Classification Accuracy of Early Literacy Assessments: Linking Preschool and Kindergarten Performance

IF 0.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI:10.1177/15345084221081091
Katherine A Koller, Robin L. Hojnoski, Ethan R. Van Norman
{"title":"Classification Accuracy of Early Literacy Assessments: Linking Preschool and Kindergarten Performance","authors":"Katherine A Koller, Robin L. Hojnoski, Ethan R. Van Norman","doi":"10.1177/15345084221081091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A strong foundation in early literacy supports children’s academic pursuits and impacts personal, social, and economic outcomes. Therefore, examining the adequacy of early literacy assessments as predictors of future performance on important outcomes is critical for identifying students at risk of reading problems. This study explored the predictive validity of preschoolers’ literacy skills measured in the spring with the Individual Growth and Development Indicators 2.0 (IGDIs 2.0) to performance in the fall and winter of kindergarten as assessed by the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Next Edition (DIBELS Next) using Pearson product-moment correlations. In addition, the classification accuracy of student performance on the IGDIs 2.0 measures to the publisher-identified benchmark scores on DIBELS Next assessment in kindergarten was examined by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive power, overall correct classification, and kappa. Participants were 537 children from ethnically diverse backgrounds enrolled in an urban school district in the U.S. Northeast region. Results indicated small to moderate relationships between the individual IGDIs 2.0 tasks and DIBELS Next measures. Classification accuracy of student performance on the IGDIs 2.0 measures to the publisher-identified benchmark score on DIBELS Next composite in the fall and winter of kindergarten revealed inadequate levels of sensitivity; however, locally derived cut-scores improved sensitivity and specificity.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":"48 1","pages":"13 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084221081091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A strong foundation in early literacy supports children’s academic pursuits and impacts personal, social, and economic outcomes. Therefore, examining the adequacy of early literacy assessments as predictors of future performance on important outcomes is critical for identifying students at risk of reading problems. This study explored the predictive validity of preschoolers’ literacy skills measured in the spring with the Individual Growth and Development Indicators 2.0 (IGDIs 2.0) to performance in the fall and winter of kindergarten as assessed by the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Next Edition (DIBELS Next) using Pearson product-moment correlations. In addition, the classification accuracy of student performance on the IGDIs 2.0 measures to the publisher-identified benchmark scores on DIBELS Next assessment in kindergarten was examined by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive power, overall correct classification, and kappa. Participants were 537 children from ethnically diverse backgrounds enrolled in an urban school district in the U.S. Northeast region. Results indicated small to moderate relationships between the individual IGDIs 2.0 tasks and DIBELS Next measures. Classification accuracy of student performance on the IGDIs 2.0 measures to the publisher-identified benchmark score on DIBELS Next composite in the fall and winter of kindergarten revealed inadequate levels of sensitivity; however, locally derived cut-scores improved sensitivity and specificity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期识字评估的分类准确性:将学前和幼儿园表现联系起来
早期识字的坚实基础支持儿童的学术追求,并影响个人,社会和经济成果。因此,检查早期读写能力评估的充分性,以预测未来在重要结果上的表现,对于识别有阅读问题风险的学生至关重要。本研究探讨了春季用个人成长与发展指标2.0 (IGDIs 2.0)测量的学龄前儿童识字技能对幼儿园秋季和冬季表现的预测效度,并使用Pearson积矩相关性对基本早期识字技能动态指标下一版(DIBELS Next)进行评估。此外,通过计算敏感性、特异性、正、负预测能力、总体正确分类和kappa,检验了IGDIs 2.0指标对幼儿园DIBELS Next评估中出版商确定的基准分数的分类准确性。参与者是537名来自不同种族背景的儿童,他们在美国东北地区的一个城市学区就读。结果显示个体IGDIs 2.0任务与DIBELS Next测量之间存在小到中等的关系。幼儿园秋季和冬季学生在IGDIs 2.0测量上的表现与出版商确定的DIBELS Next复合基准分数的分类准确性显示敏感性水平不足;然而,局部衍生的切口评分提高了敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Reliability of Ratings of an English Language Arts Curriculum With the Curriculum Evaluation Guidelines What Is Important to Measure in Sentence-Level Language Comprehension? Universal Screening for Student Mental Health: Selection of Norming Group Validation of the Youth Internalizing Problem Screener in Singapore Using Empirical Information to Prioritize Early Literacy Assessment and Instruction in Preschool and Kindergarten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1