The STEM pipeline: pathways and influences on participation and achievement of equity groups

IF 2.7 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management Pub Date : 2023-02-16 DOI:10.1080/1360080X.2023.2180169
D. Edwards, S. Buckley, N. Chiavaroli, S. Rothman, J. McMillan
{"title":"The STEM pipeline: pathways and influences on participation and achievement of equity groups","authors":"D. Edwards, S. Buckley, N. Chiavaroli, S. Rothman, J. McMillan","doi":"10.1080/1360080X.2023.2180169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Skills in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) are promoted by the Australian government as pivotal for Australia’s economic prosperity. Research on equity groups suggests that group membership is associated with several factors linked to ‘leakage’ from the STEM pipeline of school, university and transition to work. In this paper we draw on longitudinal Australian data to understand what factors influence the participation of equity group students in university STEM courses, and to explore how the STEM pathways of those groups differ from those of non-equity students. We identified several important factors which influence participation at two critical points of the STEM pipeline; transition from school into university, and transition from university into the STEM workforce. Our results indicated that higher levels of mathematics self-concept and instrumental valuing of mathematics in early adolescence predict continuation in the STEM pathway for all students and particularly those from low socioeconomic status backgrounds.","PeriodicalId":51489,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management","volume":"45 1","pages":"206 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2023.2180169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Skills in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) are promoted by the Australian government as pivotal for Australia’s economic prosperity. Research on equity groups suggests that group membership is associated with several factors linked to ‘leakage’ from the STEM pipeline of school, university and transition to work. In this paper we draw on longitudinal Australian data to understand what factors influence the participation of equity group students in university STEM courses, and to explore how the STEM pathways of those groups differ from those of non-equity students. We identified several important factors which influence participation at two critical points of the STEM pipeline; transition from school into university, and transition from university into the STEM workforce. Our results indicated that higher levels of mathematics self-concept and instrumental valuing of mathematics in early adolescence predict continuation in the STEM pathway for all students and particularly those from low socioeconomic status backgrounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STEM管道:股权集团参与和成就的途径和影响
摘要科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)技能被澳大利亚政府视为澳大利亚经济繁荣的关键。对公平团体的研究表明,团体成员资格与学校、大学和向工作过渡的STEM管道“泄漏”有关的几个因素有关。在本文中,我们利用澳大利亚的纵向数据来了解哪些因素影响公平群体学生参与大学STEM课程,并探索这些群体的STEM途径与非公平群体学生的STEM路径有何不同。我们确定了影响STEM管道两个关键点参与的几个重要因素;从学校过渡到大学,从大学过渡到STEM劳动力队伍。我们的研究结果表明,青春期早期较高水平的数学自我概念和数学工具价值预测了所有学生,特别是那些社会经济地位低的学生,继续学习STEM途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management is an international journal of professional experience and ideas in post-secondary education. It is a must read for those seeking to influence educational policy making. The journal also aims to be of use to managers and senior academic staff who seek to place their work and interests in a broad context and influence educational policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the notion of feminine leadership in Kuwait’s private universities Using self-determination theory as a lens to create sustainable futures for teaching and education focused academics in higher education in Australia What makes a Thesis by Publication? An international study of policy requirements and restrictions Growth mindsets in academics and academia: a review of influence and interventions Academic excellence initiatives: global perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1