic changes in how people experience, conceptualize, and interact with the world. The author uses transformative learning in adult education investigations to understand the experiences of military veterans transitioning from combat to civilian life, of breast cancer survivors navigating the psycho-social transition of their disease, of students from backgrounds of poverty attending community college, and even the negative transformation of people becoming radicalized into violent terrorism. There are many more situations that cause people to change, and those specific situations shape the processes that lead to change and therefore shape the eventual outcomes of that change. All of the theories and constructs in the transformative learning literature are nothing more than human creations designed to explain the phenomena associatedwith dramatic learning and change in adulthood. The value of transformative learning as a metatheory is to provide constructs in the form of analytic tools that scholars from disparate disciplines can use in working together to create better, more useful constructs for understanding that phenomena. There are identified and presented the analytic tools (definition, criteria, typology) to provide a framework for scholars to think carefully and with clarity about what they mean when using the word “transformation”. The need in more holistic, interdisciplinary understandings of transformative learning is substantiated, thus promoting the use of transformative learning as a metatheory.","PeriodicalId":34779,"journal":{"name":"Labor et Educatio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor et Educatio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/25439561LE.20.007.12998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is an important difference between the phenomena we study and the names we call them or theories we use to explain them. Transformative learning theory is a human construction designed to describe a phenomenon, but it is imperfect at best. The author advocates a delineation of the terms. Namely, the term perspective transformation should be used to refer to Mezirow’s theory because it has only ever been used for his specific theory. The term transformative learning should be used to refer to the broad range of theories (including Mezirow’s) that attempt to describe and explain dramatic changes in how people experience, conceptualize, and interact with the world. The author uses transformative learning in adult education investigations to understand the experiences of military veterans transitioning from combat to civilian life, of breast cancer survivors navigating the psycho-social transition of their disease, of students from backgrounds of poverty attending community college, and even the negative transformation of people becoming radicalized into violent terrorism. There are many more situations that cause people to change, and those specific situations shape the processes that lead to change and therefore shape the eventual outcomes of that change. All of the theories and constructs in the transformative learning literature are nothing more than human creations designed to explain the phenomena associatedwith dramatic learning and change in adulthood. The value of transformative learning as a metatheory is to provide constructs in the form of analytic tools that scholars from disparate disciplines can use in working together to create better, more useful constructs for understanding that phenomena. There are identified and presented the analytic tools (definition, criteria, typology) to provide a framework for scholars to think carefully and with clarity about what they mean when using the word “transformation”. The need in more holistic, interdisciplinary understandings of transformative learning is substantiated, thus promoting the use of transformative learning as a metatheory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转换学习的定义与分析
我们研究的现象与我们称之为它们的名字或用来解释它们的理论之间有着重要的区别。转换学习理论是一种人类结构,旨在描述一种现象,但它充其量是不完美的。作者主张对这些术语进行界定。也就是说,视角转换一词应该用来指代梅齐罗的理论,因为它只用于他的特定理论。变革性学习一词应用于指代广泛的理论(包括梅齐罗的理论),这些理论试图描述和解释人们体验、概念化和与世界互动的戏剧性变化。作者在成人教育调查中使用变革性学习来了解退伍军人从战斗生活过渡到平民生活的经历,癌症幸存者在疾病的心理-社会转变中的经历,贫困背景的学生在社区大学就读的经历,甚至人们变得激进成为暴力恐怖主义的负面转变。还有更多的情况会导致人们改变,这些特定的情况会影响导致改变的过程,从而影响改变的最终结果。变革性学习文学中的所有理论和结构都不过是人类的创造,旨在解释与成年后戏剧性学习和变化相关的现象。作为一种元理论,变革性学习的价值在于以分析工具的形式提供结构,来自不同学科的学者可以在合作中使用这些结构,为理解这种现象创造更好、更有用的结构。已经确定并介绍了分析工具(定义、标准、类型学),为学者们提供了一个框架,让他们在使用“转换”一词时仔细、清晰地思考自己的意思。对变革性学习进行更全面、跨学科理解的必要性得到了证实,从而促进了变革性学习作为元理论的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The value of work in the perspective of prospective and active teachers ”The Emi & Gracja’s backyard” – An innovative educational project for Polish children Employee Job Performance Studies in the Military Context: A Bibliometric Analysis School during the pandemic. Challenges and uncertainties Assessment Competence of Teaching Staff – a Factor in the Implementation of National Policy in the Field of School Competence Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1