Differences in male and female lower extremity joint kinematics during walking

Q4 Medicine Rehabilitacja Medyczna Pub Date : 2019-08-28 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0013.3767
K. Szymańska, M. Domzalski, A. Stolarczyk
{"title":"Differences in male and female lower extremity joint kinematics during walking","authors":"K. Szymańska, M. Domzalski, A. Stolarczyk","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.3767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Men and women are claimed to walk differently- with modern techniques we are able to quantify gait parameters and establish whether those perceived dissimilarities are supported by precise measurements. Creating separate normative values for men and women may help in gait disturbances diagnosis, prevention and therapy.\nObjectives: We review available studies on normal locomotion in adult men and women, to clarify if there is scientific evidence to create separate normative values of normal gait according to gender.\nMethods: Potentially relevant articles were identified with an electronic search of PubMed, Web of Science and Science Direct. Combination of keywords ‘gait’, ‘sex’, ‘gender’, ‘men’, ‘women’, ‘male’, ‘female’ were used. Articles were included if they met following criteria: article was written in English, the article contained information about non-pathological subjects, the study analyzed biomechanics of walking, the article compared metrics of both sexes, the study included data for adults. If additional papers were identified from cited references and met the inclusion criteria they were incorporated into the catalog of references.\nResults: The inclusion criteria was met by 12 articles. After reviewing abstracts and full-text articles 8 were included and 4 were excluded due to not applying common gait biomechanics parameters or studying gait biomechanics for purposes not connected to the review’s topic.\nConclusions: There are differences between males’ and females’ gait kinematic values for coronal plane pelvis and hip movement and possibly in sagittal plane ankle movement. Creating separate normative values is recommended.\n\n","PeriodicalId":35329,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacja Medyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacja Medyczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.3767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Men and women are claimed to walk differently- with modern techniques we are able to quantify gait parameters and establish whether those perceived dissimilarities are supported by precise measurements. Creating separate normative values for men and women may help in gait disturbances diagnosis, prevention and therapy. Objectives: We review available studies on normal locomotion in adult men and women, to clarify if there is scientific evidence to create separate normative values of normal gait according to gender. Methods: Potentially relevant articles were identified with an electronic search of PubMed, Web of Science and Science Direct. Combination of keywords ‘gait’, ‘sex’, ‘gender’, ‘men’, ‘women’, ‘male’, ‘female’ were used. Articles were included if they met following criteria: article was written in English, the article contained information about non-pathological subjects, the study analyzed biomechanics of walking, the article compared metrics of both sexes, the study included data for adults. If additional papers were identified from cited references and met the inclusion criteria they were incorporated into the catalog of references. Results: The inclusion criteria was met by 12 articles. After reviewing abstracts and full-text articles 8 were included and 4 were excluded due to not applying common gait biomechanics parameters or studying gait biomechanics for purposes not connected to the review’s topic. Conclusions: There are differences between males’ and females’ gait kinematic values for coronal plane pelvis and hip movement and possibly in sagittal plane ankle movement. Creating separate normative values is recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行走过程中男性和女性下肢关节运动学的差异
引言:男性和女性的行走方式不同——通过现代技术,我们能够量化步态参数,并确定这些感知到的差异是否得到了精确测量的支持。为男性和女性创造单独的规范性价值观可能有助于步态障碍的诊断、预防和治疗。目的:我们回顾了关于成年男性和女性正常运动的现有研究,以澄清是否有科学证据可以根据性别建立正常步态的单独规范值。方法:通过PubMed、Web of Science和Science Direct的电子搜索来确定潜在的相关文章。使用关键词“步态”、“性别”、“性”、“男性”、“女性”、“男”、“女”的组合。如果文章符合以下标准,则将其包括在内:文章用英语撰写,文章包含非病理性受试者的信息,研究分析了行走的生物力学,文章比较了两性的指标,研究包括了成年人的数据。如果从引用的参考文献中发现了其他论文,并符合纳入标准,则将其纳入参考文献目录。结果:12篇文章符合入选标准。在回顾摘要和全文后,由于没有应用常见的步态生物力学参数或出于与综述主题无关的目的研究步态生物力学,纳入了8篇文章,排除了4篇文章。结论:男性和女性在冠状面骨盆和髋关节运动以及矢状面踝关节运动方面的步态运动学值存在差异。建议创建单独的规范值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitacja Medyczna
Rehabilitacja Medyczna Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rheological Properties of Blood in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers Treated with Local Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy - Preliminary Report Functional Patterns and Postural Balance in Young Women With Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain and Healthy Individuals Comparing Influence of Thermal Effects in Experimental Models - Thermotherapy in Medical Rehabilitation Development and Reliability of Parents' Body Posture Literacy Questionnaire (PBPLQ) Effect of Selected Kinesiology Taping Applications on Reducing Pain and Accelerating Rehabilitation in Children with Osgood-Schlatter Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1