Is Australia

IF 1.6 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pacific Conservation Biology Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI:10.1071/pc20077
K. Ashman, D. Watchorn, D. Lindenmayer, Martin F. J. Taylor
{"title":"Is Australia","authors":"K. Ashman, D. Watchorn, D. Lindenmayer, Martin F. J. Taylor","doi":"10.1071/pc20077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective environmental legislation that mitigates threats and strengthens protection are critical in arresting the decline of global biodiversity. We used the national listing of an Australian marsupial, the greater glider (Petauroides spp.), vulnerable to extinction under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC), as a case study to evaluate the effectiveness of legislation for protecting threatened species habitat. We quantified the extent of greater glider habitat destroyed (or extensively modified) due to deforestation and logging in Queensland and New South Wales (NSW), and logging in Victoria, 2 years before (2014–2016) and after (2016–2018) EPBC listing. We quantified the extent of greater glider habitat that burned in the 2019–2020 wildfires. Destruction of habitat increased in NSW and Queensland after the species was listed as vulnerable (NSW: 7602 ha/annum c.f. 7945 ha/annum; Qld: 1501 ha/annum c.f. 5919 ha/annum). In Victoria, the amount of habitat logged remained relatively consistent pre- and post-listing (4916.5 ha logged pre-listing c.f. 4758.5 ha logged post-listing). Australia-wide, we estimate that 29% of greater glider habitat burned in the 2019–2020 wildfires. Fire severity was severe or extreme in 37% of greater glider habitat that burnt, suggesting that few gliders would persist in these areas. We demonstrate that since EPBC listing, greater glider habitat destruction and population decline has continued as a result of human activities, both directly (i.e. deforestation and logging) and indirectly (i.e. severe wildfire facilitated by human-induced climate change). We recommend that state and federal protections should be strengthened urgently to better conserve threatened species and the environment.","PeriodicalId":38939,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Conservation Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/pc20077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Effective environmental legislation that mitigates threats and strengthens protection are critical in arresting the decline of global biodiversity. We used the national listing of an Australian marsupial, the greater glider (Petauroides spp.), vulnerable to extinction under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC), as a case study to evaluate the effectiveness of legislation for protecting threatened species habitat. We quantified the extent of greater glider habitat destroyed (or extensively modified) due to deforestation and logging in Queensland and New South Wales (NSW), and logging in Victoria, 2 years before (2014–2016) and after (2016–2018) EPBC listing. We quantified the extent of greater glider habitat that burned in the 2019–2020 wildfires. Destruction of habitat increased in NSW and Queensland after the species was listed as vulnerable (NSW: 7602 ha/annum c.f. 7945 ha/annum; Qld: 1501 ha/annum c.f. 5919 ha/annum). In Victoria, the amount of habitat logged remained relatively consistent pre- and post-listing (4916.5 ha logged pre-listing c.f. 4758.5 ha logged post-listing). Australia-wide, we estimate that 29% of greater glider habitat burned in the 2019–2020 wildfires. Fire severity was severe or extreme in 37% of greater glider habitat that burnt, suggesting that few gliders would persist in these areas. We demonstrate that since EPBC listing, greater glider habitat destruction and population decline has continued as a result of human activities, both directly (i.e. deforestation and logging) and indirectly (i.e. severe wildfire facilitated by human-induced climate change). We recommend that state and federal protections should be strengthened urgently to better conserve threatened species and the environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是澳大利亚
减轻威胁和加强保护的有效环境立法对于制止全球生物多样性的下降至关重要。我们以1999年《环境保护和生物多样性保护法》(EPBC)对澳大利亚有袋动物大滑翔机(Petauroides spp.)的国家名录为例,评估立法保护濒危物种栖息地的有效性。我们量化了昆士兰州和新南威尔士州(NSW)的森林砍伐和伐木,以及维多利亚州的伐木,在EPBC上市前(2014-2016)和之后(2016-2018)的两年里,更大的滑翔机栖息地被破坏(或广泛改变)的程度。我们量化了在2019-2020年野火中烧毁的更大滑翔机栖息地的范围。在该物种被列为易危物种后,新南威尔士州和昆士兰州对栖息地的破坏有所增加(新南威尔士州:7602公顷/年,c.f 7945公顷/年;面积:1501公顷/年(现价:5919公顷/年)。在维多利亚州,登记前和登记后的栖息地数量保持相对一致(登记前登记4916.5公顷,登记后登记4758.5公顷)。在澳大利亚范围内,我们估计29%的大型滑翔机栖息地在2019-2020年的野火中被烧毁。在37%被烧毁的大型滑翔机栖息地中,火灾严重或极端,这表明很少有滑翔机会在这些地区持续存在。我们证明,自列入EPBC以来,滑翔机栖息地的破坏和种群数量的下降一直是人类活动的直接结果(即森林砍伐和伐木)和间接结果(即人为引起的气候变化导致的严重野火)。我们建议紧急加强州和联邦的保护,以更好地保护受威胁的物种和环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pacific Conservation Biology
Pacific Conservation Biology Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Pacific Conservation Biology provides an important discussion forum for regional conservation issues, debate about management priorities, and dissemination of research results. The journal publishes original research, reviews, perspectives and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Ivor Beatty Award 2022 Special issues in Pacific Conservation Biology – an update <i>Corrigendum to</i>: The role of grass-tree <i>Xanthorrhoea semiplana</i> (Asphodelaceae) canopies in temperature regulation and waterproofing for ground-dwelling wildlife <i>Corrigendum to</i>: Community-driven shark monitoring for informed decision making: a case study from Fiji Retraction notice to ‘Key research priorities for the future of fish and fisheries in Australia’ [Pacific Conservation Biology (2022) doi:10.1071/PC21073]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1