Comparison of Landfill Site Suitability Assessment Using Ahp and Fuzzy Ahp Methods

Q4 Environmental Science Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.5276/jswtm/2021.746
S. Fatima, Z. H. Ash’aari, M. Ramli, A. H. Sharaai, M. Chaudhry
{"title":"Comparison of Landfill Site Suitability Assessment Using Ahp and Fuzzy Ahp Methods","authors":"S. Fatima, Z. H. Ash’aari, M. Ramli, A. H. Sharaai, M. Chaudhry","doi":"10.5276/jswtm/2021.746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Landfill site selection is a multi-criteria decision problem and has strategic value for various countries. The conventional method for landfill site selection is not enough to address the vague nature of linguistic assessment. An integrated Fuzzy AHP method was used to resolve this\n issue. Suitability maps produced by conventional Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and integrated Fuzzy AHP methods were compared and validated, which adds a new dimension in the waste management field. Various environmental, socio-economic, and infrastructure factors were used as predictors,\n which included groundwater level, soil type, slope, land cover, distance to settlements, railways, roads, surface water sources, airport, power lines, wells, and protected areas. Relative Operation Characteristic (ROC) analyses gave results of 0.77 and 0.86 for the suitability maps of AHP\n and Fuzzy AHP, respectively. The landfill site suitability maps produced from this study could help urban planners, engineers, decision-makers, and land-use developers to make suitable decisions. Furthermore, the resulted integrated model showed the best suitability that could be implemented\n to resolve the fundamental landfill siting problems in other cities of Pakistan.","PeriodicalId":35783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5276/jswtm/2021.746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Landfill site selection is a multi-criteria decision problem and has strategic value for various countries. The conventional method for landfill site selection is not enough to address the vague nature of linguistic assessment. An integrated Fuzzy AHP method was used to resolve this issue. Suitability maps produced by conventional Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and integrated Fuzzy AHP methods were compared and validated, which adds a new dimension in the waste management field. Various environmental, socio-economic, and infrastructure factors were used as predictors, which included groundwater level, soil type, slope, land cover, distance to settlements, railways, roads, surface water sources, airport, power lines, wells, and protected areas. Relative Operation Characteristic (ROC) analyses gave results of 0.77 and 0.86 for the suitability maps of AHP and Fuzzy AHP, respectively. The landfill site suitability maps produced from this study could help urban planners, engineers, decision-makers, and land-use developers to make suitable decisions. Furthermore, the resulted integrated model showed the best suitability that could be implemented to resolve the fundamental landfill siting problems in other cities of Pakistan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ahp法与模糊Ahp法评价垃圾填埋场适宜性的比较
垃圾填埋场选址是一个多标准决策问题,对各国都具有战略价值。传统的垃圾填埋场选址方法不足以解决语言评估的模糊性。采用模糊层次分析法解决了这一问题。对传统层次分析法(AHP)和综合模糊AHP法生成的适宜性图进行了比较和验证,为废物管理领域增加了一个新的维度。各种环境、社会经济和基础设施因素被用作预测因素,包括地下水位、土壤类型、坡度、土地覆盖、与定居点、铁路、道路、地表水源、机场、电线、水井和保护区的距离。AHP和模糊AHP的适用性图的相对操作特征(ROC)分析结果分别为0.77和0.86。这项研究产生的垃圾填埋场适宜性地图可以帮助城市规划者、工程师、决策者和土地利用开发商做出适当的决定。此外,所得到的综合模型显示出最佳的适用性,可用于解决巴基斯坦其他城市的基本垃圾填埋场选址问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management
Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management Environmental Science-Waste Management and Disposal
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management is an international peer-reviewed journal covering landfill, recycling, waste-to-energy, waste reduction, policy and economics, composting, waste collection and transfer, municipal waste, industrial waste, residual waste and other waste management and technology subjects. The Journal is published quarterly (February, May, August, November) by the Widener University School of Engineering. It is supported by a distinguished international editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Roles of Public Financing to Address Urban Faecal Sludge Management (FSM) Services in Bangladesh: a Study of Dhaka And Faridpur Cities Removal of Nickel (II) Ion from an Aqueous Solution Using Red Brick as an Adsorbent Assessment of Solid Waste Management Practices and Role of Community Participation in Mettu Town, Ethiopia 'Clean Food': A Model for Safe and Sustainable Agriculture Towards Accomplishment of Circular Economy Improving Solid Waste Management Practices in Primary Schools in Ibadan, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1