Women of Colour and Black Women Leaders are Underrepresented in Architectural Firms Featured in Key Trade Publications

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Evidence Based Library and Information Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:10.18438/eblip30180
Nandi Prince
{"title":"Women of Colour and Black Women Leaders are Underrepresented in Architectural Firms Featured in Key Trade Publications","authors":"Nandi Prince","doi":"10.18438/eblip30180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Review of: Mathews, E. (2021). Representational belonging in collections: A comparative study of leading trade publications in architecture. Library Resources & Technical Services, 65(3).  https://journals.ala.org/index.php/lrts/article/view/7486 Abstract Objective – To measure how well women are reflected, specifically women of colour, in architectural trade publications. Design – Quantitative diversity audit.  Setting – Architecture field. Subjects – Architectural firms whose work appeared in four trade publications (Architectural Record, Architectural Review, l’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui, and Detail) in 2019. Methods – A diversity audit was selected to analyze the representation of various subsets of women within the architecture core collections. The Avery index was used to identify architectural firms featured in four trade publications. The quantitative study collected demographic data from 354 firms, featuring 726 women. Within these firms, the author sought to identify women leaders and how many of those were women of colour. The author then used four guiding questions to analyze the journals: (1) individual journals’ coverage; (2) size of the firm; (3) type of firm, and (4) firms which issued a statement in support of the Black Lives Matter Movement and the likelihood of a woman of colour being in a leadership role. Main Results – The key results for the studies guiding questions were: (1) the overall average of women leaders in the firms covered in the journals was 24% and for women of colour 6%. Architectural Record featured the highest proportion of firms with women in leadership roles (28%) and those with women of colour as leaders (9%); (2) women leadership was higher in smaller firms (large 24%; medium 20%; small 31%) as was women of colour in leadership (large 3%; medium 6%; small 9%); (3) insufficient data was found for meaningful analysis of the representation of women according to specialization within the architectural field; and (4) the firms that issued clear BLM statements were highest in the US (15%) overall. Architectural Record, a US publication, featured the highest percentage of firms that made clear BLM statements (27%). Conclusion – The study concluded that there was an underrepresentation of women, women of colour, and Black women in architectural trade publications. The author’s position is that collection development practices should adequately reflect the library users they serve with acquisition actions that increase a more equitable representation. The author stated that the practical implications for this study fall under the rubric of remediation in the following areas: (1) balance inequities in architectural programs by increasing enrollment of women; (2) identify collections which lack inclusivity, balance them with curated electronic resources; and (3) collection policies should reflect readership and encourage a sense of professional belonging. In future studies, the author acknowledges that a qualitative study based on responses from architects would complement the current study.","PeriodicalId":45227,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A Review of: Mathews, E. (2021). Representational belonging in collections: A comparative study of leading trade publications in architecture. Library Resources & Technical Services, 65(3).  https://journals.ala.org/index.php/lrts/article/view/7486 Abstract Objective – To measure how well women are reflected, specifically women of colour, in architectural trade publications. Design – Quantitative diversity audit.  