The Problem of Reading Motivation Multidimensionality: Theoretical and Statistical Evaluation of a Reading Motivation Scale

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Reading Psychology Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI:10.1080/02702711.2023.2202175
Elvira Jéldrez, K. Cain, Macarena Silva, Katherine Strasser
{"title":"The Problem of Reading Motivation Multidimensionality: Theoretical and Statistical Evaluation of a Reading Motivation Scale","authors":"Elvira Jéldrez, K. Cain, Macarena Silva, Katherine Strasser","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2202175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Reading motivation is multidimensional and a critical contributor to students’ reading comprehension skill. Its multidimensionality is problematic, as there is currently no consensus on the dimensions underlying reading motivation, which are being tested through a variety of instruments that lack statistical validation. Our goal was to discuss the structure, reliability, and validity of a reading motivation scale in relation to prior theoretical proposals. The scale considered four affirming and four undermining reading motivations and was tested with 172 students from 2nd to 6th grade. Its structure was assessed using CFA and EFA. A four-factor structure had the best fit for the data: (1) Reading value and intrinsic motivation; (2) reading devalue and avoidance; (3) perceived self-efficacy; and (4) perceived difficulty. The results supported some prior theoretical distinctions, but question the appropriateness of widely used scales and suggest the need for more research on the multidimensionality of reading motivation.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2202175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Reading motivation is multidimensional and a critical contributor to students’ reading comprehension skill. Its multidimensionality is problematic, as there is currently no consensus on the dimensions underlying reading motivation, which are being tested through a variety of instruments that lack statistical validation. Our goal was to discuss the structure, reliability, and validity of a reading motivation scale in relation to prior theoretical proposals. The scale considered four affirming and four undermining reading motivations and was tested with 172 students from 2nd to 6th grade. Its structure was assessed using CFA and EFA. A four-factor structure had the best fit for the data: (1) Reading value and intrinsic motivation; (2) reading devalue and avoidance; (3) perceived self-efficacy; and (4) perceived difficulty. The results supported some prior theoretical distinctions, but question the appropriateness of widely used scales and suggest the need for more research on the multidimensionality of reading motivation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读动机的多维性问题——阅读动机量表的理论与统计评价
摘要阅读动机是多维的,是学生阅读理解能力的关键因素。它的多维性是有问题的,因为目前对阅读动机背后的维度还没有达成共识,而阅读动机正通过各种缺乏统计验证的工具进行测试。我们的目标是讨论阅读动机量表的结构、可靠性和有效性与先前的理论建议的关系。该量表考虑了四种肯定和四种破坏阅读动机,并对172名2至6年级的学生进行了测试。使用CFA和EFA对其结构进行了评估。四因素结构最适合数据:(1)阅读价值和内在动机;(2) 阅读贬值与回避;(3) 自我效能感;以及(4)感知困难。研究结果支持了先前的一些理论区别,但对广泛使用的量表的适当性提出了质疑,并表明有必要对阅读动机的多维性进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reading Psychology
Reading Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Prepared exclusively by professionals, this refereed journal publishes original manuscripts in the fields of literacy, reading, and related psychology disciplines. Articles appear in the form of completed research; practitioner-based "experiential" methods or philosophical statements; teacher and counselor preparation services for guiding all levels of reading skill development, attitudes, and interests; programs or materials; and literary or humorous contributions.
期刊最新文献
Unhinged: Reading Comprehension Tests as Gatekeepers to Teaching The Regularity of High-Frequency Words (Sight Words): Teacher Phonetic Knowledge is Key Investigating the Mechanisms Behind Relations Between Academic Language and Reading Comprehension: The Role of Reading Self-Concept and Reading Enjoyment An Exploration of the Impact of Quality Illustrations in Children’s Picture Books on Preschool Student Narrative Ability Metalinguistic Effects on English Spelling: A Structural Equation Model for Early Literacy Instruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1