“Who made my clothes?” how transparency apps bring politics to cultural fields

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Journal of Consumer Culture Pub Date : 2023-04-07 DOI:10.1177/14695405231166875
Luuc Brans
{"title":"“Who made my clothes?” how transparency apps bring politics to cultural fields","authors":"Luuc Brans","doi":"10.1177/14695405231166875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the climate crisis accelerates, consumers, lawmakers, and activists demand transparent supply chains in industries that form the material backbone of cultural fields such as fashion. Consequently, new apps have emerged that promise to make supply chains transparent by translating opaque production data into easily comprehensible product ratings. Integrating the literature on transparency, cultural intermediaries, and digital consumption apps, this article asks: how do these apps, which I call transparency apps, afford politics in cultural fields and new political ways of consumption? Using fashion as a strategic case of a cultural field with strong material underpinnings, this paper combines a walkthrough analysis of Good On You, Retraced, and Renoon with interviews of employees of the first two. I found these apps to afford a politics of transparency consist of eco-progressive values embedded in ideologies of consumer rights and self-optimization, which elevates the technical-material logic of fashion at the cost of its aesthetic logic. This politics is usually offered in a personalized form resembling platformized cultural production. Transparency apps are thus politicizing cultural intermediaries that simultaneously enable and limit the political contestation of fashion. This article demonstrates how transparency apps bring politics to cultural fields, upsetting usual logics in the process, carrying implications for any cultural field that faces demands for supply chain transparency.","PeriodicalId":51461,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405231166875","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the climate crisis accelerates, consumers, lawmakers, and activists demand transparent supply chains in industries that form the material backbone of cultural fields such as fashion. Consequently, new apps have emerged that promise to make supply chains transparent by translating opaque production data into easily comprehensible product ratings. Integrating the literature on transparency, cultural intermediaries, and digital consumption apps, this article asks: how do these apps, which I call transparency apps, afford politics in cultural fields and new political ways of consumption? Using fashion as a strategic case of a cultural field with strong material underpinnings, this paper combines a walkthrough analysis of Good On You, Retraced, and Renoon with interviews of employees of the first two. I found these apps to afford a politics of transparency consist of eco-progressive values embedded in ideologies of consumer rights and self-optimization, which elevates the technical-material logic of fashion at the cost of its aesthetic logic. This politics is usually offered in a personalized form resembling platformized cultural production. Transparency apps are thus politicizing cultural intermediaries that simultaneously enable and limit the political contestation of fashion. This article demonstrates how transparency apps bring politics to cultural fields, upsetting usual logics in the process, carrying implications for any cultural field that faces demands for supply chain transparency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“谁做了我的衣服?”透明应用程序如何将政治带入文化领域
随着气候危机的加剧,消费者、立法者和活动人士要求在时尚等文化领域的物质支柱产业中建立透明的供应链。因此,新的应用程序出现了,它们承诺通过将不透明的生产数据转换为易于理解的产品评级,使供应链透明化。本文整合了关于透明度、文化中介和数字消费应用的文献,提出了一个问题:这些我称之为透明度应用的应用,是如何在文化领域提供政治和新的政治消费方式的?本文将时尚作为一个具有强大物质基础的文化领域的战略案例,结合了对Good On You、retracing和Renoon的攻略分析以及对前两家公司员工的采访。我发现这些应用程序提供了一种透明的政治,包括嵌入在消费者权利和自我优化意识形态中的生态进步价值观,它以牺牲美学逻辑为代价提升了时尚的技术-材料逻辑。这种政治通常以个性化的形式提供,类似于平台化的文化生产。因此,透明应用程序正在将文化中介政治化,同时使时尚的政治争论成为可能,也受到限制。这篇文章展示了透明应用程序如何将政治带入文化领域,在这个过程中打破了通常的逻辑,对任何面临供应链透明度要求的文化领域都有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consumer Culture is a major new journal designed to support and promote the dynamic expansion in interdisciplinary research focused on consumption and consumer culture, opening up debates and areas of exploration. Global in perspective and drawing on both theory and empirical research, the journal reflects the need to engage critically with modern consumer culture and to understand its central role in contemporary social processes. The Journal of Consumer Culture brings together articles from the many social sciences and humanities in which consumer culture has become a significant focus. It also engages with overarching contemporary perspectives on social transformation.
期刊最新文献
Exploring routinization and reflexivity in change and reproduction of consumption towards lower climate impact The lab, land, and longing: Discursive constructions of Australian identities in ‘future’ food consumption Reflecting on nation image and perceptions of nation brand: Scottish-themed pubs, bars and restaurants outside of Scotland Breaking through banal consumerism? Representations of postconsumerist perspectives in mainstream press media Eating the money: Diabetes and the embodiment of consumer culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1