Three Case Studies on Small Uncrewed Aerial Systems Near Midair
Collisions with Aircraft: An Evidence-Based Approach for Using Objective
Uncrewed Aerial Systems Detection Technology
Ryan Wallace, S. Winter, S. Rice, David C. Kovar, Sang-A Lee
{"title":"Three Case Studies on Small Uncrewed Aerial Systems Near Midair\n Collisions with Aircraft: An Evidence-Based Approach for Using Objective\n Uncrewed Aerial Systems Detection Technology","authors":"Ryan Wallace, S. Winter, S. Rice, David C. Kovar, Sang-A Lee","doi":"10.4271/01-16-03-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small uncrewed aircraft systems (sUAS) growth continues for recreational and\n commercial applications. By 2025, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)\n predicts the sUAS fleet to number nearly 2.4 million units. As sUAS operations\n expand within the National Airspace System (NAS), so too does the probability of\n near midair collisions (NMACs) between sUAS and aircraft. Currently, the primary\n means of recognizing sUAS NMACs rely on pilots to visually spot and evade\n conflicting sUAS. Pilots may report such encounters to the FAA as UAS Sighting\n Reports. Sighting reports are of limited value as they are highly subjective and\n dependent on the pilot to accurately estimate range and altitude information.\n Moreover, they do not account for NMACs that an aircrew member does not spot.\n The purpose of this study was to examine objective sUAS and aircraft telemetry\n data collected using a DJI Aeroscope sensor and Automatic Dependent\n Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B)/Mode S messages throughout 36 months near a major\n United States (U.S.) airport. This data offers objective insights into the\n interaction of sUAS and aircraft in the airspace surrounding this airport. Using\n the data, three NMAC case studies are presented based on three varying mission\n profiles: (a) commercial air carriers, (b) general aviation (GA) aircraft, and\n (c) helicopters. The findings inform on sUAS-aircraft encounter evolution and\n trends, including areas of encounter risk, lateral and vertical encounter\n separation distances, sUAS operator compliance with operational and altitude\n restrictions, and comparisons of objective detection data against sUAS sighting\n reports. Recommendations are provided to mitigate risks associated with\n encounter trends to further enhance safety within the NAS.","PeriodicalId":44558,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Aerospace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Aerospace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/01-16-03-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Small uncrewed aircraft systems (sUAS) growth continues for recreational and
commercial applications. By 2025, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
predicts the sUAS fleet to number nearly 2.4 million units. As sUAS operations
expand within the National Airspace System (NAS), so too does the probability of
near midair collisions (NMACs) between sUAS and aircraft. Currently, the primary
means of recognizing sUAS NMACs rely on pilots to visually spot and evade
conflicting sUAS. Pilots may report such encounters to the FAA as UAS Sighting
Reports. Sighting reports are of limited value as they are highly subjective and
dependent on the pilot to accurately estimate range and altitude information.
Moreover, they do not account for NMACs that an aircrew member does not spot.
The purpose of this study was to examine objective sUAS and aircraft telemetry
data collected using a DJI Aeroscope sensor and Automatic Dependent
Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B)/Mode S messages throughout 36 months near a major
United States (U.S.) airport. This data offers objective insights into the
interaction of sUAS and aircraft in the airspace surrounding this airport. Using
the data, three NMAC case studies are presented based on three varying mission
profiles: (a) commercial air carriers, (b) general aviation (GA) aircraft, and
(c) helicopters. The findings inform on sUAS-aircraft encounter evolution and
trends, including areas of encounter risk, lateral and vertical encounter
separation distances, sUAS operator compliance with operational and altitude
restrictions, and comparisons of objective detection data against sUAS sighting
reports. Recommendations are provided to mitigate risks associated with
encounter trends to further enhance safety within the NAS.