Beyond Walking: An Assessment and Description of Streets as Potential Physical Activity Places in Low-Income Communities

M. Renée, U. Meyer, T. Prochnow, K. Ylitalo, L. Gómez, Joseph R. Sharkey
{"title":"Beyond Walking: An Assessment and Description of Streets as Potential Physical Activity Places in Low-Income Communities","authors":"M. Renée, U. Meyer, T. Prochnow, K. Ylitalo, L. Gómez, Joseph R. Sharkey","doi":"10.51250/jheal.v2i3.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-income communities often have fewer quality community-level physical activity places (PAPs) or resources (e.g., parks, playgrounds). When present, barriers like traffic, distance, and crime often prevent access. Creative solutions and better understanding of current and potential realistic PAPs are necessary for children and families to be active. Streets are rarely considered potential PAPs despite their ubiquity and accessibility. This article describes street segments as potential PAPs in two low-income Mexican-heritage colonias communities along the Texas-Mexico border. Promotora-researchers conducted PAP assessments of all street segments (n=867) in the two communities to describe the availability and quality of their physical activity features (e.g., basketball hoops, bicycles), amenities (e.g., paved driveways, yard space), and incivilities (e.g., vandalism, loose dogs). Streets in these communities did contain features and amenities associated with physical activity promotion. On average, street segments had 6.10 (SD=7.20) physical activity-promoting features, 27.65 (SD=27.30) physical activity-promoting amenities, and both were assessed as good-to-fair quality. Future physical activity programming should consider incorporating streets as potential PAPs to enhance physical activity and active play. Further, evaluating streets as PAPs in this way may provide insight into locations for temporary place-based programs such as Play Streets. Future research should also examine residents’ perceptions of their streets as PAPs for safe physical activity and active play, not just as places to walk, and which PAP characteristics matter for safe physical activity and active play to occur on streets.","PeriodicalId":73774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","volume":"2 1","pages":"126 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51250/jheal.v2i3.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Low-income communities often have fewer quality community-level physical activity places (PAPs) or resources (e.g., parks, playgrounds). When present, barriers like traffic, distance, and crime often prevent access. Creative solutions and better understanding of current and potential realistic PAPs are necessary for children and families to be active. Streets are rarely considered potential PAPs despite their ubiquity and accessibility. This article describes street segments as potential PAPs in two low-income Mexican-heritage colonias communities along the Texas-Mexico border. Promotora-researchers conducted PAP assessments of all street segments (n=867) in the two communities to describe the availability and quality of their physical activity features (e.g., basketball hoops, bicycles), amenities (e.g., paved driveways, yard space), and incivilities (e.g., vandalism, loose dogs). Streets in these communities did contain features and amenities associated with physical activity promotion. On average, street segments had 6.10 (SD=7.20) physical activity-promoting features, 27.65 (SD=27.30) physical activity-promoting amenities, and both were assessed as good-to-fair quality. Future physical activity programming should consider incorporating streets as potential PAPs to enhance physical activity and active play. Further, evaluating streets as PAPs in this way may provide insight into locations for temporary place-based programs such as Play Streets. Future research should also examine residents’ perceptions of their streets as PAPs for safe physical activity and active play, not just as places to walk, and which PAP characteristics matter for safe physical activity and active play to occur on streets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越步行:对街道作为低收入社区潜在体育活动场所的评估和描述
低收入社区通常拥有较少的社区级体育活动场所(PAP)或资源(如公园、游乐场)。当存在交通、距离和犯罪等障碍时,通常会阻止进入。创造性的解决方案和更好地了解当前和潜在的现实PAP对于儿童和家庭的积极性是必要的。街道很少被认为是潜在的PAP,尽管它们无处不在,无障碍。这篇文章描述了得克萨斯-墨西哥边境两个低收入墨西哥裔殖民地社区的街道片段作为潜在的PAP。Promotora的研究人员对这两个社区的所有街道路段(n=867)进行了PAP评估,以描述他们的体育活动特征(如篮球圈、自行车)、便利设施(如铺好的车道、庭院空间)和不文明行为(如故意破坏、流浪狗)的可用性和质量。这些社区的街道确实包含了与体育活动推广相关的特色和便利设施。平均而言,街道路段有6.10个(SD=7.20)促进体育活动的功能,27.65个(SD=27.30)促进体育运动的设施,两者都被评估为质量良好至尚可。未来的体育活动规划应考虑将街道作为潜在的PAP,以加强体育活动和积极玩耍。此外,以这种方式将街道评估为PAP可以提供对临时基于地点的项目(例如Play streets)的位置的深入了解。未来的研究还应检查居民对街道的看法,即他们的街道是安全体育活动和积极玩耍的PAP,而不仅仅是步行的地方,以及哪些PAP特征对街道上的安全体育活动或积极玩耍很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adult Sports Participation and Physical Activity: How About Curling? Black Girls as Transformative Leaders in Physical Activity Programs. Brownfields to Healthfields: A Retrospective Ripple Effect Mapping Evaluation in Three Rural Communities. Complete Highway Removal vs. Highway Removal to Boulevards vs. Caps: Redressing Past Wrongs while Addressing the Decay of America's Most Ambitious Public Works Project. Developing translational products for adapting evidence-based physical activity interventions in rural communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1