Do people believe that you can have too much money? The relationship between hypothetical lottery wins and expected happiness

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Judgment and Decision Making Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1017/s1930297500009402
T. Haesevoets, Kim Dierckx, A. Van Hiel
{"title":"Do people believe that you can have too much money? The relationship\n between hypothetical lottery wins and expected happiness","authors":"T. Haesevoets, Kim Dierckx, A. Van Hiel","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500009402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Do people think that there is such a thing as too much money? The\n present research investigated this question in the context of hypothetical\n lottery wins. By employing a mental simulation approach, we were able to\n examine how people respond to increasing envisioned jackpot amounts, and\n whether there are individual differences in people’s reactions. Across five\n empirical studies (total N = 1,504), we consistently found that, overall,\n the relationship between imagined lottery wins and expected happiness is\n characterized by an inverted U-shaped curve, with expected happiness being\n highest around an envisioned win of roughly 10 million pounds. Both lower\n and higher envisioned wins reduced participants’ overall expected happiness.\n In addition to this overall pattern, we identified three clusters of\n participants who react differently to expected increases in wealth. These\n clusters mainly differed in terms of how soon the top of the expected\n happiness curve was reached, and if and when the curve started to drop.\n Finally, we also found some interesting cluster differences in terms of\n participants’ prosocial and proself motivations.","PeriodicalId":48045,"journal":{"name":"Judgment and Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judgment and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009402","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Do people think that there is such a thing as too much money? The present research investigated this question in the context of hypothetical lottery wins. By employing a mental simulation approach, we were able to examine how people respond to increasing envisioned jackpot amounts, and whether there are individual differences in people’s reactions. Across five empirical studies (total N = 1,504), we consistently found that, overall, the relationship between imagined lottery wins and expected happiness is characterized by an inverted U-shaped curve, with expected happiness being highest around an envisioned win of roughly 10 million pounds. Both lower and higher envisioned wins reduced participants’ overall expected happiness. In addition to this overall pattern, we identified three clusters of participants who react differently to expected increases in wealth. These clusters mainly differed in terms of how soon the top of the expected happiness curve was reached, and if and when the curve started to drop. Finally, we also found some interesting cluster differences in terms of participants’ prosocial and proself motivations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人们认为你可以有太多的钱吗?假设彩票中奖与预期幸福之间的关系
人们会认为有太多的钱吗?本研究在假设彩票中奖的背景下调查了这个问题。通过采用心理模拟方法,我们能够研究人们对预期中头奖金额增加的反应,以及人们的反应是否存在个体差异。在五项实证研究中(总N = 1504),我们一致发现,总体而言,想象中彩票中奖和预期幸福之间的关系呈现倒u型曲线,预期幸福在大约1000万英镑的预期中奖时达到最高。预期胜利的高低都会降低参与者的总体预期幸福度。除了这种总体模式之外,我们还确定了三组参与者,他们对预期财富增长的反应不同。这些群体的主要差异在于预期幸福曲线到达顶点的时间,以及曲线是否以及何时开始下降。最后,我们还发现在参与者的亲社会动机和亲自我动机方面存在一些有趣的集群差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Judgment and Decision Making
Judgment and Decision Making PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The benefits of deciding now and not later: The influence of the timing between acquiring knowledge and deciding on decision confidence, omission neglect bias, and choice deferral I want to believe: Prior beliefs influence judgments about the effectiveness of both alternative and scientific medicine The final step effect Choosing more aggressive commitment contracts for others than for the self Systematic metacognitive reflection helps people discover far-sighted decision strategies: A process-tracing experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1