Assessing a Consortium for a Multidisciplinary Subject

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Collection Management Pub Date : 2020-04-13 DOI:10.1080/01462679.2020.1750522
Sue F. Phelps
{"title":"Assessing a Consortium for a Multidisciplinary Subject","authors":"Sue F. Phelps","doi":"10.1080/01462679.2020.1750522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper reports on a study to assess the Orbis Cascade Alliance’s print collection for material supporting the Black experience. It covers descriptions of general methods used for collection assessment as well as those used to assess the Alliance including Brief Tests, List Checking, and Comparison Studies. Each method is described with its strengths and weaknesses as well as their application to a consortium of libraries with Black experience being the subject matter of the material collected. These methods can be used for other multidisciplinary topics. Issues with subject headings, publishing, acquisitions, and racism emerged during the study and are covered in the discussion.","PeriodicalId":43910,"journal":{"name":"Collection Management","volume":"46 1","pages":"35 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01462679.2020.1750522","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2020.1750522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper reports on a study to assess the Orbis Cascade Alliance’s print collection for material supporting the Black experience. It covers descriptions of general methods used for collection assessment as well as those used to assess the Alliance including Brief Tests, List Checking, and Comparison Studies. Each method is described with its strengths and weaknesses as well as their application to a consortium of libraries with Black experience being the subject matter of the material collected. These methods can be used for other multidisciplinary topics. Issues with subject headings, publishing, acquisitions, and racism emerged during the study and are covered in the discussion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估一个多学科的联合体
摘要本文报告了一项研究,以评估奥比斯喀斯喀特联盟的印刷品收集材料支持黑人的经历。它涵盖了用于收集评估的一般方法的描述,以及用于评估联盟的方法,包括简短测试、清单检查和比较研究。每种方法都描述了其优点和缺点,以及它们在以黑人经验为主题的图书馆联盟中的应用。这些方法可用于其他多学科课题。主题标题、出版、收购和种族主义等问题在研究过程中出现,并在讨论中讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Collection Management
Collection Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
44.40%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The management and development of library collections is constantly evolving. Collection Management is the essential refereed quarterly journal that presents practical, research-based information about building, administering, preserving, assessing, and organizing library collections. The journal offers library professionals of all types crucial guidance in the fast-changing field of collection management, including the latest developments in sharing and providing access to resources, creating digital collections, preserving both traditional and digital library resources, applying technological developments to managing collections, training and developing staff.
期刊最新文献
We May Be Visually or Hearing Impaired, but We Need Access to Visual and Auditory Information Life After Lovelace: A Select Bibliography of Women in Computer Science Selection of Library Materials in the University Libraries of Pakistan: A Survey of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Exploring Collection Development Policies at R1 Research University Libraries Plays or e-Plays? Informing a Theater Collection Strategy Using Student Input
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1