Characteristics of Malaysian highly cited papers

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science Pub Date : 2017-05-31 DOI:10.22452/MJLIS.VOL22NO2.6
A. Noorhidawati, M. Y. I. Aspura, M. N. Zahila, A. Abrizah
{"title":"Characteristics of Malaysian highly cited papers","authors":"A. Noorhidawati, M. Y. I. Aspura, M. N. Zahila, A. Abrizah","doi":"10.22452/MJLIS.VOL22NO2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highly cited papers serve as a proxy for excellence. In this paper, we identify Malaysia’s highly-cited papers and explore the characteristics of these papers. The research question posed is “What characterizes Malaysian highly cited papers?” This study adopts the definition by Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicator, i.e. the highly cited papers are papers that received enough citations to be placed in the top 1 percent of the academic field of each 22 subject areas based on a highly cited threshold for the field and publication year. As a small scientific nation, Malaysia has a rather limited number of papers being highly cited, and we observed nine characteristics of highly cited papers based on 708 datasets obtained from the Web of Science. Malaysian highly cited papers are largely represented by articles, but reviews have higher impact. Typically, these papers have a low self-cited index and they are published in the First Quartile of the science discipline publications. The papers are mainly the outcome of national funded research; involve multiple co-authorship and international collaboration; affiliated to Malaysian research universities and Malaysian authors often play a dominant role as first or reprint authors. Partnership with scientists from Iran, Australia and UK may increase markedly the possibility of a Malaysian paper becoming highly cited. This investigation has shown that these are the characteristics of Malaysian highly cited papers, but to what extent can these be used as indicators need further investigation and discussions among the scientific community.","PeriodicalId":45072,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science","volume":"22 1","pages":"85-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/MJLIS.VOL22NO2.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Highly cited papers serve as a proxy for excellence. In this paper, we identify Malaysia’s highly-cited papers and explore the characteristics of these papers. The research question posed is “What characterizes Malaysian highly cited papers?” This study adopts the definition by Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicator, i.e. the highly cited papers are papers that received enough citations to be placed in the top 1 percent of the academic field of each 22 subject areas based on a highly cited threshold for the field and publication year. As a small scientific nation, Malaysia has a rather limited number of papers being highly cited, and we observed nine characteristics of highly cited papers based on 708 datasets obtained from the Web of Science. Malaysian highly cited papers are largely represented by articles, but reviews have higher impact. Typically, these papers have a low self-cited index and they are published in the First Quartile of the science discipline publications. The papers are mainly the outcome of national funded research; involve multiple co-authorship and international collaboration; affiliated to Malaysian research universities and Malaysian authors often play a dominant role as first or reprint authors. Partnership with scientists from Iran, Australia and UK may increase markedly the possibility of a Malaysian paper becoming highly cited. This investigation has shown that these are the characteristics of Malaysian highly cited papers, but to what extent can these be used as indicators need further investigation and discussions among the scientific community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚高被引论文的特点
高被引论文是优秀论文的代表。在本文中,我们确定了马来西亚的高被引论文,并探讨了这些论文的特点。提出的研究问题是“马来西亚高被引论文的特点是什么?”本研究采用汤森路透基本科学指标(Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicator)的定义,即高被引论文是指根据该领域和出版年份的高被引阈值,在每22个学科领域的学术领域中,被引次数达到前1%的论文。作为一个小型的科学国家,马来西亚高被引论文的数量相当有限,我们根据Web of Science获得的708个数据集观察到高被引论文的9个特征。马来西亚的高被引论文主要以文章为主,但评论的影响力更高。通常,这些论文的自引指数较低,它们发表在科学学科出版物的前四分位数。论文以国家资助研究成果为主;涉及多个合作作者和国际合作;隶属于马来西亚研究型大学和马来西亚作者通常作为第一作者或转载作者发挥主导作用。与来自伊朗、澳大利亚和英国的科学家合作可能会显著增加马来西亚论文被高引用的可能性。本次调查表明,这些都是马来西亚高被引论文的特点,但在多大程度上可以作为指标,需要科学界进一步的调查和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Increased risk of serious pneumococcal disease in patients with asthma
IF 14.2 1区 医学Journal of Allergy and Clinical ImmunologyPub Date : 2008-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.07.029
Young J. Juhn MD, MPH , Hirohito Kita MD , Barbara P. Yawn MD, MSc , Thomas G. Boyce MD, MPH , Kwang H. Yoo MD, PhD , Michaela E. McGree BS , Amy L. Weaver MS , Peter Wollan PhD , Robert M. Jacobson MD
Impact of comorbid asthma on severity of coronavirus disease (COVID-19).
IF 3.8 3区 材料科学ACS Applied Electronic MaterialsPub Date : 2020-12-11 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77791-8
Sang Chul Lee, Kang Ju Son, Chang Hoon Han, Ji Ye Jung, Seon Cheol Park
Impact of Asthma on the Severity of Invasive Pneumococcal Disease
IF 14.2 1区 医学Journal of Allergy and Clinical ImmunologyPub Date : 2008-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.12.095
R.K. Dhillon , H. Kita , B.P. Yawn , M.E. Mc Gree , A.L. Weaver , K.H. Yoo , P. Wollan , T.G. Boyce , R.M. Jacobson , Y.J. Juhn
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
A study on the election factors of ACM Fellow based on the co-authorship relationship Compromising quality parameters lead to fallout: a study of de-indexing of research journals Teaching strategies for library instruction: directions from the literature Strategies for building institutional repositories a case study of content recruitment in Malaysian higher learning institutions Exploring authors engagement in journals with questionable practices: a case study of OMICS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1