Godforsakenness: Is Christian Unbelief Possible?

Q4 Arts and Humanities Caritas et Veritas Pub Date : 2020-09-30 DOI:10.32725/cetv.2020.037
Yulia Vintoniv
{"title":"Godforsakenness: Is Christian Unbelief Possible?","authors":"Yulia Vintoniv","doi":"10.32725/cetv.2020.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to the phenomenon of Godforsakenness viewed from philosophical and theological perspectives. The article presents the conception of the experience of Godforsakenness as a key element in fi nding spiritual reconciliation. Attention is focused on the fact that belief is impossible without (the despair of ) Godforsakenness, the collapse of meaning, and the cry to God for help. Having compared the thoughts of A. Camus and С. S. Lewis, we will argue that the suff ering of a human being appears in the centre of comprehension for both. The combination of critical positions of Albert Camus and С. S. Lewis provides the ground for asserting that both theology and philosophy, when it comes to the experience of Godforsakenness, mean the same thing but conceptualise it diff erently. Refl ections pivot around the fact that every person is constantly in search of God, and that most often this path is a sinuous curve: from unbelief to belief, etc. We call these transitions within the state of Godforsakenness the experience of being ‘without God’. Awareness of this makes it possible to regard atheism not only as a secular phenomenon but also as a theological problem that signals a disturbed balance in the faith in its quest for the living God, rather than for attractive theological formulas.","PeriodicalId":37904,"journal":{"name":"Caritas et Veritas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caritas et Veritas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32725/cetv.2020.037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the phenomenon of Godforsakenness viewed from philosophical and theological perspectives. The article presents the conception of the experience of Godforsakenness as a key element in fi nding spiritual reconciliation. Attention is focused on the fact that belief is impossible without (the despair of ) Godforsakenness, the collapse of meaning, and the cry to God for help. Having compared the thoughts of A. Camus and С. S. Lewis, we will argue that the suff ering of a human being appears in the centre of comprehension for both. The combination of critical positions of Albert Camus and С. S. Lewis provides the ground for asserting that both theology and philosophy, when it comes to the experience of Godforsakenness, mean the same thing but conceptualise it diff erently. Refl ections pivot around the fact that every person is constantly in search of God, and that most often this path is a sinuous curve: from unbelief to belief, etc. We call these transitions within the state of Godforsakenness the experience of being ‘without God’. Awareness of this makes it possible to regard atheism not only as a secular phenomenon but also as a theological problem that signals a disturbed balance in the faith in its quest for the living God, rather than for attractive theological formulas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
离弃神:基督徒不信是可能的吗?
本文主要从哲学和神学的角度来探讨上帝崇拜现象。这篇文章提出了上帝的经验的概念,作为建立精神和解的一个关键因素。人们的注意力集中在这样一个事实上:如果没有(对上帝的绝望)、意义的崩溃和对上帝的求助,信仰是不可能的。比较了A.加缪和C。S.Lewis,我们会争辩说,一个人的苦难出现在理解两者的中心。阿尔伯特·加缪和C。S.Lewis为断言神学和哲学在涉及上帝的体验时都意味着相同的东西,但在概念上却有所不同提供了依据。反思围绕着这样一个事实展开,即每个人都在不断地寻找上帝,而这条路通常是一条曲折的曲线:从不相信到信仰等等。我们称这些在上帝放弃状态下的转变为“没有上帝”的体验。意识到这一点,就有可能将无神论不仅视为一种世俗现象,而且视为一个神学问题,它标志着在追求活神的过程中,信仰的平衡受到了干扰,而不是追求有吸引力的神学公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Caritas et Veritas
Caritas et Veritas Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to publish original scholarly and popular articles written by specialists working in these areas and to provide a decent platform for communication about the interaction between these fields of study. The Journal is on the List of non-impacted periodicals published in the Czech Republic. Within its orientation on Christian reflections in the context of social sciences and humanities the journal Caritas et Veritas is devoted primarily to practical matters related to ethics, the assisting professions and pedagogy.The aim of the journal is to publish original scholarly and popular articles written by specialists working in these areas and to provide a platform for communication about the interaction between these fields of study. That is why it is the editorial board''s aim to keep the entire journal easily accessible for practitioners in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The scholarly and popular sections of the journal as well as reviews of publications in Czech and Slovak language are therefore published in Czech. At the same time the editorial board strives to ensure that the scholarly studies published in the journal take account of international discourse and are accessible to it. The editorial and scholarly studies are therefore published also in English translation, scholarly studies written originally in English or another world language are also published in this way.
期刊最新文献
From finding beauty to finding meaning? Essential desire and aesthetic experience as gateways for contemporary religious education Zkušenost se spirituálně zaměřenými intervencemi a postoje k nim v kontextu truchlení ve 21. století - předběžná zjištění u pomáhajících profesionálů v České republice Economic belongings of the literary genre of Czech rural realism of the second half of the 19th century in the context of educational values Near Strangers: a transcultural analysis of individual humanitarian giving Pestrost
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1