Perbandingan Kinerja Block Storage Ceph dan ZFS di Lingkungan Virtual

Faza Abdani Auni Robbi, Agung Budi Prasetijo, Eko Didik Widianto
{"title":"Perbandingan Kinerja Block Storage Ceph dan ZFS di Lingkungan Virtual","authors":"Faza Abdani Auni Robbi, Agung Budi Prasetijo, Eko Didik Widianto","doi":"10.14710/JTSISKOM.7.1.2019.7-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growth of data requires better performance in the storage system. This study aims to analyze the comparison of block storage performance of Ceph and ZFS running in virtual environments. Tests were conducted to measure their performances, including IOPS, CPU usage, throughput, OLTP Database, replication time, and data integrity. Testing was done using 2 node servers with a standard configuration of the storage system. Server virtualization uses Proxmox on each node. ZFS has a higher performance of reading and writing operation than Ceph in IOPS, CPU usage, throughput, OLTP and data replication duration, except the CPU usage in writing operation. The test results are expected to be a reference in the selection of storage systems for data center applications.","PeriodicalId":56231,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/JTSISKOM.7.1.2019.7-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The growth of data requires better performance in the storage system. This study aims to analyze the comparison of block storage performance of Ceph and ZFS running in virtual environments. Tests were conducted to measure their performances, including IOPS, CPU usage, throughput, OLTP Database, replication time, and data integrity. Testing was done using 2 node servers with a standard configuration of the storage system. Server virtualization uses Proxmox on each node. ZFS has a higher performance of reading and writing operation than Ceph in IOPS, CPU usage, throughput, OLTP and data replication duration, except the CPU usage in writing operation. The test results are expected to be a reference in the selection of storage systems for data center applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在虚拟环境中,Ceph和ZFS的性能比较
随着数据的增长,对存储系统的性能要求越来越高。本研究旨在分析Ceph和ZFS在虚拟环境下运行的块存储性能的比较。进行测试以测量它们的性能,包括IOPS、CPU使用率、吞吐量、OLTP数据库、复制时间和数据完整性。测试使用具有标准存储系统配置的2个节点服务器完成。服务器虚拟化在每个节点上使用Proxmox。ZFS读写性能在IOPS、CPU占用率、吞吐量、OLTP和数据复制持续时间等方面均优于Ceph,但写操作CPU占用率不高。测试结果有望为数据中心应用中存储系统的选择提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
TATOPSIS: A decision support system for selecting a major in university with a two-way approach and TOPSIS Regional clustering based on economic potential with a modified fuzzy k-prototypes algorithm for village developing target determination River water level measurement system using Sobel edge detection method Classification of beneficiaries for the rehabilitation of uninhabitable houses using the K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm Sequence-based prediction of protein-protein interaction using autocorrelation features and machine learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1