Setting – Architecture field. Subjects – Architectural firms whose work appeared in four trade publications (Architectural Record, Architectural Review, l’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui, and Detail) in 2019. Methods – A diversity audit was selected to analyze the representation of various subsets of women within the architecture core collections. The Avery index was used to identify architectural firms featured in four trade publications. The quantitative study collected demographic data from 354 firms, featuring 726 women. Within these firms, the author sought to identify women leaders and how many of those were women of colour. The author then used four guiding questions to analyze the journals: (1) individual journals’ coverage; (2) size of the firm; (3) type of firm, and (4) firms which issued a statement in support of the Black Lives Matter Movement and the likelihood of a woman of colour being in a leadership role. Main Results – The key results for the studies guiding questions were: (1) the overall average of women leaders in the firms covered in the journals was 24% and for women of colour 6%. Architectural Record featured the highest proportion of firms with women in leadership roles (28%) and those with women of colour as leaders (9%); (2) women leadership was higher in smaller firms (large 24%; medium 20%; small 31%) as was women of colour in leadership (large 3%; medium 6%; small 9%); (3) insufficient data was found for meaningful analysis of the representation of women according to specialization within the architectural field; and (4) the firms that issued clear BLM statements were highest in the US (15%) overall. Architectural Record, a US publication, featured the highest percentage of firms that made clear BLM statements (27%). Conclusion – The study concluded that there was an underrepresentation of women, women of colour, and Black women in architectural trade publications. The author’s position is that collection development practices should adequately reflect the library users they serve with acquisition actions that increase a more equitable representation. The author stated that the practical implications for this study fall under the rubric of remediation in the following areas: (1) balance inequities in architectural programs by increasing enrollment of women; (2) identify collections which lack inclusivity, balance them with curated electronic resources; and (3) collection policies should reflect readership and encourage a sense of professional belonging. In future studies, the author acknowledges that a qualitative study based on responses from architects would complement the current study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在主要行业出版物中,有色人种女性和黑人女性领导者在建筑公司中的代表性不足
综述:Mathews,E.(2021)。收藏中的代表性归属:对建筑领域主要贸易出版物的比较研究。图书馆资源与技术服务,65(3)。https://journals.ala.org/index.php/lrts/article/view/7486AbstractObjective–衡量女性,特别是有色人种女性在建筑行业出版物中的反映程度。设计——量化多样性审计。设置–架构字段。主题——建筑公司,其作品于2019年出现在四本行业出版物(《建筑记录》、《建筑评论》、《今日建筑》和《细节》)中。方法——选择了一项多样性审计,以分析建筑核心收藏中不同女性子集的代表性。埃弗里指数被用来识别四份行业出版物中的建筑公司。这项定量研究收集了354家公司的人口统计数据,其中726名为女性。在这些公司中,作者试图确定女性领导者,以及其中有多少是有色人种女性。然后,作者用四个指导性问题对期刊进行了分析:(1)个别期刊的报道;(2) 公司规模;(3) 以及(4)发表声明支持“黑人的命也是命”运动和有色人种女性担任领导角色的可能性的公司。主要结果——指导问题的研究的关键结果是:(1)期刊报道的公司中女性领导者的总体平均水平为24%,有色人种女性为6%。《建筑记录》中女性担任领导职务的公司比例最高(28%),有色人种女性担任领导的公司比例(9%);(2) 女性在小公司的领导能力更高(大公司24%;中公司20%;小公司31%),有色人种女性在领导能力方面也更高(高公司3%;中公司6%;小公司9%);(3) 没有发现足够的数据来根据建筑领域的专业化对女性代表性进行有意义的分析;以及(4)发布明确的土地管理局声明的公司总体上在美国最高(15%)。美国出版物《建筑记录》(Architectural Record)中,明确发表土地管理局声明的公司比例最高(27%)。结论——该研究得出结论,建筑行业出版物中女性、有色人种女性和黑人女性的代表性不足。作者的立场是,藏品开发实践应充分反映他们所服务的图书馆用户的购买行为,以增加更公平的代表性。作者指出,这项研究的实际意义属于以下领域的补救措施:(1)通过增加女性入学人数来平衡建筑项目中的不公平现象;(2) 识别缺乏包容性的收藏品,并将其与策划的电子资源相平衡;(3)收藏政策应反映读者群,鼓励职业归属感。在未来的研究中,作者承认,基于建筑师回应的定性研究将补充当前的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evidence Summary Theme: All Things Virtual Call for Applicants for EBLIP Journal: Production Editor Differences Between the Perception and Use of Virtual Reference Services for Complex Questions Experiences, Benefits, and Challenges of Virtual Teamwork for Public Libraries in the US Midwest during the COVID-19 Pandemic Bangladesh Public Libraries' Response to COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1