Are They All the Same? The Distribution of Personal Wealth Between the Left and the Right in Latin America

IF 1.6 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Politics in Latin America Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI:10.1177/1866802X20975036
Nordin Lazreg, A. Angel, Denis Saint-martin
{"title":"Are They All the Same? The Distribution of Personal Wealth Between the Left and the Right in Latin America","authors":"Nordin Lazreg, A. Angel, Denis Saint-martin","doi":"10.1177/1866802X20975036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional wisdom indicates that politicians in Latin America are all wealthy. However, the literature on both political elites and social origins of political parties indicates that we should expect differences in the capital accumulation of politicians depending on their ideological position. This study seeks to explore that question using financial disclosure forms made available in six Latin American countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Peru, and the Dominican Republic. We calculate the median wealth of the main political parties in each country and compared them according to their ideological position on the left–right continuum. We consistently find that the most right-leaning party in each country had a higher median wealth than the most left-leaning one. This relation is non-linear since centrist parties often represent anomalies in the distribution of wealth. When there are no ideological differences, we do not observe significant wealth differences either.","PeriodicalId":44885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Politics in Latin America","volume":"13 1","pages":"67 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1866802X20975036","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Politics in Latin America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X20975036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Conventional wisdom indicates that politicians in Latin America are all wealthy. However, the literature on both political elites and social origins of political parties indicates that we should expect differences in the capital accumulation of politicians depending on their ideological position. This study seeks to explore that question using financial disclosure forms made available in six Latin American countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Peru, and the Dominican Republic. We calculate the median wealth of the main political parties in each country and compared them according to their ideological position on the left–right continuum. We consistently find that the most right-leaning party in each country had a higher median wealth than the most left-leaning one. This relation is non-linear since centrist parties often represent anomalies in the distribution of wealth. When there are no ideological differences, we do not observe significant wealth differences either.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
它们都是一样的吗?拉丁美洲左右两派的个人财富分配
传统观点表明,拉丁美洲的政治家都很富有。然而,关于政治精英和政党社会起源的文献表明,我们应该预期政治家的资本积累会因其意识形态立场而有所不同。本研究试图利用六个拉丁美洲国家提供的财务披露表来探讨这个问题:阿根廷、玻利维亚、巴西、智利、秘鲁和多米尼加共和国。我们计算了每个国家主要政党的财富中位数,并根据他们在左右连续体上的意识形态立场进行了比较。我们一直发现,每个国家最右倾的政党的财富中值都高于最左倾的政党。这种关系是非线性的,因为中间派政党往往代表财富分配的异常。当没有意识形态差异时,我们也不会观察到显著的财富差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Presidential Debates and Electoral Preferences in Weakly Institutionalised Democracies: Evidence From 32 Latin American Elections Researching the Gap: Women in Latin American Political Science Citizens’ Stability of Electoral Preferences in Chile Since the Social Upheaval Assessing Congressional Institutionalization and Political Elites’ Renewal in Latin America Through Legislative Amateurism Lessons from a Late Adopter: Feminist Advocacy, Democratizing Reforms, and Gender Quotas in Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1