An inquiry into the relationships between BOD5, COD, and TOC in Tigris River, Maysan Province, Iraq

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences caspian journal of environmental sciences Pub Date : 2021-09-28 DOI:10.22124/CJES.2021.5079
H. Alewi, Emad A. Abood, Gaith Ali
{"title":"An inquiry into the relationships between BOD5, COD, and TOC in Tigris River, Maysan Province, Iraq","authors":"H. Alewi, Emad A. Abood, Gaith Ali","doi":"10.22124/CJES.2021.5079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its universally wide use in water quality indices and evaluating the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants, chemical oxygen demand (COD) or biological oxygen demand (BOD5) analyses have disadvantages such as being imprecise, time-consuming, insensitive, as well as the production of hazardous wastes. Total organic carbon (TOC) will introduce as an alternative analysis, the relationship between BOD5, COD, and TOC has been investigated in this study. A total number of 216 samples were taken from three stations (kumait, Al Amara, and Al Majar Al Kabeer) in Tigris River, Maysan Province, Iraq. The sampling was on a monthly basis during a two-year period.  The tests were performed according to ASTM D7573 - 18ae1, ASTM D6238-98, and ASTM D125-06 for TOC, BOD5, and COD respectively at the Pollution Research Centre of the Al-Shatra Institute, the data were statistically analyzed using the SPSS program to predict a relationship between the COD or BOD5 and TOC. The analysis showed a good relationship concerning to a value of correlation coefficient, i.e., r = 0.93 or r = 0.94 between TOC and BOD5 or COD respectively, as well as the coefficient of determination, i.e., R2 = 0.91 or R2 = 0.92 between TOC and BOD5 or COD respectively. The validation of the suggested formulas has been tested using data from the Pollutant Centre in Al Shatra Institute for Shat al Gharaf River. The formulas gave reasonably acceptable values. It could be used in monitoring water quality and wastewater plants as a surrogate parameter to have pre-impression of the plant efficiency.","PeriodicalId":9640,"journal":{"name":"caspian journal of environmental sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"caspian journal of environmental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22124/CJES.2021.5079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Despite its universally wide use in water quality indices and evaluating the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants, chemical oxygen demand (COD) or biological oxygen demand (BOD5) analyses have disadvantages such as being imprecise, time-consuming, insensitive, as well as the production of hazardous wastes. Total organic carbon (TOC) will introduce as an alternative analysis, the relationship between BOD5, COD, and TOC has been investigated in this study. A total number of 216 samples were taken from three stations (kumait, Al Amara, and Al Majar Al Kabeer) in Tigris River, Maysan Province, Iraq. The sampling was on a monthly basis during a two-year period.  The tests were performed according to ASTM D7573 - 18ae1, ASTM D6238-98, and ASTM D125-06 for TOC, BOD5, and COD respectively at the Pollution Research Centre of the Al-Shatra Institute, the data were statistically analyzed using the SPSS program to predict a relationship between the COD or BOD5 and TOC. The analysis showed a good relationship concerning to a value of correlation coefficient, i.e., r = 0.93 or r = 0.94 between TOC and BOD5 or COD respectively, as well as the coefficient of determination, i.e., R2 = 0.91 or R2 = 0.92 between TOC and BOD5 or COD respectively. The validation of the suggested formulas has been tested using data from the Pollutant Centre in Al Shatra Institute for Shat al Gharaf River. The formulas gave reasonably acceptable values. It could be used in monitoring water quality and wastewater plants as a surrogate parameter to have pre-impression of the plant efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊拉克迈桑省底格里斯河BOD5、COD和TOC关系的探讨
尽管化学需氧量(COD)或生物需氧量(BOD5)分析在水质指数和废水处理厂效率评估中普遍使用,但其缺点是不精确、耗时、不敏感,以及产生危险废物。总有机碳(TOC)将作为一种替代分析,本研究研究了BOD5、COD和TOC之间的关系。共从伊拉克迈桑省底格里斯河的三个站点(kumait、Al Amara和Al Majar Al Kabeer)采集了216个样本。抽样是在两年期间每月进行的。根据ASTM D7573-18ae1、ASTM D6238-98和ASTM D125-06分别在Al Shatra Institute污染研究中心对TOC、BOD5和COD进行测试,使用SPSS程序对数据进行统计分析,以预测COD或BOD5与TOC之间的关系。分析表明,TOC与BOD5或COD的相关系数分别为r=0.93或r=0.94,TOC与COD或BOD5的决定系数分别为R2=0.91或R2=0.92。使用Al Shatra研究所Shat Al-Gharaf河污染物中心的数据对建议配方的验证进行了测试。这些公式给出了合理可接受的值。它可以用于监测水质和废水处理厂,作为一个替代参数,对处理厂的效率有预先的印象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
caspian journal of environmental sciences
caspian journal of environmental sciences Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biochemical responses of some aquatic plants as indicators for the treatment of inorganic nitrogen compounds in wastewater (Case study: Domestic water treatment plant in Babil Governorate, Iraq) Influence of nitrogen fertilizers on protein productivity of vetch-wheat grain under different water supply conditions Institutional mechanisms for unrelated agricultural support in the Russian Federation and the Federal Republic of Germany Energy and economic efficiency of corn silage production with flat grain of soy bean on reclaimed lands of upper volga Features of environmentally-friendly product obtaining from sugar and fodder beets in conditions of zinc contamination of sod-podzolic sandy loam soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1