A novel method to rapidly assess the suitability of water treatment residual and crushed concrete for the mitigation of point and nonpoint source nutrient pollution

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100010
O. Callery, M.G. Healy
{"title":"A novel method to rapidly assess the suitability of water treatment residual and crushed concrete for the mitigation of point and nonpoint source nutrient pollution","authors":"O. Callery,&nbsp;M.G. Healy","doi":"10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Freshwater ecosystems worldwide are at risk of becoming degraded as a result of excessive inputs of phosphorus (P) associated with terrestrial activities. This study describes a novel methodology to rapidly assess the potential of low-cost adsorbents which might be used to combat this issue. The ability of aluminum drinking water treatment residual (Al-WTR) and crushed concrete (CC) to remove P from dairy wastewater (DW) and forestry runoff (wastewaters representative of point and nonpoint P pollution sources, respectively) was assessed. In addition to predicting the longevity of these media in large-scale filters, potential risks associated with their use were also examined. The results indicate that both CC and Al-WTR show promise for use in removing P from forestry runoff, however the raised pH of effluent from CC filters may pose an environmental concern. Al-WTR showed greater promise than CC for the treatment of DW due to its higher adsorption capacity at high concentrations. Small releases of aluminum (13.63-96.17 μg g<sup>−1</sup>) and copper (5.25-31.9 μg g<sup>−1</sup>) were observed from both media when treating forestry runoff, and Al-WTR also released a small amount of nickel (0.16 μg g<sup>−1</sup>). Approximately 50% of total metal loss occurred during the first 25% of total filter loading, indicating that pre-washing of the media would help prevent metal release. These results indicate that field-scale tests are warranted for the treatment of both wastewaters with Al-WTR; CC is likely to be unsuitable for either forestry runoff or DW due to its effects on pH and its short lifespan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36714,"journal":{"name":"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100010","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590289X19300088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Freshwater ecosystems worldwide are at risk of becoming degraded as a result of excessive inputs of phosphorus (P) associated with terrestrial activities. This study describes a novel methodology to rapidly assess the potential of low-cost adsorbents which might be used to combat this issue. The ability of aluminum drinking water treatment residual (Al-WTR) and crushed concrete (CC) to remove P from dairy wastewater (DW) and forestry runoff (wastewaters representative of point and nonpoint P pollution sources, respectively) was assessed. In addition to predicting the longevity of these media in large-scale filters, potential risks associated with their use were also examined. The results indicate that both CC and Al-WTR show promise for use in removing P from forestry runoff, however the raised pH of effluent from CC filters may pose an environmental concern. Al-WTR showed greater promise than CC for the treatment of DW due to its higher adsorption capacity at high concentrations. Small releases of aluminum (13.63-96.17 μg g−1) and copper (5.25-31.9 μg g−1) were observed from both media when treating forestry runoff, and Al-WTR also released a small amount of nickel (0.16 μg g−1). Approximately 50% of total metal loss occurred during the first 25% of total filter loading, indicating that pre-washing of the media would help prevent metal release. These results indicate that field-scale tests are warranted for the treatment of both wastewaters with Al-WTR; CC is likely to be unsuitable for either forestry runoff or DW due to its effects on pH and its short lifespan.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种快速评估水处理残余物和破碎混凝土对减轻点源和非点源营养物污染的适用性的新方法
由于与陆地活动有关的磷(P)的过量输入,世界各地的淡水生态系统面临退化的危险。本研究描述了一种新的方法来快速评估可能用于解决这一问题的低成本吸附剂的潜力。评价了铝饮用水处理残余物(Al-WTR)和碎混凝土(CC)对乳制品废水(DW)和林业径流(分别代表点源和非点源P污染源的废水)中P的去除能力。除了预测这些介质在大型过滤器中的寿命外,还研究了与使用它们相关的潜在风险。结果表明,CC和Al-WTR都有望用于去除森林径流中的P,但CC过滤器出水pH值升高可能会造成环境问题。由于Al-WTR在高浓度下具有更高的吸附能力,因此在处理DW方面比CC具有更大的前景。在处理森林径流时,两种介质均释放出少量的铝(13.63 ~ 96.17 μg−1)和铜(5.25 ~ 31.9 μg−1),Al-WTR还释放出少量的镍(0.16 μg−1)。大约50%的总金属损失发生在过滤器总负荷的前25%期间,这表明预洗介质有助于防止金属释放。这些结果表明,有必要进行现场规模试验,以Al-WTR处理这两种废水;由于其对pH值的影响和寿命短,CC可能不适合用于森林径流或DW。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X
Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reconfiguring repair: Contested politics and values of repair challenge instrumental discourses found in circular economies literature WITHDRAWN: Development of an Input-output model for Food-Energy-Water Nexus in the Pacific Northwest, USA The re-direction of small deposit mining: Technological solutions for raw materials supply security in a whole systems context WITHDRAWN: Insights from combining techno-economic and life cycle assessment - a case study of polyphenol extraction from red wine pomace Being shown samples of composted, granulated faecal sludge strongly influences acceptability of its use in peri-urban subsistence agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1