Transnational Networks of Child Sexual Abuse and Consumerism: Edward Brongersma and the Pedophilia Debate of the 1970s and 1980s

IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of the History of Sexuality Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.7560/jhs31202
Jan-Henrik Friedrichs
{"title":"Transnational Networks of Child Sexual Abuse and Consumerism: Edward Brongersma and the Pedophilia Debate of the 1970s and 1980s","authors":"Jan-Henrik Friedrichs","doi":"10.7560/jhs31202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I n I t s A u g u s t 1973 I s s u e , the West German gay magazine du&ich reported on the first International Pedophile Meeting in Breda, the Netherlands, which was attended by “about 70 pedophiles and a number of interested listeners from the Netherlands, Belgium, France, the Federal Republic and Switzerland.”1 The main purpose of the meeting had been to end the isolation of pedophile men, but there had also been two academic lectures on the subject. In a photo attached to the article, one could see the two Dutch lecturers: the psychologist Dr. Frits Bernard and the lawyer and senator of the Partij van de Arbeid Dr. Edward Brongersma. A closer look at Bernard’s hands reveals an issue of the German educational studies journal betrifft: erziehung from earlier that year. The title theme of this issue had also been pedophilia and the question of its possible decriminalization. Bernard himself had written the central article, in which he formulated the thesis that “nonviolent and consensual” sexual contact with adults was even conducive to child development. With the choice of the issue’s title, “Pedophilia: Crime without Victims,” the editorial team had positioned itself clearly.2 At the meeting in Breda, Bernard distributed","PeriodicalId":45704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/jhs31202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I n I t s A u g u s t 1973 I s s u e , the West German gay magazine du&ich reported on the first International Pedophile Meeting in Breda, the Netherlands, which was attended by “about 70 pedophiles and a number of interested listeners from the Netherlands, Belgium, France, the Federal Republic and Switzerland.”1 The main purpose of the meeting had been to end the isolation of pedophile men, but there had also been two academic lectures on the subject. In a photo attached to the article, one could see the two Dutch lecturers: the psychologist Dr. Frits Bernard and the lawyer and senator of the Partij van de Arbeid Dr. Edward Brongersma. A closer look at Bernard’s hands reveals an issue of the German educational studies journal betrifft: erziehung from earlier that year. The title theme of this issue had also been pedophilia and the question of its possible decriminalization. Bernard himself had written the central article, in which he formulated the thesis that “nonviolent and consensual” sexual contact with adults was even conducive to child development. With the choice of the issue’s title, “Pedophilia: Crime without Victims,” the editorial team had positioned itself clearly.2 At the meeting in Breda, Bernard distributed
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童性虐待和消费主义的跨国网络:爱德华·布朗格斯玛和20世纪70年代和80年代的恋童癖辩论
1973年,西德同性恋杂志《du&e》报道了在荷兰布雷达举行的第一届国际恋童癖会议,大约有70名恋童癖者和一些来自荷兰、比利时、法国、联邦共和国和瑞士的感兴趣的听众参加了会议。会议的主要目的是结束对恋童癖男子的孤立,但也有两次关于这个问题的学术讲座。在附在文章后面的一张照片中,可以看到两位荷兰讲师:心理学家弗里茨·伯纳德博士和阿尔贝德党律师兼参议员爱德华·布隆格斯马博士。仔细观察伯纳德的手,就会发现当年早些时候德国教育研究期刊《bertrifft: erziehung》的一期。这个问题的标题主题也是恋童癖及其可能非刑事化的问题。伯纳德自己写了一篇中心文章,在这篇文章中,他阐述了一个论点,即与成年人的“非暴力和两厢情愿的”性接触甚至有利于儿童的发展。这期杂志的标题是“恋童癖:没有受害者的犯罪”,编辑团队已经明确了自己的定位在布雷达的会议上,伯纳德分发
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
New Zealand’s Military and the Disciplining of Sex between Men, 1940–1960 Whither Rape in the History of Sexuality? Thinking Sex alongside Slavery’s Normative Violence Libido mechanica: Image and Object before Sexual Psychopathology “Dear Lord, If It Were Up to Me, It Wouldn’t Happen”: Marital Duty, Consent, and Catholic Women’s Sexual Agency in 1950s French-Speaking Belgium Trip Away the Gay? LSD’s Journey from Antihomosexual Psychiatry to Gay Liberationist Toy, 1955–1980
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1